Mayhew v. State
Decision Date | 27 October 1920 |
Docket Number | 23,742 |
Citation | 128 N.E. 599,189 Ind. 545 |
Parties | Mayhew v. State of Indiana |
Court | Indiana Supreme Court |
From Marion Criminal Court (50,112); James A. Collins, Judge.
Prosecution by the State of Indiana against Elizabeth Mayhew. From a judgment of conviction, the defendant appeals.
Reversed.
Holmes & McAllister, for appellant.
Ele Stansbury, Attorney-General, and Remster A. Bingham, for the state.
The appellant was convicted in the criminal court of Marion county on a charge of contributing to the delinquency of a female child under the age of eighteen years. The judgment was that she pay a fine of $ 300 and costs, and be imprisoned in the correctional department of the Indiana Woman's Prison for a term of six months, and from such judgment she appeals and assigns as error that: (1) The court erred in overruling the appellant's motion to dismiss the affidavit and prosecution in this cause. (2) The court erred in overruling appellant's motion to quash the affidavit. (3) The court erred in overruling appellant's motion in arrest of judgment.
The affidavit which was filed in the juvenile court on July 28 1919, is as follows: "Orville Hudson, being duly sworn upon his oath says that he is informed and believes that Elizabeth Mayhew, late of Marion county, Indiana, did on or about the 28th day of July, 1919, and within said county and state, unlawfully cause and encourage one Elsa Gorham, a girl under the age of eighteen years to commit an act of delinquency, as defined in the statute in such case made and provided, in this, to wit: By then and there encouraging said Elsa Gorham to be guilty of indecent and immoral conduct, to wit, adultery and fornication and by then and there permitting said Elsa Gorham to enter and remain in a house of prostitution then and there situate and by then and there causing and encouraging said Elsa Gorham to associate with immoral persons, contrary to the form of the statute in such cases made and provided, and against the peace and dignity of the state of Indiana."
On July 29, 1919, the defendant filed an affidavit and motion for change of venue and in such affidavit asked that the venue be changed to the criminal court of Marion county, Indiana. The motion was sustained and the venue changed to the Marion Criminal Court September 2, 1919. On January 8, 1920, the defendant moved to dismiss the prosecution for the reason that the jurat to the affidavit filed in the juvenile court was insufficient. This motion was overruled. On the same day the affidavit was amended by the prosecuting attorney by reswearing affiant thereto, and attaching the jurat of such prosecutor to such amended affidavit.
The defendant then filed a motion to quash the amended affidavit for the reasons that: (1)
This motion being overruled by the court, the defendant waived arraignment and entered a plea of "not guilty," and on this issue appellant was tried.
The amendment of the affidavit by the prosecuting attorney was authorized by statute, § 2043 Burns 1914, Acts 1905 p. 584, § 172, and the court properly refused to dismiss the charge against the defendant on account of a defect in the jurat to the affidavit filed in the juvenile court.
The appellant's motion to quash assigns two of the causes named in § 2065 Burns 1914, Acts 1905 p. 584, § 194. The first cause named is that the facts stated in the affidavit do not constitute a public offense; the other that the affidavit does not state the offense with sufficient certainty.
This prosecution is founded upon §§ 1, 2, ch. 111, Acts 1917 p. 341, § 1641 Burns' Supp. 1918. Section 1 of said act provides:
Section 2 of said act (§ 1648 Burns' Supp. 1918) provides:
To continue reading
Request your trial