MASSACHUSETTS TRUSTEES, ETC. v. United States
Decision Date | 02 May 1962 |
Docket Number | No. 55-26.,55-26. |
Citation | 210 F. Supp. 822 |
Parties | MASSACHUSETTS TRUSTEES OF EASTERN GAS AND FUEL ASSOCIATES, Libelants, v. UNITED STATES of America, Respondent. |
Court | U.S. District Court — District of Massachusetts |
James S. Eastham, Boston, Mass., Kominers & Fort, Washington, D. C., for libelant; William M. Brady, Boston, Mass., J. Franklin Fort, Israel Convisser, Washington, D. C., of counsel.
W. Arthur Garrity, Jr., U. S. Atty., Boston, Mass., for respondent; Levenworth Colby, Lawrence F. Ledebur, Attys., Admiralty & Shipping Section, Dept. of Justice, of counsel.
1. On January 15, 1962 this Court issued an opinion, 202 F.Supp. 297, that the final judgment when entered herein should include the dismissal of libelant's first and second causes of action and the dismissal of respondent's first cause of action. This opinion is now amended in the following respects:
(a) In Section E, finding 14, pages 16 and 17 at page 308 the second sentence of the finding is amended to read, "The Government had vessels which it alleges had a fair charter hire of over 2 million dollars."
(b) Section F, Adjudications, paragraph 2, page 17 at page 308 is deleted. At the time the opinion was written Eastern had not had adequate opportunity to present evidence with respect to its second cause of action.
2. March 23, 1962 the parties by stipulation settled libelant's third cause of action and respondent's third and fourth causes of action. March 26, 1962 the Court entered a decree based on that stipulation.
3. There now remains for consideration only libelant's second cause of action. This cause of action, already summarized in the main opinion, has two aspects. The broader contention is that with respect to the year 1947 the Commission should have charged for all vessels chartered by Eastern during that year a rate calculated upon the accumulative net voyages profits for the year of all such vessels. The narrower contention is that the Commission had no right to require two separate accountings of the voyage profits of, respectively, the S. S. ISAAC SHARPLESS and the S. S. WASHINGTON IRVING. Each claim turns on the question whether the Government had an unfettered right to terminate the bareboat charters.
4. As the opinion of January 15, 1962 notes, on October 1, 1946 Eastern and the Commission entered into bareboat charters, Contract No. MC c-41881, for the use of certain Government owned vessels. Many of the terms of that Contract are set out in the opinion and need not be repeated. But it is now appropriate to quote Part II, Clauses 14 and 27, of the Contract.
5. While Eastern was using the chartered vessels, the Commission on August 15, 1947 sent to Eastern and other charterers, a telegram stating:
6. The Commission on August 20, 1947 sent to Eastern and other charterers a telegram stating:
7. August 25, 1947, Eastern sent a telegram to the Commission stating:
"Retel yours of August 15 and August 20 we accept addendum specified your wire of August 20 and have all vessels now chartered to us pursuant to Ship Sales Demise Charter Form 303 committed load coal during September with one exception which vessel loads early October."
8. In October, 1947, the Commission and Eastern executed Addendum No. 7 to the charter which embodied the terms of the foregoing telegrams. The relevant terms of that Addendum follow:
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Massachusetts Trustees of Eastern Gas and Fuel Associates v. United States
...All of these contentions were rejected by the owner court, the Court of Appeals affirming the District Court, 202 F.Supp. 297; 210 F.Supp. 822, in a thorough opinion, 312 F.2d Preliminarily we observe that in the view we take of that case we find it unnecessary to consider the Government's ......
-
SC Johnson & Son, Inc. v. Drop Dead Co.
... ... Civ. A. No. 1113-59 ... United States District Court S. D. California, Central Division ... ...