McAndrew v. Mularchuk

CourtUnited States State Supreme Court (New Jersey)
Citation154 A.2d 672,30 N.J. 600
PartiesWilliam F. McANDREW et al., Plaintiffs-Respondents, v. Andrew MULARCHUK et al., Defendants-Petitioners.
Decision Date05 October 1959

Page 600

30 N.J. 600
154 A.2d 672
William F. McANDREW et al., Plaintiffs-Respondents,
v.
Andrew MULARCHUK et al., Defendants-Petitioners.
Supreme Court of New Jersey.
Oct. 5, 1959.

On petition for certification to Superior Court, Appellate Division.

See same case below: 56 N.J.Super. 219, 152 A.2d 372.

Townsend & Doyle, Jersey City, for the petitioners.

Milton, McNulty & Augelli, Jersey City, for the respondents.

Granted.

To continue reading

Request your trial
1 practice notes
  • McAndrew v. Mularchuk, No. A--69
    • United States
    • United States State Supreme Court (New Jersey)
    • June 28, 1960
    ...police duties while carrying such a dangerous instrument. We granted certification because of the importance of the problem involved. 30 N.J. 600, 154 A.2d 672 In 1926 Keansburg, by ordinance, established a police department to consist of a 'Chief of Police, two Sergeants, and such number o......
1 cases
  • McAndrew v. Mularchuk, No. A--69
    • United States
    • United States State Supreme Court (New Jersey)
    • June 28, 1960
    ...police duties while carrying such a dangerous instrument. We granted certification because of the importance of the problem involved. 30 N.J. 600, 154 A.2d 672 In 1926 Keansburg, by ordinance, established a police department to consist of a 'Chief of Police, two Sergeants, and such number o......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT