Matter of Application of Sherwood
Decision Date | 10 January 1980 |
Docket Number | Appeal No. 79-579. |
Citation | 613 F.2d 809 |
Parties | In the Matter of the Application of John W. C. SHERWOOD. |
Court | U.S. Court of Customs and Patent Appeals (CCPA) |
Harold D. Messner, San Francisco, Cal., attorney of record for appellant; William J. Egan, III, San Francisco, Cal., of counsel.
Joseph F. Nakamura, Washington, D.C., for the Commissioner of Patents and Trademarks; Jere W. Sears, Washington, D.C., of counsel.
Before MARKEY, Chief Judge, RICH, BALDWIN and MILLER, Judges, and NEWMAN, Judge.*
This is an appeal from the decision of the United States Patent and Trademark Office (PTO) Board of Appeals (board) affirming the rejections of all the claims as unpatentable under 35 U.S.C. § 101 for being directed to nonstatutory subject matter and under 35 U.S.C. § 112, paragraph one, for being based on a specification which fails to disclose the best mode. This application, serial No. 567,458,1 was filed April 14, 1975, and is entitled "Continuous Automatic Migration of Seismic Reflection Data with Waveform Preservation." We reverse.
A very common method of geophysical prospecting involves the production of a sonic (or seismic) wave in the earth. Certain subsurface geological formations, which may contain petroleum deposits, will reflect this induced seismic wave upward where it will be detected by variously spaced surface geophones. Each resulting geophone signal, as recorded, is merely an amplitude-time representation of that reflected sonic wave and is known as a "seismic trace." This invention involves apparatus (or "means for") and a method for producing a cross-sectional map (or "seismic depth section") depicting the position and shape of those subsurface formations.
Claim 15 is typical of the "means"-type claims which recite apparatus for plotting the desired map:
Claim 21 is illustrative of the "means"-type claims which do not recite a final plotting "means."
The specification is largely directed to a discussion of analog computer apparatus suitable for producing the desired subsurface map by solving the disclosed equations. The specification also states:
The final seismic depth section reproduced in FIGURE 8 was actually prepared by performing the method of the present invention on a large scale digital computer. It should be understood that the analog apparatus here shown as mechanical devices electrically interconnected are intended to assist in the understanding of the invention. The best mode contemplated by the inventor of carrying out the invention is to perform the processing steps of the invention on a large scale digital computer with the processed data imprinted into visible form on any of the presently available plotting devices.
The examiner stated in the Answer that the rejection was two-fold.
First, the examiner noted:
Secondly:
The examiner responded to appellant's brief in stating:
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Discovision Associates v. Disc Mfg., Inc.
...860 F.2d 415, 418 (Fed.Cir.1988); Spectra-Physics, Inc. v. Coherent, Inc., 827 F.2d 1524, 1535 (Fed.Cir. 1987); In re Sherwood, 613 F.2d 809, 816 (Cust. & Pat.App.1980). Cf. Brooktree Corp. v. Advanced Micro Devices, Inc., 977 F.2d 1555, 1575 (Fed.Cir.1992) ("Invalidity for violation of the......
-
Zumbro, Inc. v. Merck and Co., Inc., No. 90 C 2507.
...would seem to be no cogent reason to require disclosure of the menial tools known to all who practice this art." See In re Sherwood, 613 F.2d 809, 817 n. 6 (C.C.P.A.1980) ("The conversion of a complete thought (as expressed in English and mathematics, i.e., the known input, the desired outp......
-
Railroad Dynamics, Inc. v. A. Stucki Co.
...Inc. v. Dynex Industrial Plastics Corp., 363 F.Supp. 582, 602 (D.N.J. 1973), aff'd, 492 F.2d 1238 (3d Cir.1974); In re Sherwood, 613 F.2d 809, 817, (C.C.P.A. 1980) cert. denied, 450 U.S. 994, 101 S.Ct. 1694, 68 L.Ed.2d 193 (1981) ("there would seem to be no cogent reason to require disclosu......
-
Arrhythmia Research Technology, Inc. v. Corazonix Corp.
...... converts one physical thing into another physical thing just as any other electrical circuitry would do". In re Sherwood, 613 F.2d 809, 819, 204 USPQ 537, 546 (CCPA 1980), cert. denied, 450 U.S. 994, 101 S.Ct. 1694, 68 L.Ed.2d 193 (1981) (holding statutory claims to an apparatus for ana......
-
THE DEATH OF THE GENUS CLAIM.
...courts considered the act of translating thoughts into code "a mere clerical function to a skilled programmer." In re Sherwood, 613 F.2d 809, 817 & n.6 (C.C.P.A. 1980) (finding disclosure of "menial" tools used in programming unnecessary). More recently, however, this view shifted in fa......
-
The layers of obviousness in patent law.
...10/innovationrpt.pdf. (138.) N. Telecom, Inc. v. Datapoint Corp., 908 F.2d 931, 942 (Fed. Cir. 1990) (quoting In re Sherwood, 613 F.2d 809, 817 n.6 (C.C.P.A. (139.) See, e.g., Wikipedia, List of Software Bugs, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ List_of_software_bugs (as of Dec. 19, 2008 00:00 GM......
-
Chapter §5.06 Two-Step Analysis
...is not satisfied, it must be shown that the applicant knew of and concealed a better mode than he disclosed."); In re Sherwood, 613 F.2d 809, 816 (C.C.P.A. 1980) ("[E]vidence of concealment (accidental or intentional) is to be considered."); In re Nelson, 280 F.2d 172, 184 (C.C.P.A. 1960), ......
-
Risks Associated With Restricting Business Method and E-commerce Patents
...whether the subject matter of a claim falls within the Sec. 101 categories of possibly patentable subject matter."); In re Sherwood, 613 F.2d 809, 818 (Fed. Cir. 1980) ("[T]he novelty . . . of any element or even of all the elements or steps, or of the combination has no bearing on whether ......