MATTER OF CONTINENTAL INSURANCE COMPANY v. City of Rye

• Court: New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
• Citation: MATTER OF CONTINENTAL INSURANCE COMPANY v. City of Rye, 257 A.D.2d 573, 683 N.Y.S.2d 585 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)
• Decision Date: 11 January 1999
• Parties: In the Matter of CONTINENTAL INSURANCE COMPANY, as Subrogee of PAUL D. COLLINS, Respondent,<BR>v.<BR>CITY OF RYE et al., Appellants.

257 A.D.2d 573

683 N.Y.S.2d 585

In the Matter of CONTINENTAL INSURANCE COMPANY, as Subrogee of PAUL D. COLLINS, Respondent,

v.CITY OF RYE et al., Appellants.

Decided January 11, 1999.

O'Brien, J. P., Sullivan, Krausman and Florio, JJ., concur.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

On October 19, 1996, the petitioner's insured, Paul D. Collins, was in an automobile accident involving three motor vehicles, including a City of Rye fire chiefs vehicle. The petitioner, as subrogee, sought to recover for property damage sustained by the insured as a result of the collision. The Supreme Court granted the petitioner's application for leave to serve a late notice of claim pursuant to General Municipal Law § 50-e (5), and this appeal followed.

The appellants' contention that the City of Rye had not received actual notice of the accident within the 90-day statutory period is without merit. Although a police report regarding an automobile accident does not itself constitute notice of the accident to a municipality (see, Matter of Dube v City of New York, 158 AD2d 457), in this case, the insured's vehicle was hit by the City of Rye fire chiefs vehicle during the course of duty. In addition to a City of Rye police accident report, there was a City of Rye Fire Department incident report and an investigation conducted into the accident by the Board of Fire Wardens of the Rye Fire Department as of December 31, 1996 (see, Matter of DeAngelis v...