Mawhinney v. Doane

Decision Date09 February 1889
PartiesFRANK MAWHINNEY et al v. ABNER H. DOANE et al
CourtKansas Supreme Court

Motion for Rehearing.

THE facts sufficiently appear in Mawhinney v. Doane, supra, and in the opinion on the motion for a rehearing, filed at the session of the court in February, 1889.

Motion for rehearing overruled.

W. A S. Bird, for plaintiffs in error.

Waters & Chase, and E. F. Hilton, for defendants in error.

OPINION

PER CURIAM.

An opinion was filed in this case at the February sitting, 1888 subsequently a motion for a rehearing was presented therefore the questions involved have been again discussed and considered. The plaintiff in error Frank Mawhinney, sues in his own right and as statutory guardian of Nettie M Bragunier and Nina F. Bragunier. He declares on a judgment that was rendered against the defendants in error Doane and Rice, and one Jeremiah Bragunier, in the district court of Shawnee county, on the 30th day of January, 1879. An execution was issued on this judgment on the 3d day of September, 1879, returned with a credit thereon of $ 502. Another execution was issued on the 6th day of September, 1879, and another on the 11th day of December, 1879; both returned unsatisfied. On the 9th day of November, 1879, Jeremiah Bragunier, one of the judgment debtors, died. On the 26th day of November, 1879, David Shellabarger, the owner of the judgment, assigned it for a consideration to one Sarah F. Bragunier. Frank Mawhinney married Sarah F. Bragunier, the purchaser of the judgment, on the 10th day of March, 1881. On the 31st day of January, 1882, and on the 23d day of February, 1882, other executions were issued on the judgment, and returned unsatisfied. On the 13th day of April, 1882, Sarah F. Mawhinney, the owner of the judgment, died, leaving Frank Mawhinney, her husband, and Nettie M. and Nina F. Bragunier, her daughters, as her heirs-at-law. On the 17th day of April, 1882, Frank Mawhinney was duly appointed administrator of the estate of Sarah F. Mawhinney, and on the 20th day of April, 1885, the estate was fully settled, and Frank Mawhinney discharged from the administration. On the 17th day of April, Frank Mawhinney was duly appointed by the probate court of Shawnee county guardian of the persons and estates of Nettie M. and Nina F. Bragunier. In his petition he prays a judgment for the amount of the original judgment, with interest and costs, and alleges that the judgment is still in full force and unsatisfied. Among other defenses the answer alleged that by the death of Shellabarger, who owned the judgment originally, and the death of Mr. Bragunier, to whom it was assigned by Shellabarger, and by reason of the fact that it has never been revived in the name of the administrator of the estates of Shellabarger or Bragunier or Mawhinney within one year after the death of either or both of them, the judgment had become dormant, and no action could be maintained on it. A demurrer was interposed to this defense, and it was overruled, and the case brought here.

We held in the original opinion that the judgment had become dormant because of the death of Sarah F. Mawhinney, to whom Shellabarger, the judgment creditor, had assigned it. This...

To continue reading

Request your trial
6 cases
  • Kilgore v. Yarnell
    • United States
    • Oklahoma Supreme Court
    • July 13, 1909
    ...the 17th day of April, 1907, the plaintiff moved to reinstate said cause, which motion was denied. ¶9 In the case of Mawhinney et al. v. Doane et al., 40 Kan. 681, 20 P. 488, decided by the Supreme Court of that state prior to the adoption of the Civil Code of Procedure of Kansas by the Leg......
  • Berkley v. Tootle
    • United States
    • Missouri Supreme Court
    • May 14, 1901
    ... ... Chapman v. Chapman, 48 Kan. 636, 29 Pac. 1071; Mawhinney v. Doane, 40 Kan. 676, 17 Pac. 44; Id., 40 Kan. 681, 20 Pac. 488; Baker v. Hummer, 31 Kan. 325, 2 Pac. 808; Kothman v. Skaggs, 29 Kan. 5; Angell v ... ...
  • Chicago
    • United States
    • Kansas Supreme Court
    • March 9, 1889
    ... ... McDonnell , 39 Kan ... 669; same case, 18 P. Rep. 821; Markin v. Priddy , 40 ... Kan. 684; same case, 20 P. Rep. 474; Mawhinney v ... Doane , 40 Kan. 681; same case, 20 P. Rep. 488; Life ... Association v. Lemke , 40 Kan. 661; same case, 20 P. Rep ... 512; The State v ... ...
  • Edward Thompson Co. v. Bristow
    • United States
    • Oklahoma Supreme Court
    • March 2, 1926
    ...the name of the legal representative of a deceased party. The learned Justice, who prepared the opinion, cited approvingly Mawhinney v. Doane, 40 Kan. 681, 20 P. 488, where it was held that the judgment cannot be revived after the expiration of one year from the death of the judgment credit......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT