Mayflower Industries v. Thor Corporation

• Decision Date: 16 June 1952
• Docket Number: No. A--143,A--143
• Citation: 9 N.J. 605,89 A.2d 242
• Parties: MAYFLOWER INDUSTRIES, plaintiff-appellant, v. THOR CORPORATION, an Illinois corporation, and Teldisco, Inc., a New Jersey corporation, defendants-respondents.
• Court: New Jersey Supreme Court

Page 605

9 N.J. 605

89 A.2d 242

MAYFLOWER INDUSTRIES, plaintiff-appellant, v. THOR CORPORATION, an Illinois corporation, and Teldisco, Inc., a New Jersey corporation, defendants-respondents.

No. A--143.

Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Argued June 9, 1952.

Decided June 16, 1952.

On appeal from orders of the Superior Court, Chancery Division, to the Appellate Division and certified by the Supreme Court of its own motion. The opinions of the Chancery Division are reported at 15 N.J.Super. 139 and 337, 83 A.2d 246 and 83 A.2d 366.

Meyer E. Ruback, Newark, argued the cause for the appellant (Ruback, Albach & Weisman and Alfred C. Clapp, Newark, attorneys).

Thomas J. Brogan, Jersey City, argued the cause for the respondent Thor Corporation.

Sol D. Kapelsohn, Newark, argued the cause for the respondent Teldisco, Inc. (Kapelsohn, Lerner, Leuchter & Reitman, Newark, attorneys).

PER CURIAM.

The orders will be affirmed for the reasons expressed in the opinions of Judge Francis in the court below.

For affirmance: Chief Justice VANDERBILT and Justices OLIPHANT, WACHENFELD, BURLING, JACOBS and BRENNAN--6.

For reversal: None.