McBride v. Port Authority of New York and New Jersey

Citation295 N.J.Super. 521,685 A.2d 520
PartiesDaniel McBRIDE and Helena McBride, his wife, Plaintiffs-Respondents, v. PORT AUTHORITY OF NEW YORK AND NEW JERSEY, Defendant-Appellant.
Decision Date06 December 1996
CourtNew Jersey Superior Court – Appellate Division

Philip L. Geibel, Secaucus, argued the cause for appellant (Stevens & Minter, attorneys; Mr. Geibel, on the brief).

Charles R. Cohen, West Caldwell, argued the cause for respondents (Pearl, Levy and Cohen, attorneys; Mr. Cohen, on the brief).

Before Judges MICHELS, MUIR, Jr., and COBURN.

The opinion of the court was delivered by

COBURN, J.S.C. (temporarily assigned).

The dispositive issue posed by this appeal is whether an employee of a commercial tenant in exclusive possession may hold the tenant's landlord responsible for personal injuries suffered on the leased premises, due to a lack of proper maintenance or repair, when the lease unquestionably places responsibility for such maintenance or repair solely upon the tenant. Since we are convinced there is no landlord liability in such circumstances, we reverse the judgment obtained as a result of the jury's verdict for plaintiffs and remand for entry of a judgment in favor of defendant.

On February 18, 1964, defendant Port Authority of New York and New Jersey entered into a lease with Hudson Refrigerating Company. The leased premises consisted of about 60 acres of land and a 300,000 square foot warehouse. This lease, which continued to govern the parties' rights at all times relevant to this action, provided:

SECTION 7. Maintenance and Repair

(a) The Lessee shall at all times keep the premises clean, and in an orderly condition and appearance, together with all the fixtures, equipment and personal property of the Lessee located in or on the premises.

(b) The lessee shall repair, replace, rebuild and paint all or any part of the premises which may be damaged or destroyed by the acts or omissions of the Lessee or by those of its officers, employees or of other persons on or at the premises with the consent of the Lessee.

(c) With respect to all parts of the premises, including, but without limitation thereto, such of the following as are or may be during the term of the letting located in or on the premises: fences, the exterior and interior of the building walls, the exterior and interior and operating mechanisms of and attachments to windows and skylights, screens, roofs, foundations, steel work, columns, the exterior and interior and operating mechanisms of and attachments to doors, partitions, floors, ceilings, inside and outside paved and unpaved areas, glass of every kind, and the utility, mechanical, electrical and other systems, the Lessee shall take the same good care of the premises that would be taken by a reasonably prudent owner who desired to keep and maintain the same so that at the expiration or termination of the letting and at all times during the letting, the same (or a reconstruction of all or any part thereof) will be in a good condition as at the commencement thereof (or, in the case of improvements made during the letting hereunder in as good condition as at the time of the installation or construction thereof), except for reasonable wear which does not adversely affect the watertight condition or structural integrity of the building or other structures on the premises or adversely affect the efficient or the proper utilization of any part of the premises. To that end, the Lessee shall make frequent periodic inspections and, from time to time as the necessity therefor arises and regardless of the cause of the condition requiring the same, the Lessee shall perform all necessary preventive maintenance including but not limited to painting (the exterior of the building, areas of joint or common use and areas visible to the general public to be painted in colors which have been approved by the Port Authority), and, except under circumstances as set forth in paragraph (a) of Section 8 of these Terms and Conditions, the Lessee shall make all necessary repairs and replacements and do all necessary rebuilding with respect to all parts of the premises, all of which shall be in quality equal to the original in materials and workmanship and regardless of whether such repairs and replacements are structural or non-structural, ordinary or extraordinary, foreseen or unforeseen. The Lessee shall commence to perform each of its obligations hereunder within twenty days after notice from the Port Authority and shall thereafter continue the same to completion with reasonable diligence.

SECTION 13. Rights of Entry Reserved

(a) The Port Authority, by its officers, employees, agents, representatives and contractors shall have the right at all reasonable times to enter upon the premises for the purpose of inspecting the same, for observing the performance by the Lessee of its obligations under this Agreement, and for the doing of any act or thing which the Port Authority may be obligated or have the right to do under this Agreement or otherwise.

(b) Without limiting the generality of the foregoing, the Port Authority, by its officers, employees, agents, representatives, and contractors, and furnishers of utilities and other services, shall have the right, for its own benefit, for the benefit of the Lessee, or for the benefit of others than the Lessee at the Facility, to maintain existing and future utility, mechanical, electrical and other systems and to enter upon the premises at all reasonable times to make such repairs, replacements or alterations as may, in the opinion of the Port Authority, be deemed necessary or advisable and, from time to time, to construct or install over, in or under the premises new systems or parts thereof, and to use the premises for access to other parts of the Facility otherwise not conveniently accessible; provided, however, that in the exercise of such rights of access, repair, alteration or new construction the Port Authority shall not unreasonably interfere with the use and occupancy of the premises by the Lessee.

* * * * * *

(d) Nothing in this Section shall or shall be construed to impose upon the Port Authority any obligations so to construct or maintain or to make repairs, replacements, alterations or additions, or shall create any liability for any failure so to do. The Lessee is and shall be in exclusive control and possession of the premises and the Port Authority shall not in any event be liable for any injury or damage to any property or to any person happening on or about the premises nor for any injury or damage to the premises nor to any property of the Lessee or of any other person located in or thereon (other than those occasioned by the acts of the Port Authority).

For purposes of this appeal, we will assume there was sufficient evidence to...

To continue reading

Request your trial
20 cases
  • Shields v. Ramslee Motors
    • United States
    • New Jersey Supreme Court
    • 23 Enero 2020
    ...Jersey courts have distinguished between the right to enter and a covenant to repair. See, e.g., McBride v. Port Auth. of N.Y. & N.J., 295 N.J. Super. 521, 525, 685 A.2d 520 (App. Div. 1996). In light of that distinction, "plaintiff['s] thesis that a commercial landlord should be held respo......
  • Leonard v. Golden Touch Transp. of N.Y., Inc.
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — District of New Jersey
    • 18 Noviembre 2015
    ...landlords which may not be avoided by lease provisions,‘ New Jersey courts have not. McBride v. Port Authority of New York and New Jersey , 295 N.J.Super. 521, 526, 685 A.2d 520 (N.J.App.Div.1996) (citing Milacci v. Mato Realty Co. , 217 N.J.Super. 297, 301, 525 A.2d 1120 (N.J.App.Div.1987)......
  • Fagan v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — District of New Jersey
    • 29 Junio 2021
    ... ... New Jersey June 29, 2021 ... REPORT AND ... circumstances”); McBride v. Port Auth. of N.Y. and ... N.J. , 685 A.2d 520, ... ...
  • Winkler v. Motter
    • United States
    • New Jersey Superior Court
    • 7 Febrero 1997
    ...were leased. This ruling is clearly distinguishable from the Appellate Division's recent decision in McBride v. Port Auth. Of N.Y. and NJ, 295 N.J.Super. 521, 685 A.2d 520 (App.Div.1996). In McBride, the plaintiff was injured when the vehicle he was driving on his employer's loading dock st......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT