Matsyuk v. Konkalipos

Decision Date19 December 2006
Docket Number2006-00729.
Citation824 N.Y.S.2d 918,2006 NY Slip Op 09570,35 A.D.3d 675
PartiesGALINA MATSYUK, Respondent, v. KONSTANTIN KONKALIPOS et al., Respondents, and TATYANA TSIPENYUK, Appellant.
CourtNew York Supreme Court — Appellate Division

Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

The Supreme Court properly denied the appellant's motion for summary judgment because the papers she submitted in support of her motion failed to include copies of all of the pleadings in the action as required by CPLR 3212 (b) (see Wider v Heller, 24 AD3d 433 [2005]; Sted Tenants Owners Corp. v Chumpitaz, 5 AD3d 663 [2004]; Hamilton v City of New York, 262 AD2d 283 [1999]; Deer Park Assoc. v Robbins Store, 243 AD2d 443 [1997]; Lawlor v County of Nassau, 166 AD2d 692 [1990]).

Prudenti, P.J., Krausman, Mastro and Rivera, JJ., concur.

To continue reading

Request your trial
16 cases
  • Fuller & D'Angelo, P.C. v. Cornerstone Hospitality Advisors
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court
    • September 15, 2011
    ...of the motions is warranted for that reason alone. State of New York v, Metz, 241 A.D.2d 192, 198 (1st Dep't 1998); Matsyuk v. Konkalipos, 35 A.D.3d 675, 676 (2d Dep't 2006); Kyung Mi Lee v. Musso, 30 A.D.3d 1089 (4th Dep't 2006); Sted Tenants Owners Corp. v. Chumpitaz, 5 A.D.3d 663 (2d Dep......
  • Regno v. City of N.Y.
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court
    • August 31, 2015
    ...v. 260 Wash. St., LLC, 105 A.D.3d 675 (1st Dep't 2013); Weinstein v. Gindi, 92 A.D.3d 526, 527 (1st Dep't 2012); Matsyuk v. Konkalipos, 35 A.D.3d 675, 676 (2d Dep't 2006); Welton v. Drobnicki, 298 A.D.2d 757 (3d Dep't 2002), or "a complete set of the pleadings." Washington Realty Owners, LL......
  • Whalen v. Villegas
    • United States
    • New York District Court
    • April 1, 2013
    ...719, 955 N.Y.S.2d 86 (2nd Dept.2012); Zellner v. Tarnell, 54 A.D.3d 329, 861 N.Y.S.2d 598 (2nd Dept.2007); and Matsyuk v. Konkapilos, 35 A.D.3d 675, 824 N.Y.S.2d 918 (2nd Dept.2006); and CPLR 3212(b). Plaintiffs motion papers do not contain a copy of the defendants answer. The defendants an......
  • Booth v. Ecozone, Inc.
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court
    • May 24, 2019
    ...v. Gindi, 92 A.D.3d 526, 527 (1st Dep't 2012); State of New York v. Metz, 241 A.D.2d 192, 198 (1st Dep't 1998); Matsyuk v. Konkalipos, 35 A.D.3d 675, 676 (2d Dep't 2006). Here, however, the record is sufficiently complete to determine Rapid Construction and Renovation's motion insofar as it......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT