Mayola v. State
Court | Supreme Court of Alabama |
Citation | 337 So.2d 107 |
Parties | In re Michael A. MAYOLA, alias v. STATE. Ex parte STATE of Alabama ex rel. ATTORNEY GENERAL. SC 1899. |
Decision Date | 27 August 1976 |
Page 107
v.
STATE.
Ex parte STATE of Alabama ex rel. ATTORNEY GENERAL.
Certiorari to the Court of Criminal Appeals.
William J. Baxley, Atty. Gen. and Jack Curtis, Asst. Atty. Gen., for the State.
None for respondent.
JONES, Justice.
Petition of the State by its Attorney General for Certiorari to the Court of Criminal Appeals to review and revise the judgment and decision of that Court in Mayola v. State, Ala.Cr.App., 337 So.2d 105.
WRIT DENIED.
HEFLIN, C.J., and MADDOX, SHORES and BEATTY, JJ., concur.
To continue reading
Request your trial4 cases
-
McConico v. ALABAMA DEPT. OF CORRECTIONS
...was by filing a petition for a writ of error coram nobis. See, e.g., Mayola v. State, 337 So.2d 105 (Ala.Crim.App.), cert. denied, 337 So.2d 107 (Ala.1976) (recognizing the writ of error coram nobis as a means of postconviction review). Thus, our jurisdiction to review postconviction writs ......
-
Bonman v. State, 6 Div. 836
...of Mobile, Ala.Cr.App., 357 So.2d 675, cert. denied, 357 So.2d 680 (1978); Cf. Mayola v. State, Ala.Cr.App., 337 So.2d 105, cert. denied, 337 So.2d 107 The record also clearly shows that appellant was informed of his Miranda rights at the time of arrest and that the inculpatory statement ut......
-
Lewter v. State, 8 Div. 496
...nobis as a means of post conviction review. Specifically, this court in Mayola v. State, 337 So.2d 105 (Ala.Cr.App.1976), cert. denied, 337 So.2d 107, (Ala.), pointed out the writ of error coram nobis filed in the circuit court Page 330 was the proper legal remedy with which to raise the al......
-
Beck v. ALABAMA BD. OF PARDONS AND PAROLES
...was by filing a petition for a writ of error coram nobis. See, e.g., Mayola v. State, 337 So.2d 105 (Ala.Crim. App.), cert. denied, 337 So.2d 107 (Ala. 1976) (recognizing the writ of error coram nobis as a means of securing postconviction review). Thus, our jurisdiction to review postconvic......