Mccallion v. Allan.

Decision Date07 June 1946
Docket NumberNo. 227.,227.
Citation134 N.J.L. 322,47 A.2d 602
PartiesMcCALLION et al. v. ALLAN.
CourtNew Jersey Supreme Court
OPINION TEXT STARTS HERE

Certiorari by Joseph A. McCallion, James P. Lannon and Leonard Schlick against Donald Allan, superintendent of elections of Hudson county, to review an order by respondent dismissing prosecutors from their employment on the ground that dismissal violated veterans' tenure statutes.

Writ dismissed.

January term, 1946, before DONGES, HEHER and COLIE, JJ.

T. James Tumulty, of Jersey City (Ezra L. Nolan, of Jersey City, of counsel), for prosecutors.

Michael G. Comunale, of Jersey City (Frank J. V. Gimino, of Jersey City, of counsel), for respondent.

COLIE, Justice.

Each of the prosecutors is a veteran of the first world war and each was employed by the Hudson County Board of Elections as Assistant Custodian and Mechanic in its Warehouse Division. By Chapter 56 of the Laws of 1945, R.S. 19:48-4, N.J.S.A., was amended to place voting machines in first-class counties in the custody of the Superintendent of Elections. At the times with which we are dealing, the respondent, Donald Allan, was Superintendent of Elections of Hudson County and empowered by R.S. 19:32-2, N.J.S.A., to ‘appoint * * * any other assistants he considers necessary to carry out the provisions of this title, and may remove the same whenever he deems it necessary. Those so appointed shall not be subject to any of the provisions of Title 11, Civil Service, but shall be in the unclassified service.’

On August 1, 1945 each of the prosecutors received a letter from the Superintendent of Elections, advising him that his services would be terminated as of August 15, 1945. By written stipulation it was agreed between the attorneys of the respective parties that ‘the sole question herein is whether the prosecutors had such an employment as entitled them to the protection of the provisions of R.S. 38:16-1.’ That statute provides that any person holding a position or office under the government of any county whose term of office is not fixed by law and who receives a salary from the county and who has been honorably discharged from the service of the United States, shall not be removed except for good cause shown after a fair and impartial hearing, but shall hold his position during a good behavior. A veterans' tenure statute, substantially the same as R.S. 38:16-1, N.J.S.A., has been on the statute books since 1907 and the benefits extended thereby are not to be taken away without sound reason therefor.

R.S 19:32-1 et seq., N.J.S.A., had its source in Chapter 9, Laws of 1923, which in turn was a supplement to Chapter 139 of the Laws of 1898, entitled ‘An Act to regulate elections (Revision of 1898).’ The 1923 statute above referred to created for counties of the first class a new office, known as Superintendent of Elections, and enumerated his powers and duties. Among the former, the legislature gave to him power to ‘appoint a chief deputy, a clerk, a secretary and such other...

To continue reading

Request your trial
7 cases
  • Cetrulo v. Byrne
    • United States
    • New Jersey Supreme Court
    • 11 Enero 1960
    ...v. Miele, 6 N.J. 139, 77 A.2d 895 (1951); Carluccio v. Ferber, 18 N.J.Super. 473, 87 A.2d 439 (App.Div.1952); McCallion v. Allan, 134 N.J.L. 322, 47 A.2d 602 (Sup.Ct.1946); Di Angelo v. Keenen, 112 N.J.L. 19, 169 A. 728 (Sup.Ct.1933), affirmed 115 N.J.L. 507, 181 A. 44 (E. & A.1935). See al......
  • Brennan v. Byrne
    • United States
    • New Jersey Supreme Court
    • 11 Enero 1960
    ...v. Miele, 6 N.J. 139, 77 A.2d 895 (1951); Carluccio v. Ferber, 18 N.J.Super. 473, 87 A.2d 439 (App.Div.1952); McCallion v. Allan, 134 N.J.L. 322, 47 A.2d 602 (Sup.Ct.1946); Ackley v. Norcross, 122 N.J.L. 569, 6 A.2d 721 (Sup.Ct.1939), affirmed 124 N.J.L. 133, 11 A.2d 106 (E. & A.1940); Roth......
  • Barringer v. Miele, A--59
    • United States
    • New Jersey Supreme Court
    • 8 Enero 1951
    ...of the Veterans' Tenure Act. Di Angelo v. Keenen, 112 N.J.L. 19, 169 A. 728 (Sup.Ct. 1933). As interpreted in McCallion v. Allan, 134 N.J.L. 322, 47 A.2d 602 (Sup.Ct. 1946), the statute operates to give the superintendent the power of removal of employees unrestrained by the provisions of t......
  • Kessler v. Minard
    • United States
    • New Jersey Supreme Court
    • 14 Noviembre 1946
    ...This is not a case where the Legislature expressed an intent to change an entire agency charged with a legal duty as in McCallion v. Allan, 134 N.J.L. 322, 47 A.2d 602, but merely a case where a county employee was appointed to perform duties in the office of the Prosecutor of the Pleas for......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT