Mattis v. Connolly

Citation63 N.W. 918,45 Neb. 628
PartiesMATTIS ET AL. v. CONNOLLY ET AL.
Decision Date22 June 1895
CourtSupreme Court of Nebraska

OPINION TEXT STARTS HERE

Syllabus by the Court.

In this case there are discussed only questions of fact, and, as the bill of exceptions was settled by the clerk of the district court without an agreement upon it, these questions cannot be considered.

Appeal from district court, Pawnee county; Bush, Judge.

Action by Ross Mattis, trustee, and another, against John Connolly and others to foreclose a mortgage. From the decree rendered, certain defendants appeal. Affirmed.H. C. Lindsay, Humphrey & Raper, and Story & Story, for appellants.

W. W. Giffen, G. E. Becker, and J. J. Baker, for appellees.

RYAN, C.

In this case the bill of exceptions was signed by the clerk, upon a stipulation that he should settle and allow it. There was, however, no agreement upon the bill of exceptions, and following Scott v. Spencer (Neb.) 60 N. W. 892, we cannot treat it as such. We find that the briefs of counsel, upon which, without oral argument, this cause was submitted, discuss only questions of fact. These we cannot advisedly consider, and the judgment of the district court is affirmed. Affirmed.

To continue reading

Request your trial
1 cases

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT