Matos v. Shelter Rock Homes, Inc.

Decision Date22 July 2015
Docket Number2013-08997
Citation14 N.Y.S.3d 120,2015 N.Y. Slip Op. 06223,130 A.D.3d 883
PartiesFeliciano MATOS, appellant, v. SHELTER ROCK HOMES, INC., et al., defendants, Luciano's Construction, Inc., respondent.
CourtNew York Supreme Court — Appellate Division

Hill & Moin, LLP, New York, N.Y. (Cheryl Eisberg Moin, Melisande Hill, and Lorraine Meyers of counsel), for appellant.

Weiner, Millo, Morgan & Bonanno, LLC, New York, N.Y. (Scott Morgan of counsel), for respondent.

PETER B. SKELOS, J.P., L. PRISCILLA HALL, SHERI S. ROMAN, and COLLEEN D. DUFFY, JJ.

Opinion

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiff appeals, as limited by his brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Ruchelsman, J.), dated July 25, 2013, as granted that branch of the motion of the defendant Luciano's Construction, Inc., which was for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against it.

ORDERED that the order is reversed insofar as appealed from, on the law, with costs, and that branch of the motion of the defendant Luciano's Construction, Inc., which was for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against it is denied.

The plaintiff allegedly was injured when he was struck by a fence door as he walked adjacent to a construction site. The construction site was owned by the defendant Shelter Rock Homes, Inc. (hereinafter Shelter Rock). Shelter Rock hired the defendant Luciano's Construction, Inc. (hereinafter Luciano), to perform, inter alia, the masonry work on the premises. Luciano moved, inter alia, for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against it on the ground that it owed no duty of care to the plaintiff. The Supreme Court granted the motion.

Generally, a contractual obligation, standing alone, will not give rise to tort liability in favor of a third party (see Mathey v. Metropolitan Transp. Auth., 95 A.D.3d 842, 943 N.Y.S.2d 578 ). However, liability may be assigned where a contracting party, in “failing to exercise reasonable care in the performance of his duties, launche[s] a force or instrument of harm,” where a plaintiff “detrimentally relies on the continued performance of the contracting party's duties,” or where “the contracting party has entirely displaced the other party's duty to maintain the premises safely” (Espinal v. Melville Snow Constrs., 98 N.Y.2d 136, 140, 746 N.Y.S.2d 120, 773 N.E.2d 485 [internal quotation marks omitted] ). Here, Luciano...

To continue reading

Request your trial
3 cases
  • Campbell v. Door Automation Corp.
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court
    • February 21, 2019
    ... ... Automation Corp., Besam Automated Entrance Systems, Inc., NABCO Entrances, Inc. and ASSA ABLOY Entrance Systems ... 173 [2d Dept. 2016]); Matos v. Shelter Rock Homes, ... Inc., 130 A.D.3d 883, 14 ... ...
  • Ostojic v. Gee
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • July 22, 2015
    ... ... N.Y.S.2d 667, 774 N.E.2d 732 ; Matter of Fairway Manor, Inc. v. Bertinelli, 81 A.D.3d 821, 822823, 916 N.Y.S.2d 630 ; ... ...
  • Marrero v. Sosinsky
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • July 22, 2015

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT