McCarthy v. City of Murdo
Decision Date | 02 January 1942 |
Docket Number | 8429. |
Parties | McCARTHY v. CITY OF MURDO et al. |
Court | South Dakota Supreme Court |
Tom Kirby, of Sioux Falls, for appellants.
Morgan & Whiting and H. T. Fuller, all of Mitchell, for respondent.
In this case a rehearing was granted. In the former opinion which appears in 297 N.W. 790, the court failed to consider certain statutory provisions which are urged by the respondent as being controlling in the present dispute. The respondent cites and relies especially upon SDC 45.0201(88) and 45.1501. It appears from the record that the injury upon which the claim for compensation is based occurred October 10, 1938 which was before the effective date of the Code of 1939 and of course, the Code sections are not applicable. These Code sections find their source in Chapter 235, Laws of 1925 which was the law in effect at the time Mr. McCarthy was injured. This law is as follows: ...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Elfert v. Witt
... ... denying a new trial unless it appears that the verdict was ... affected thereby. Grantz v. City of Deadwood, 20 S.D. 495, ... 107 N.W. 832; see also 39 Am.Jur., New Trial, § 78. Much must ... ...
-
Bandt v. Farmers Co-op. El. Co.
... ... Radke et al., 67 SD 212, 291 NW 585; McCarthy v. City of Murdo et al., 68 SD 271, 297 NW 790. In the Cockran-Rice case it was said [26 SD 393, ... ...
- Froke v. Watertown Gas Co.