McClanahan v. Hill
Decision Date | 25 May 2005 |
Citation | 112 P.3d 456,200 Or. App. 9 |
Parties | Terry D. McCLANAHAN, Appellant, v. Jean HILL, Superintendent, Eastern Oregon Correctional Institution, Respondent. |
Court | Oregon Court of Appeals |
Terry D. McClanahan filed the briefs pro se for petitioner.
Hardy Myers, Attorney General, Mary H. Williams, Solicitor General, and Daniel J. Casey, Assistant Attorney General, filed the briefs for respondent.
Before HASELTON, Presiding Judge, and LINDER and ORTEGA, Judges.
Petitioner appeals from the post-conviction court's denial of his petition for post-conviction relief, making several arguments in his appellate brief. We reject those arguments without discussion. Petitioner also has filed a supplemental brief in which he asserts that the stipulated departure sentence on his conviction for first-degree manslaughter is unconstitutional under Blakely v. Washington, 542 U.S. 296, 124 S.Ct. 2531, 159 L.Ed.2d 403 (2004), and Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466, 120 S.Ct. 2348, 147 L.Ed.2d 435 (2000).
We reject petitioner's argument because the principles announced by the Court in Blakely and Apprendi do not apply retroactively in a collateral proceeding such as this one. Page v. Palmateer, 336 Or. 379, 84 P.3d 133, cert. den., ___ U.S. ___, 125 S.Ct. 205, 160 L.Ed.2d 110 (2004); Makinson v. Lampert, 199 Or.App. 418, 112 P.3d 365 (2005); see also Schriro v. Summerlin, 542 U.S. 348, 124 S.Ct. 2519, 159 L.Ed.2d 442 (2004)
(. )
Affirmed.
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Peralta-Basilio v. Hill
... ... Page v. Palmateer, 336 Or. 379, 84 P.3d 133, cert. den., ___ U.S. ___, 125 S.Ct. 205, 160 L.Ed.2d 110 (2004); Makinson v. Lampert, 199 Or.App. 418, 112 P.3d 365, rev. den., 339 Or. 230, 119 P.3d 790 (2005). The same holds true with respect to the principles set out in Blakely. McClanahan v. Hill, 200 Or.App. 9, 10, 112 P.3d 456, rev. den., 339 Or. 450 (2005) ... Second, petitioner argues that his criminal trial counsel's failure to object to the departure sentence on Apprendi and Blakely grounds amounted to constitutionally inadequate assistance. To prevail on such ... ...
- Ward v. DEHAAN
- McClanahan v. Hill, S522501.