McCallister v. Sigler
| Decision Date | 13 November 1888 |
| Docket Number | 13,461 |
| Parties | McCallister et al. v. Sigler |
| Court | Indiana Supreme Court |
From the Huntington Circuit Court.
Judgment affirmed.
J. C. Branyan, M. L. Spencer, R. A. Kaufman and W. A. Branyan, for appellants.
L. P. Milligan and O. W. Whitelock, for appellee.
The appellee claimed the property in controversy as exempt from execution. This claim is resisted by the appellants on the ground that the property was partnership property, and can not be claimed under the exemption law. We can not sustain the appellants' contention, for there is evidence showing that the property belonged to the appellee, and not to the firm of which he was a member.
The case falls within the rule that the finding of the trial court will not be disturbed where there is evidence sustaining it.
Judgment affirmed.
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
McCallister v. Sigler
...116 Ind. 47618 N.E. 464McCallister et al.v.Sigler.Supreme Court of Indiana.November 13, Appeal from circuit court, Huntington county; H. B. Sayler, Judge.*464Branyan, Spencer, Kaufman & Branyan, for appellants. Milligan & Whitelock, for appellee.Elliott, J. The appellee claimed the property......