May v. State, 8 Div. 155
| Decision Date | 12 December 1963 |
| Docket Number | 8 Div. 155 |
| Citation | 277 Ala. 700,166 So.2d 865 |
| Parties | Carver David MAY v. STATE. |
| Court | Alabama Supreme Court |
Certiorari to Court of Appeals.
Jesse A. Keller, Florence, for petitioner.
Richmond M. Flowers, Atty. Gen., opposed.
Petition of Carver David May for certiorari to the Court of Appeals to review and revise the judgment and decision in May v. State, 166 So.2d 860 (8 Div. 848).
Writ denied.
To continue reading
Request your trial
12 cases
-
Favor v. State
...otherwise had. Diamond v. State, Ala.Cr.App., 363 So.2d 109 (1978), May v. State, 42 Ala.App. 401, 166 So.2d 860, cert. denied, 277 Ala. 700, 166 So.2d 865 (1963). IV Next, appellant submits that the trial court committed reversible error by denying repeated motions for mistrial based upon ......
-
Lawson v. State
...is clear that this is insufficient for review on appeal. See also May v. State, 42 Ala.App. 401, 166 So.2d 860, cert. denied, 277 Ala. 700, 166 So.2d 865 (1963), wherein the proper procedure for preservation of error for appeal occurring within closing argument is It is also apparent that, ......
-
Henry v. State
...274 So.2d 360, cert. denied, 290 Ala. 364, 274 So.2d 363 (1972); May v. State, 42 Ala.App. 401, 166 So.2d 860, cert. denied, 277 Ala. 700, 166 So.2d 865 (1963); White v. State, 41 Ala.App. 54, 123 So.2d 179, cert. denied, 271 Ala. 702, 123 So.2d 186 (1960). See also cases collected at 6A Al......
-
Mathis v. State
...jury to "disregard that line of argument" thus curing any error. May v. State, 42 Ala.App. 401, 166 So.2d 860, cert. denied, 277 Ala. 700, 166 So.2d 865 (1963). It should further be pointed out that statements of counsel in argument to the jury must be viewed as in the heat of debate, and s......
Request a trial to view additional results