McBride v. Lomheim
Decision Date | 08 August 1966 |
Docket Number | No. 10248,10248 |
Citation | 82 S.D. 263,144 N.W.2d 564 |
Parties | Anna C. McBRIDE, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. Henry C. LOMHEIM, Defendant and Respondent. |
Court | South Dakota Supreme Court |
Neumayr & Jones, Gettysburg, for plaintiff and appellant.
Stephens, Riter, Mayer & Hofer, Pierre, for defendant and respondent.
On June 4, 1942, Anne C. Lomheim, now Anne C. McBride, obtained a divorce from the defendant in the circuit court of Sully County and the exclusive care and custody of the minor daughters, Marcella Anne, ten, Alice, eight, and Charlotte, six. The decree further provided as follows:
An order modifying the divorce decree was entered November 23, 1943. The material portions of this order read:
The daughter, Marcella Anne, is substantially handicapped. The court found that she has been afflicted with spastic paralysis since birth, has never walked and is an invalid and unable to support herself.
In September 1943, defendant sought a modification of the divorce decree. He asked that 'the Court modify its judgment and decree to the end that there be a more equitable and a fairer distribution of the said property, and that this defendant be given a part thereof' or that in the alternative 'the Court modify said judgment to provide that the proceeds to be derived from the estate of James C. Lomheim, deceased, be placed in trust with some trustee, to be distributed in such amounts and at such times as the Court may require to safeguard said funds for the benefit of the life, health and education of said minor children'. Plaintiff filed an affidavit in opposition to the motion. She therein stated that The parties seemingly recognized that the obligation to support the children rested with their parents and that the court was charged with the duty of enforcing such responsibility. On November 23, 1943, the judgment in the...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Parrish v. Parrish, Docket No. 70781
...219, 598 P.2d 1115 (1979); Feinberg v. Diamant, 378 Mass. 131, 389 N.E.2d 998 (1979) (recognizing this principle); McBride v. Lomheim, 82 S.D. 263, 144 N.W.2d 564 (1966); Fincham v. Levin, 155 So.2d 883 (Fla.App.1963); Maitzen v. Maitzen, 24 Ill.App.2d 32, 163 N.E.2d 840 (1959); Zakrocki v.......
-
Kamp v. Kamp
...953, 113 A.L.R. 889 (1937) (statutory grant of power is not limitation on court's independent equitable powers), and McBride v. Lomheim, 82 S.D. 263, 144 N.W.2d 564 (1966) (parent's liability to support substantially handicapped daughter may be enforced in divorce My affirmance is for the r......
-
Jameson v. Jameson
...Such liability of the father and mother is joint and several and continues notwithstanding that there is a divorce. McBride v. Lomheim, 82 S.D. 263, 144 N.W.2d 564 (1966); Tesch v. Tesch, 65 S.D. 637, 277 N.W. 328 (1938). In this state, it may be enforced in a divorce decree. Mower v. Mower......
-
Eggers v. Eggers
...of a new action. Houghton v. Houghton, 37 S.D. 184, 157 N.W. 316; Atwood v. Atwood, 253 Minn. 185, 91 N.W.2d 728. See also McBride v. Lomheim, S.D., 144 N.W.2d 564. An application for modification of an allowance of alimony or support money or an application to obtain payments under a decre......