Matthews v. United States
Decision Date | 09 November 1944 |
Docket Number | No. 11093.,11093. |
Citation | 145 F.2d 823 |
Parties | MATTHEWS v. UNITED STATES. |
Court | U.S. Court of Appeals — Fifth Circuit |
O. S. Lewis, of Dothan, Ala., for appellant.
Hartwell Davis, Asst. U. S. Atty., of Montgomery, Ala., for appellee.
Before SIBLEY, McCORD, and LEE, Circuit Judges.
The defendant offered himself as a witness in his trial. He could lawfully be impeached as a witness by proof that he had been convicted of other felonies and could be himself interrogated about it. Williams v. United States, 5 Cir., 254 F. 52; Gordon v. United States, 5 Cir., 254 F. 53; Wheeler v. United States, 5 Cir., 293 F. 588; Pittman v. United States, 8 Cir., 42 F.2d 793; Fire Assn. of Philadelphia v. Weathered, 5 Cir., 62 F.2d 78; Scaffidi v. United States, 1 Cir., 37 F.2d 203.
Judgment affirmed.
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Daniel v. United States
...5 Cir., 249 F.2d 737; Steele v. United States, 5 Cir., 243 F.2d 712; Newman v. United States, 5 Cir., 220 F.2d 289; Matthews v. United States, 5 Cir., 145 F.2d 823. 7 Fed.R.Crim.P. 51; Butler v. United States, 5 Cir., 254 F.2d 875; Brennan v. United States, 8 Cir., 240 F.2d 253; Atkins v. U......
-
Bendelow v. United States, 25551.
...denied 350 U.S. 824, 76 S.Ct. 51, 100 L.Ed. 736 (1955), Kemp v. Government of Canal Zone, 5 Cir. 1948, 167 F.2d 938, Matthews v. United States, 5 Cir. 1944, 145 F.2d 823, 4 Jones on Evidence, § 927, at 1738 (1958). 8 United States v. Sanders, 5 Cir. 1969, 412 F.2d 854; Beaudine v. United St......
-
Hargett v. United States
...121, and 254 of Title 18 before the adoption of the new criminal code. 3 See Russell v. United States, 5 Cir., 146 F.2d 129; Matthews v. U. S., 5 Cir., 145 F.2d 823. ...
-
Morton v. State
...F.2d 938, 940 (two felonies); Russell v. United States, 5 Cir. 1945, 146 F.2d 129 ('previous convictions of crime'); Matthews v. United States, 5 Cir. 1945, 145 F.2d 823 ('other felonies').' (Emphasis Lockwood was a case decided by this 2nd District Court, and the opinion by Judge Allen fir......