Matter of Extradition of Artukovic
Decision Date | 06 February 1986 |
Docket Number | No. CV 84-8743-R(B),CV 85-3611-R.,CV 84-8743-R(B) |
Citation | 628 F. Supp. 1370 |
Parties | In the Matter of the EXTRADITION OF Andrija ARTUKOVIC. Andrija ARTUKOVIC, Petitioner, v. Richard RISON, Warden, Respondent. |
Court | U.S. District Court — Central District of California |
COPYRIGHT MATERIAL OMITTED
Robert C. Bonner, U.S. Atty., Robert L. Brosio, Asst. U.S. Atty., Chief, Criminal Div. by David Nimmer, Asst. U.S. Atty., Los Angeles, Cal., and, Murray R. Stein, Associate Director, Office of Intern. Affairs, U.S. Dept. of Justice, and Ronnie L. Edelman, Trial Atty., Office of Special Investigations, U.S. Dept. of Justice, Washington, D.C., for U.S.
Gary B. Fleischman and Michael P. Dacquisto, Beverly Hills, Cal., and Ronald H. Bonaparte of Los Angeles, Cal., for respondent.
ORDER ADOPTING OPINION OF MAGISTRATE
This matter is before the court upon a Writ of Habeas Corpus in the nature of a review of the decision of Magistrate Volney V. Brown, Jr., ordering extradition of petitioner to Yugoslavia to answer charges of murder.
The court has reviewed the entire record in this matter, has considered all of the evidence and arguments submitted by the parties in the extradition hearing and with this Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus.
IT IS ORDERED the court adopts the opinion heretofore filed by Magistrate Brown on all issues presented to him during the extradition hearing. The opinion of Magistrate Brown correctly states the law and is supported by evidence presented during the many hearings held by the magistrate. The opinion adopted is specifically that Amended Opinion filed August 9, 1985 and now instructs the Clerk to enter orders made therein as the Order of this court.
The Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus adds nothing to the review function of this court on the extradition question.
The petition is denied.
AMENDED OPINIONAugust 8, 1985
VOLNEY V. BROWN, Jr., United States Magistrate.
The Honorable Borislav Krajina, Federal Secretary for Justice of the Federal Socialist Republic of Yugoslavia "Yugoslavia", by request dated July 19, 1984, sought the extradition of Andrija Artukovic "respondent" for prosecution in the District Court of Zagreb, pursuant to an indictment of February 29, 1984. The indictment charged "criminal offence against humanity and international law—war crime committed against the civilian population" "war crimes" proscribed by Yugoslavian Article 142, recently enacted. The 1984 indictment amended and incorporated an indictment of September 4, 1951, charging murder in violation of Article 135(2) then in force, of which indictment this Court takes judicial notice from its own records in Karadzole v. Artukovic, 170 F.Supp. 383 (S.D. Calif.1959).1
Pursuant to a complaint for extradition filed on November 14, 1984, respondent was arrested and held without bail. The complaint alleges that he "is duly and legally charged with murder, in violation of the laws of and in the jurisdiction of the Government of Yugoslavia;" that murder "is among the offenses enumerated in Article II of the Treaty of Extradition between the United States and Servia (now Yugoslavia) of May 17, 1902, 32 Stat. 1890 "Treaty", which is still in full force and effect;2 that the offense charged "is a proper ground for this Court to order extradition pursuant to Title 18, United States Code, Section 3184;" and, that respondent should therefore "be surrendered to competent authorities of Yugoslavia."
This Magistrate has jurisdiction conferred directly by the Treaty, by 18 U.S.C. § 3184, and by the Local Rules of the United States District Court for the Central District of California.
The following questions must be answered:
The facts necessary for a determination of this matter are as follows:
During World War II, the Germans and Italians invaded Yugoslavia. On April 10, 1941, at the behest of the Ustasha, a political organization which was or became armed, the Axis permitted the creation of the Independent State of Croatia. Respondent became Minister of Interior and held other high offices. There was conflict between Croatians, Serbians, Communists, Jews, Christians (Orthodox and Roman Catholic), Moslems and others, and these groups variously fought, persecuted each other and/or fled. Affidavits in evidence show that tens of thousands of atrocities were committed.
A "new" affidavit in evidence is that of Avdic Bajro, dated July 6, 1984 (Excerpts, Tab 11, pp. 74 et seq.) Born in 1924, this witness says that, following training, in November, 1941, he was "ordered into the motorized unit of the state escort service to escort leader Pavelic, Andrija Artukovic Minister of Interior Affairs and other ministers of the NDH ... Independent State of Croatia."
This is a first-person account of the killing of certainly entirely helpless prisoners, at the direct order of respondent and in his immediate presence.
Witness Bajro also states that he accompanied the respondent and others in the beginning of 1942 to where Ustashas were carrying out a military offensive against partisans. He says that in the village of Vrgin Most respondent, "after learning that in the houses women, children and men were locked, ordered the tanks towards these houses, to penetrate them and destroy them completely together with all men, women and children inside...."
Continuing his testimony, witness Bajro says:
These deaths on the return to Vrgin Most, and of civilians gathered from the vicinity of the monastery Moscenica, were not in the course of military action, but of persons "arrested" or "gathered" and, therefore, not a military threat.
The pertinent testimony of witness Bajro concludes with these words:
Respondent is now an older man, born on or about November 19,...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Quinn v. Robinson
... ... States and the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland ("United Kingdom"), Extradition Treaty of June 8, 1972, United States--United Kingdom, 28 U.S.T. 227, T.I.A.S. No. 8468 ... 689, 40 L.Ed. 787 (1896). The only time we considered the subject, see Karadzole v. Artukovic, 247 F.2d 198 (9th Cir.1957), the Supreme Court vacated our opinion, see Karadzole v. Artukovic, ... 733, 734 (1969) (in Western world, "extradition is a matter of favor or comity rather than a legal duty"), and no branch of the United States government has ... ...
-
In re Mujagic
... 990 F.Supp.2d 207 In the Matter of the EXTRADITION OF Sulejman MUJAGIC. Criminal Action No. 5:12–MJ–0529 (DEP). United States ... that the fugitive was extraditable for the murder of prisoners of war); Extradition of Artukovic, 628 F.Supp. 1370, 1376 (C.D.Calif.1986), overruled on other grounds by Lopez–Smith v. Hood, ... ...
-
United States v. Amabile
... ... Docket No. 4 ; 1 Docket No. 16-1 (Italy's extradition request). Italy makes this extradition request under the Extradition Treaty between the United ... Id. Mr. Tamburello stated that Mr. Valente had never talked to him directly about the matter, but that Mr. Amabile himself had brought it up with Mr. Tamburello: "No, I didn't talk to [Mr ... , such as through the testimony of appropriate witnesses."); Matter of Extradition of Artukovic , 628 F. Supp. 1370, 1376 (C.D. Cal. 1986) (stating that "[w]hile 1390 makes evidence certified as ... ...
-
In re Extradition of HandanoviC
... 829 F.Supp.2d 979 In the Matter of the EXTRADITION OF Rasema HANDANOVIC. No. 3:11mc9097ST. United States District Court, D. Oregon,Portland Division. Nov. 1, 2011 ... [829 ... Ivancevic v. Artukovic, 211 F.2d 565, 575 (9th Cir.1954). Applying the successor state doctrine, it concluded that the new nation of Yugoslavia was effected with Serbia as ... ...
-
Due Process, the Sixth Amendment, and International Extradition
...WL 2580641, at *2-3 (N.D. Cal. Aug. 29, 2009). 230. SeeYapp, 26 F.3d at 1568; Martin, 993 F.2d at 830; Inre Extradition of Ar-tukovic, 628 F. Supp. 1370, 1375-76 (C.D. Cal. 1986); see also Man-Seok Choe v. Torres, 525 F.3d 733, 741-42 (9th Cir. 2008) (finding that the four-year delay betwee......