Mayor v. Reynolds

Decision Date04 March 1907
CitationThe Mayor, &C., of The Borough of Park Ridge v. Reynolds, 65 A. 990, 74 N.J.L. 449 (N.J. 1907)
PartiesMAYOR, ETC., OF BOROUGH OF PARK RIDGE v. REYNOLDS et al.
CourtNew Jersey Supreme Court

(Syllabus by the Court.)

Error to Supreme Court.

Action by the mayor, etc., of the borough of Park Ridge against N. A. Reynolds and others.From a judgment in favor of defendants, plaintiff brings error.Affirmed.

See62 Atl. 190.

Reuben M. Hart, for plaintiff in error.Edmund W. Wakelee and Wendell J. Wright, for defendants in error.

MAGIE, Ch.The judgment of the Supreme Court brought before us by this writ affirmed an order for a summary investigation into the affairs of the borough of Park Ridge, made by a justice of the Supreme Court, under the provisions of a supplement to an act entitled "An act to provide for the summary investigation of county and municipal expenditures," approved February 18, 1879, which supplement was approved March 23, 1898(Laws 1898, p. 155, c. 97), and a subsequent order dismissing a petition to vacate the previous order and denying its prayer.These orders were taken to the Supreme Court by certiorari, and it was there held that a justice of the Supreme Court, in acting upon applications for summary investigation under the provisions of the act above referred to, is not required to institute inquiry into the truth of the facts sworn to in the jurisdictional affidavit upon which he makes the order for such investigation.

We are unable to approve the view that the Supreme Court justice who has directed the investigation may not be required to institute an inquiry into the truth of the affidavit upon which his jurisdiction has been invoked, at least to the extent of discovering whether he has been imposed upon.But the judgment of the Supreme Court affirming the orders complained of was evidently correct The affidavit upon which the first order for an investigation was made was...

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
15 cases
  • Burlington County Bd. of Chosen Freeholders, Application of
    • United States
    • New Jersey Supreme Court
    • May 6, 1985
    ...See Application of Ries, supra, 20 N.J. 140, 119 A.2d 16; Tiene v. Jersey City, 13 N.J. 478, 100 A.2d 518 (1953); Park Ridge v. Reynolds, 74 N.J.L. 449, 65 A. 990 (E. & A.1907); In re Wellhofer, supra, 137 N.J.L. 165, 59 A.2d 393; In re Wellhofer, 137 N.J.L. 342, 60 A.2d 247 (Sup.Ct.1948); ......
  • Tiene, Application of
    • United States
    • New Jersey Supreme Court
    • June 27, 1955
    ...v. Gough, 107 N.J.L. 424, 154 A. 113 (Sup.Ct.1931); Hoboken v. O'Neil, 74 N.J.L. 57, 64 A. 981 (Sup.Ct.1906); Park Ridge v. Reynolds, 74 N.J.L. 449, 65 A. 990 (E. & A.1906). Cf. In re Frey, 93 A.2d 594, 26 N.J.Misc. 193 (O. & An unlimited inquisition is never permissible and will not be cou......
  • Tiene v. Jersey City
    • United States
    • New Jersey Supreme Court
    • November 9, 1953
    ...v. Parker, (119 N.J.L. 225, 195 A. 296 (Sup.Ct.1937)); Hoboken v. O'Neill, 74 N.J.L. 57, 64 A. 981 (Sup.Ct.1906); Park Ridge v. Reynolds, 74 N.J.L. 449, 65 A. 990 (E. & A.1906).' But the city nevertheless contends that the assignment judge was without power under L.1948, c. 375, sec. 1(i) (......
  • Ries, Application of
    • United States
    • New Jersey Supreme Court
    • December 12, 1955
    ...any, should be limited to the determination of whether or not the court is being imposed upon by the petitioners, Park Ridge v. Reynolds, 74 N.J.L. 449, 65 A. 990 (E. & A.1906). Nothing more is required to weigh the discretion of the trial judge in favor of the investigation than proof of t......
  • Get Started for Free