Your World of Legal Intelligence
 United States | 1-929-605-4013

Matthews v. State

Document Justia Case Summary Cited authorities 14 Cited in 178 Precedent Map Related
Docket Number20/11
Decision Date26 January 2012
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
188 cases
  • State v. Williams
    • United States
    • Court of Special Appeals of Maryland
    • August 31, 2022
    ...is not permitted, and is therefore illegal, if it "exceed[s] the limits imposed by law, be it statute or rule." Matthews v. State , 424 Md. 503, 514, 36 A.3d 499 (2012). See also Walczak v. State , 302 Md. 422, 433, 488 A.2d 949 (1985) (holding that a trial court imposed an illegal sentence......
  • Pitts v. State
    • United States
    • Court of Special Appeals of Maryland
    • April 29, 2021
    ...Court examined the same distinction in Matthews v. State, 197 Md. App. 365, 375, 13 A.3d 834 (2011), rev'd on other grounds, 424 Md. 503, 36 A.3d 499 (2012):Emerging from a survey of a quarter of a century of Maryland caselaw is the overarching principle that the values of finality and clos......
  • Pitts v. State
    • United States
    • Court of Special Appeals of Maryland
    • April 29, 2021
    ...Court examined the same distinction in Matthews v. State, 197 Md. App. 365, 375, 13 A.3d 834 (2011), rev'd on other grounds, 424 Md. 503, 36 A.3d 499 (2012) :Emerging from a survey of a quarter of a century of Maryland caselaw is the overarching principle that the values of finality and clo......
  • Y.Y. v. State
    • United States
    • Court of Special Appeals of Maryland
    • June 27, 2012
    ...subject to terms it deems appropriate.” The State cites Cuffley v. State, 416 Md. 568, 582, 7 A.3d 557 (2010) and Matthews v. State, 424 Md. 503, 36 A.3d 499 (2012), for the proposition that Rule 4–243(d) requires strict compliance and that any questions arising from a “binding plea agreeme......
    • Request a trial to view additional results
2 books & journal articles
  • Chapter 27 CRIMINAL APPEALS IN MARYLAND—THE DEFENSE PERSPECTIVE
    • United States
    • Maryland State Bar Association Appellate Practice for the Maryland Lawyer: State and Federal (MSBA) (2023 Ed.)
    • Invalid date
    ...the evidence is actually offered to preserve his objection for appellate review.").[51] See Md. Rule 4-345(a).[52] See Matthews v. State, 424 Md. 503, 512, 36 A.3d 499, 505 (2012); see also Ray v. State, 230 Md. App. 157, 162-63, 146 A.3d 1157, 1160 (2016), aff'd, 454 Md. 563, 165 A.3d 408 ......
  • Sentencing Motions
    • United States
    • Maryland State Bar Association Warnken's Maryland Criminal Procedure (MSBA) Chapter 30 Sentencing
    • Invalid date
    ...must inhere in the sentence itself, rather than stem from trial court error during the sentencing proceeding." (quoting Matthews v. State, 424 Md. 503, 512 (2012)). Accordingly, "we have denied relief pursuant to Rule 4-345(a) because the sentences imposed were not inherently illegal, despi......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT