Matthews v. Nelson

Decision Date18 January 1960
Citation157 A.2d 364,31 N.J. 296
PartiesLoretta MATTHEWS, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Edna NELSON et al., Defendants-Petitioners.
CourtNew Jersey Supreme Court

On petition for certification to Superior Court, Appellate Division.

See same case below: 57 N.J.Super. 515, 155 A.2d 111.

Gaffey & Webb, Newark, for the petitioners.

Robert A. Lederer, Toms River, for the respondent.

Denied.

To continue reading

Request your trial
6 cases
  • Tichenor v. Santillo
    • United States
    • New Jersey Superior Court — Appellate Division
    • May 22, 1987
    ...167, 169, 459 A.2d 691 (App.Div.1983); Matthews v. Nelson, 57 N.J.Super. 515, 518, 155 A.2d 111 (App.Div.1959), certif. den. 31 N.J. 296, 157 A.2d 364 (1960). It is ordinarily for the jury to determine the standard of care of a reasonable man in automobile negligence cases. Ettin v. Ava Tru......
  • Tenore v. Nu Car Carriers, Inc.
    • United States
    • New Jersey Supreme Court
    • June 18, 1975
    ...of his working life, had he lived. See Matthews v. Nelson, 57 N.J.Super. 515, 520, 155 A.2d 111 (App.Div.1959), certif. den., 31 N.J. 296, 157 A.2d 364 (1960); Kappel v. Public Service Ry., 105 N.J.L. 264, 265, 144 A. 182 (Sup.Ct.1929). See also Russell v. City of Wildwood, 428 F.2d 1176, 1......
  • Cross v. Robert E. Lamb, Inc.
    • United States
    • New Jersey Superior Court — Appellate Division
    • February 23, 1960
    ...S.E.2d 777, 785 (S.C.Sup.Ct.1959); cf. Matthews v. Nelson, 57 N.J.Super. 515, 155 A.2d 111 (App.Div.1959), certification denied 31 N.J. 296, 157 A.2d 364 (1960) (not a blackboard case), stressing the importance of an instruction on the non-evidential character of an argument on damages. In ......
  • Condella v. Cumberland Farms, Inc.
    • United States
    • New Jersey Superior Court
    • October 21, 1996
    ...evidence nor distort the factual picture." Matthews v. Nelson, 57 N.J.Super. 515, 521, 155 A.2d 111 (App.Div.), certif. denied, 31 N.J. 296, 157 A.2d 364 (1959). Case law discussing the replaying of videotape testimony for the jury is limited, but State v. Michaels, 264 N.J.Super. 579, 625 ......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT