McCaskill v. State, No. 45492

CourtUnited States State Supreme Court of Mississippi
Writing for the CourtINZER
Citation227 So.2d 847
PartiesLuther W. McCASKILL v. STATE of Mississippi.
Docket NumberNo. 45492
Decision Date03 November 1969

Page 847

227 So.2d 847
Luther W. McCASKILL
v.
STATE of Mississippi.
No. 45492.
Supreme Court of Mississippi.
Nov. 3, 1969.

Page 848

Semmes Luckett, Leon L. Porter, Jr., Clarksdale, for appellant.

A. F. Summer, Atty. Gen., by G. Garland Lyell, Jr., Asst. Atty. Gen., Jackson, for appellee.

INZER, Justice:

This is an appeal by Luther W. McCaskill, a medical doctor, who was indicted, tried and convicted in the Circuit Court of Coahoma County for the crime of murder under the provisions of Section 2223, Mississippi Code 1942 Annotated (Supp.1966). He was sentenced to life imprisonment in the State Penitentiary. We reverse and remand.

Since we are reversing and remanding this case for another trial, we will only detail so much of the evidence as is necessary to dispose of this appeal. The proof on behalf of the State established that the deceased, Imogene Flowers Hurt, a resident of Greenwood, Mississippi, died on December 11, 1967, at the clinic operated by appellant in Clarksdale, Mississippi. An autopsy performed five days later revealed that she died as a result of infection and hemorrhage from a laceration of the cervix which is the exit from the womb. It was the opinion of the doctor who performed the autopsy that the laceration was caused in the removal of a fetus from the womb. It was also his opinion that the abortion occurred at least twenty-four hours prior to the death and that it could have happened as long as ten to fourteen days before death. He found no evidence of occlusion of the heart.

It was also established that the deceased was informed by her family physician early in October that she was pregnant and that she left Greenwood on Thursday afternoon,

Page 849

December 7, after telling her mother that she was going to Clarksdale to attend a wedding party. The following day she talked to her mother in a collect telephone call. Her mother did not hear from her on Saturday and on Sunday her mother placed a call to a number she found in her daughter's room. When the number was reached she was given another number to call and upon calling she reached Dr. McCaskill and asked to speak to her daughter. The doctor first said that she was not a patient there, but when Mrs. Flowers insisted that she wanted to talk to her daughter, he said wait a minute and he would check. Her daughter then answered the telephone and over the objection of appellant, Mrs. Flowers was allowed to testify that she asked her daughter if she was all right and that her daughter replied, 'yes, I am all right.' Then Mrs. Flowers asked her if she was sure and her daughter then said, 'yes, I am sure. You know that-of my pregnancy-and I am up here to the doctor getting something done about it.' Mrs. Flowers said she talked with Dr. McCaskill on Monday and he told her that her daughter was all right and would be home the following day. The next day she learned of her daughter's death.

Dr. McCaskill testified in his own behalf and denied he performed an abortion on the deceased. He said that he first saw the deceased on Saturday about 5 P.M. prior to her death on Monday. She told him that she had been pregnant and that a doctor in her area had performed an abortion on her. She gave the doctor a history of having had numerous pelvic infections. His examination of her at that time revealed that her blood pressure was high and that her temperature was elevated. She complained of pains in her stomach and when he touched her stomach he found it to be very tender. He said this indicated that she had a pelvic inflammatory disease. He also found that she was nervous and had palpitation of the heart. He treated her by giving dextrose and a combination of streptomycin any penicillin intravenously. After a few hours she was much improved and she left the clinic. He testified that he did not see her again until Monday afternoon about thirty minutes after he came to work. At that time he examined her in the presence of his nurse. He said she told him that she had been bleeding from the vagina and that his manual examination revealed that she had a ragged cervix and he felt what was probably a tear on the right side of the cervix. He found her heart to be very rapid and her blood pressure to be elevated. She was short of breath and was coughing frequently. He treated her as he had done on the previous occasion by giving her fluid intravenously. Shortly before she died she called him and told him that she was very warm and felt faint, and asked for water. She was short of breath and complained of pain in the chest area; she was restless and he gave her demerol for chest pain. She seemed to improve for a minute or two and her pulse became very irregular and she said she was smothering. She stopped breathing and he gave her adrenalin and mouth to mouth resuscitation in an effort to revive her. He testified that it was his opinion that her death was caused by a coronary occlusion. He denied that he talked with Mrs. Flowers on Sunday but admitted that she called him on Monday and that he told her that her daughter was all right and that she should be home the following day.

Appellant's assignment of errors is as follows:

(1) in permitting the indictment, trial and conviction of appellant under that provision of Section 2223 of the Code of 1942, Recompiled, which purports to make the death of a mother resulting from an illegal abortion the crime of murder, because said part of said section is unconstitutional, null and void because the amendatory act by which it was sought to icnorporate that change into the statute did not conform to constitutional requirements; (2) in granting the state's instructions which omitted the

Page 850

necessary qualification, since the case against appellant depended entirely upon circumstantial evidence, that the state's...

To continue reading

Request your trial
18 practice notes
  • In re Miss. Rules Evidence, No. 89-R-99002-SCT
    • United States
    • United States State Supreme Court of Mississippi
    • June 16, 2016
    ...much of the justified criticism regarding res gestae. For criticism in Mississippi of the res gestae concept, see McCaskill v. State, 227 So. 2d 847 (Miss. 1969); Masonite Corp. v. International Woodworkers, 215 So. 2d 691 (Miss. 1968); Barton and Cowart, "The Enigma of Hearsay," ......
  • Pro-Choice Mississippi v. Fordice, PRO-CHOICE
    • United States
    • United States State Supreme Court of Mississippi
    • August 13, 1998
    ...The State further asserts that this Court has sanctioned criminal action against doctors performing abortions. See McCaskill v. State, 227 So.2d 847 (Miss.1969); Mississippi State Board of Health v. Johnson, 197 Miss. 417, 19 So.2d 445 (1944) (abortion illegally administered because woman's......
  • Jones v. State, No. 50944
    • United States
    • United States State Supreme Court of Mississippi
    • January 30, 1980
    ...the accused results from undue constraint on the defense or undue lack of constraint on the prosecution. See, e. g., McCaskill v. State, 227 So.2d 847 (Miss.1969); Leverett v. State, 112 Miss. 394, 73 So. 273 Appellant complains that the trial court did not permit him to inquire of the pros......
  • Simon v. State, No. 91-DP-00353-SCT
    • United States
    • United States State Supreme Court of Mississippi
    • February 20, 1997
    ...case at bar. Williams v. State, 544 So.2d 782, 784 (Miss.1987); Murphy v. State, 246 So.2d 920, 921 (Miss.1971); McCaskill v. State, 227 So.2d 847, 852 (Miss.1969); Phenizee v. State, 180 Miss. 746, 178 So. 579, 582 The line between a proper and improper question is not always easily drawn;......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
18 cases
  • In re Miss. Rules Evidence, No. 89-R-99002-SCT
    • United States
    • United States State Supreme Court of Mississippi
    • June 16, 2016
    ...much of the justified criticism regarding res gestae. For criticism in Mississippi of the res gestae concept, see McCaskill v. State, 227 So. 2d 847 (Miss. 1969); Masonite Corp. v. International Woodworkers, 215 So. 2d 691 (Miss. 1968); Barton and Cowart, "The Enigma of Hearsay," ......
  • Pro-Choice Mississippi v. Fordice, PRO-CHOICE
    • United States
    • United States State Supreme Court of Mississippi
    • August 13, 1998
    ...The State further asserts that this Court has sanctioned criminal action against doctors performing abortions. See McCaskill v. State, 227 So.2d 847 (Miss.1969); Mississippi State Board of Health v. Johnson, 197 Miss. 417, 19 So.2d 445 (1944) (abortion illegally administered because woman's......
  • Jones v. State, No. 50944
    • United States
    • United States State Supreme Court of Mississippi
    • January 30, 1980
    ...the accused results from undue constraint on the defense or undue lack of constraint on the prosecution. See, e. g., McCaskill v. State, 227 So.2d 847 (Miss.1969); Leverett v. State, 112 Miss. 394, 73 So. 273 Appellant complains that the trial court did not permit him to inquire of the pros......
  • Simon v. State, No. 91-DP-00353-SCT
    • United States
    • United States State Supreme Court of Mississippi
    • February 20, 1997
    ...case at bar. Williams v. State, 544 So.2d 782, 784 (Miss.1987); Murphy v. State, 246 So.2d 920, 921 (Miss.1971); McCaskill v. State, 227 So.2d 847, 852 (Miss.1969); Phenizee v. State, 180 Miss. 746, 178 So. 579, 582 The line between a proper and improper question is not always easily drawn;......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT