Mayola v. State

CourtSupreme Court of Alabama
Citation337 So.2d 107
PartiesIn re Michael A. MAYOLA, alias v. STATE. Ex parte STATE of Alabama ex rel. ATTORNEY GENERAL. SC 1899.
Decision Date27 August 1976

Page 107

337 So.2d 107
In re Michael A. MAYOLA, alias
v.
STATE.
Ex parte STATE of Alabama ex rel. ATTORNEY GENERAL.
SC 1899.
Supreme Court of Alabama.
Aug. 27, 1976.

Certiorari to the Court of Criminal Appeals.

William J. Baxley, Atty. Gen. and Jack Curtis, Asst. Atty. Gen., for the State.

None for respondent.

JONES, Justice.

Petition of the State by its Attorney General for Certiorari to the Court of Criminal Appeals to review and revise the judgment and decision of that Court in Mayola v. State, Ala.Cr.App., 337 So.2d 105.

WRIT DENIED.

HEFLIN, C.J., and MADDOX, SHORES and BEATTY, JJ., concur.

To continue reading

Request your trial
4 cases
  • McConico v. ALABAMA DEPT. OF CORRECTIONS
    • United States
    • Alabama Court of Criminal Appeals
    • April 30, 2004
    ...was by filing a petition for a writ of error coram nobis. See, e.g., Mayola v. State, 337 So.2d 105 (Ala.Crim.App.), cert. denied, 337 So.2d 107 (Ala.1976) (recognizing the writ of error coram nobis as a means of postconviction review). Thus, our jurisdiction to review postconviction writs ......
  • Bonman v. State, 6 Div. 836
    • United States
    • Alabama Court of Criminal Appeals
    • October 30, 1979
    ...of Mobile, Ala.Cr.App., 357 So.2d 675, cert. denied, 357 So.2d 680 (1978); Cf. Mayola v. State, Ala.Cr.App., 337 So.2d 105, cert. denied, 337 So.2d 107 The record also clearly shows that appellant was informed of his Miranda rights at the time of arrest and that the inculpatory statement ut......
  • Lewter v. State, 8 Div. 496
    • United States
    • Alabama Court of Criminal Appeals
    • June 23, 1981
    ...nobis as a means of post conviction review. Specifically, this court in Mayola v. State, 337 So.2d 105 (Ala.Cr.App.1976), cert. denied, 337 So.2d 107, (Ala.), pointed out the writ of error coram nobis filed in the circuit court Page 330 was the proper legal remedy with which to raise the al......
  • Beck v. ALABAMA BD. OF PARDONS AND PAROLES
    • United States
    • Alabama Court of Criminal Appeals
    • February 25, 2005
    ...was by filing a petition for a writ of error coram nobis. See, e.g., Mayola v. State, 337 So.2d 105 (Ala.Crim. App.), cert. denied, 337 So.2d 107 (Ala. 1976) (recognizing the writ of error coram nobis as a means of securing postconviction review). Thus, our jurisdiction to review postconvic......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT