Maya, et al. v. Centex Corp., et al.; Martinez, et al. v. D.R. Horton, Inc., et al.; Lumalu, et al. v. MDC Holdings, Inc., et al.; Stephens, et al. v. Lennar Corp., et al.; Kelly, et al. v. Beazer Homes USA, Inc., et al.; Nielson, et al. v. Shea Homes In
| Docket Number | 10-55658,10-55660,10-55662,10-55663,10-55664,10-55665,10-55667,10-55668 |
| Decision Date | 21 September 2011 |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
795 cases
-
In re Chrysler-Dodge-Jeep Ecodiesel Mktg.
...v. Kohl's Corp. , 718 F.3d 1098 (9th Cir. 2013) ; Mazza v. Am. Honda Motor Co. , 666 F.3d 581 (9th Cir. 2012) ; Maya v. Centex Corp. , 658 F.3d 1060 (9th Cir. 2011).In Hinojos , consumers alleged that they would not have purchased "on sale" merchandise, or would have paid less for it, had t......
-
Stasi v. Inmediata Health Grp. Corp.
...and alteration omitted). The question of standing is "distinct from the merits" of the plaintiff's claim. Maya v. Centex Corp. , 658 F.3d 1060, 1068 (9th Cir. 2011) ; see also Warth , 422 U.S. at 500, 95 S.Ct. 2197 ("[S]tanding in no way depends on the merits of the plaintiff's contention t......
-
Missud v. Oakland Coliseum Joint Venture
...state that standing is a jurisdictional question that precedes the merits of a plaintiff's claim. Id. at 13 (citing Maya v. Centex Corp., 658 F.3d 1060, 1068 (9th Cir. 2011)). Defendants elaborate that a plaintiff must demonstrate (1) that the plaintiff suffered an injury in fact; (2) that ......
-
GEO Grp., Inc. v. Newsom
...Sports Mgmt., Inc. v. Robles , No. 13-CV-00660-LHK, 2014 WL 129308, at *2 (N.D. Cal. Jan. 14, 2014) (citing Maya v. Centex Corp. , 658 F.3d 1060, 1067–68 (9th Cir. 2011) ; In re Seizure of One Blue Nissan Skyline Auto. , 683 F. Supp. 2d 1087, 1089 (C.D. Cal. 2010) ).12 Plaintiffs urge the C......
Get Started for Free
2 books & journal articles
-
Resolved: Is 46 U.S.C. [section] 30501(a) a Jurisdictional Statute of Limitations or a Mandatory Claims Processing Rule?
...392 F.3d 147, 149 (5th Cir. 2004); In re Eckstein Marine Serv., L.L.C., 672 F.3d 310, 319-320 (5th Cir. 2012); Maya v. Centex Corp., 658 F.3d 1060, 1067 (9th Cir. 2011); Safe Air for Everyone v. Meyer, 373 F.3d 1035, 1039 (9th Cir. (132) 2 Moore's Federal Practice--Civil [section] 12.30. (1......
-
The Rule of the Deal: Bankruptcy Bargains and Other Misnomers.
...certificate of appealability granted, No. 21 CV 7532 (CM), 2022 WL 121393 (S.D.N.Y. Jan. 7, 2022). (290) See, e.g, Maya v. Centex Corp., 658 F.3d 1060, 1068 (9th Cir. 2011) ("the threshold question of whether plaintiff has standing (and the court has jurisdiction) is distinct from the merit......