Mathews Hardware Co. v. Allied Sales Corporation
Decision Date | 26 June 1923 |
Docket Number | 6 Div. 89. |
Citation | 19 Ala.App. 303,97 So. 166 |
Parties | MATHEWS HARDWARE CO. v. ALLIED SALES CORPORATION. |
Court | Alabama Court of Appeals |
Appeal from Circuit Court, Tuscaloosa County; Henry B. Foster, Judge.
Action in assumpsit by the Mathews Hardware Company against the Allied Sales Corporation. From a judgment for defendant, plaintiff appeals. Affirmed.
Monette & Taylor, of Birmingham, for appellant.
Livingston & Smith, of Tuscaloosa, for appellee.
This cause was tried before the judge sitting without a jury. After hearing the evidence, judgment was entered for defendant. The bill of exceptions fails to state that it contains all of the evidence, and, in fact, it affirmatively appears that copy of two orders given Hooks Lumber Company on January 5 and 6, 1921, for shipment to Missouri Valley Bridge & Iron Company attached to answers of defendant to the seventh interrogatory and introduced in evidence by plaintiff, are not in the record. this being the case we cannot review the conclusions of fact arrived at by the trial judge. Gulf State Steel Co. v. Comstock, 17 Ala. App. 430, 85 So. 305; Prude v. Thompson & Thompson, 201 Ala. 595, 79 So. 21. This is the only question necessary to a decision.
The judgment is affirmed.
Affirmed.
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Starkey v. Bryant
...the refusal of the general charge is not open to review. Arrick v. Fanning, 35 Ala.App. 409, 47 So.2d 708; Mathews Hardware Co. v. Allied Sales Corp., 19 Ala.App. 303, 97 So. 166; Godfrey v. Vinson, 215 Ala. 166, 110 So. 13; Henley v. Lollar, 35 Ala.App. 182, 44 So.2d 791; Chandler v. Owens......
-
State v. Page
... ... ordinary business corporation, but is a civil or political ... division of the state, ... ...
- Livingston v. State