Mathews v. Cassidy Turley Md., Inc.

Docket Number51/12
Decision Date26 November 2013

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
94 cases
  • Simmons v. Maryland Management Company
    • United States
    • Maryland Court of Appeals
    • February 4, 2022
    ...v. Risser , 290 Md. 631, 636, 431 A.2d 677 (1981), and can be tolled by fraud under CJP § 5-203. Mathews v. Cassidy Turley Md., Inc., 435 Md. 584, 612, 80 A.3d 269 (2013). There are other statutory time limits for filing suit that are not statutes of limitation but are statutes of repose. U......
  • Ward v. State
    • United States
    • Maryland Court of Appeals
    • January 29, 2015
    ...upon the admissibility of evidence, we review de novo any “pure legal question” regarding evidence. See Mathews v. Cassidy Turley Md., Inc., 435 Md. 584, 599, 80 A.3d 269 (2013) (citing Hall v. Univ. of Md. Med. Sys. Corp., 398 Md. 67, 82, 919 A.2d 1177 (2007) ). In Douglas v. State, 423 Md......
  • May v. Air & Liquid Sys. Corp.
    • United States
    • Maryland Court of Appeals
    • December 18, 2015
    ...consider any reasonable inferences that may be drawn from the undisputed facts against the moving party." Mathews v. Cassidy Turley Md., Inc., 435 Md. 584, 598, 80 A.3d 269, 276 (2013). Because a circuit court's grant of summary judgment hinges on a question of law, not a dispute of fact, a......
  • Levitas v. Christian
    • United States
    • Maryland Court of Appeals
    • July 11, 2017
    ...Judge McDonald, writing for the Court, explained the applicable standards of review for these rulings in Mathews v. Cassidy Turley Maryland, Inc., 435 Md. 584, 80 A.3d 269 (2013) :Some matters, such as the weighing of the relevance of proffered evidence as against unfair prejudice or other ......
  • Get Started for Free
12 books & journal articles
  • Governmental documents
    • United States
    • James Publishing Practical Law Books Is It Admissible? Part II. Documentary evidence
    • May 1, 2022
    ...order an investigation and report concerning custodial arrangements for the child.” See also Mathews v. Cassidy Turley Maryland, Inc. , 435 Md. 584, 80 A.3d 269 (2013). 150 Villanueva v. Zimmer, 431 N.J.Super. 301, 69 A.3d 131 (N.J.Super., 2013); Wallis v. Townsend Vision, Inc. , 648 F.Supp......
  • Governmental Documents
    • United States
    • James Publishing Practical Law Books Archive Is It Admissible? - 2014 Part II - Documentary Evidence
    • July 31, 2014
    ...order an investigation and report concerning custodial arrangements for the child.” See also Mathews v. Cassidy Turley Maryland, Inc. , 435 Md. 584, 80 A.3d 269 (2013). 131. Villanueva v. Zimmer, 431 N.J.Super. 301, 69 A.3d 131 (N.J.Super., 2013); Wallis v. Townsend Vision, Inc. , 648 F.Sup......
  • Table of Cases
    • United States
    • James Publishing Practical Law Books Archive Is It Admissible? - 2014 Part IV - Demonstrative Evidence
    • July 31, 2014
    ...1.400, 10.300, 10.500 Mathes v. Sher Express, L.L.C ., 200 S.W.3d 97 (Mo.App. 2006), §44.300 Mathews v. Cassidy Turley Maryland, Inc. , 435 Md. 584, 80 A.3d 269 (2013), §21.435 Mathews v. State, 574 So.2d 1174 (Fla.App.5 Dist. 1991), §§5.405.1, 6.800 Matter of Estate of Saxton , 673 N.Y.S.2......
  • Governmental documents
    • United States
    • James Publishing Practical Law Books Archive Is It Admissible? - 2018 Documentary evidence
    • August 2, 2018
    ...order an investigation and report concerning custodial arrangements for the child.” See also Mathews v. Cassidy Turley Maryland, Inc. , 435 Md. 584, 80 A.3d 269 (2013). 144 Villanueva v. Zimmer, 431 N.J.Super. 301, 69 A.3d 131 (N.J.Super., 2013); Wallis v. Townsend Vision, Inc. , 648 F.Supp......
  • Get Started for Free