Matsyuk v. Konkalipos
Decision Date | 19 December 2006 |
Docket Number | 2006-00729. |
Citation | 824 N.Y.S.2d 918,2006 NY Slip Op 09570,35 A.D.3d 675 |
Parties | GALINA MATSYUK, Respondent, v. KONSTANTIN KONKALIPOS et al., Respondents, and TATYANA TSIPENYUK, Appellant. |
Court | New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division |
Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.
The Supreme Court properly denied the appellant's motion for summary judgment because the papers she submitted in support of her motion failed to include copies of all of the pleadings in the action as required by CPLR 3212 (b) (see Wider v Heller, 24 AD3d 433 [2005]; Sted Tenants Owners Corp. v Chumpitaz, 5 AD3d 663 [2004]; Hamilton v City of New York, 262 AD2d 283 [1999]; Deer Park Assoc. v Robbins Store, 243 AD2d 443 [1997]; Lawlor v County of Nassau, 166 AD2d 692 [1990]).
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Fuller & D'Angelo, P.C. v. Cornerstone Hospitality Advisors
...of the motions is warranted for that reason alone. State of New York v, Metz, 241 A.D.2d 192, 198 (1st Dep't 1998); Matsyuk v. Konkalipos, 35 A.D.3d 675, 676 (2d Dep't 2006); Kyung Mi Lee v. Musso, 30 A.D.3d 1089 (4th Dep't 2006); Sted Tenants Owners Corp. v. Chumpitaz, 5 A.D.3d 663 (2d Dep......
-
Regno v. City of N.Y.
...v. 260 Wash. St., LLC, 105 A.D.3d 675 (1st Dep't 2013); Weinstein v. Gindi, 92 A.D.3d 526, 527 (1st Dep't 2012); Matsyuk v. Konkalipos, 35 A.D.3d 675, 676 (2d Dep't 2006); Welton v. Drobnicki, 298 A.D.2d 757 (3d Dep't 2002), or "a complete set of the pleadings." Washington Realty Owners, LL......
-
Whalen v. Villegas
...719, 955 N.Y.S.2d 86 (2nd Dept.2012); Zellner v. Tarnell, 54 A.D.3d 329, 861 N.Y.S.2d 598 (2nd Dept.2007); and Matsyuk v. Konkapilos, 35 A.D.3d 675, 824 N.Y.S.2d 918 (2nd Dept.2006); and CPLR 3212(b). Plaintiffs motion papers do not contain a copy of the defendants answer. The defendants an......
-
Booth v. Ecozone, Inc.
...v. Gindi, 92 A.D.3d 526, 527 (1st Dep't 2012); State of New York v. Metz, 241 A.D.2d 192, 198 (1st Dep't 1998); Matsyuk v. Konkalipos, 35 A.D.3d 675, 676 (2d Dep't 2006). Here, however, the record is sufficiently complete to determine Rapid Construction and Renovation's motion insofar as it......