McClanahan v. Hill

Decision Date25 May 2005
Citation112 P.3d 456,200 Or. App. 9
PartiesTerry D. McCLANAHAN, Appellant, v. Jean HILL, Superintendent, Eastern Oregon Correctional Institution, Respondent.
CourtOregon Court of Appeals

Terry D. McClanahan filed the briefs pro se for petitioner.

Hardy Myers, Attorney General, Mary H. Williams, Solicitor General, and Daniel J. Casey, Assistant Attorney General, filed the briefs for respondent.

Before HASELTON, Presiding Judge, and LINDER and ORTEGA, Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Petitioner appeals from the post-conviction court's denial of his petition for post-conviction relief, making several arguments in his appellate brief. We reject those arguments without discussion. Petitioner also has filed a supplemental brief in which he asserts that the stipulated departure sentence on his conviction for first-degree manslaughter is unconstitutional under Blakely v. Washington, 542 U.S. 296, 124 S.Ct. 2531, 159 L.Ed.2d 403 (2004), and Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466, 120 S.Ct. 2348, 147 L.Ed.2d 435 (2000).

We reject petitioner's argument because the principles announced by the Court in Blakely and Apprendi do not apply retroactively in a collateral proceeding such as this one. Page v. Palmateer, 336 Or. 379, 84 P.3d 133, cert. den., ___ U.S. ___, 125 S.Ct. 205, 160 L.Ed.2d 110 (2004); Makinson v. Lampert, 199 Or.App. 418, 112 P.3d 365 (2005); see also Schriro v. Summerlin, 542 U.S. 348, 124 S.Ct. 2519, 159 L.Ed.2d 442 (2004)

(jury trial right set forth in Apprendi does not apply retroactively in collateral proceedings).

Affirmed.

To continue reading

Request your trial
3 cases
  • Peralta-Basilio v. Hill
    • United States
    • Oregon Supreme Court
    • December 28, 2005
    ... ... Page v. Palmateer, 336 Or. 379, 84 P.3d 133, cert. den., ___ U.S. ___, 125 S.Ct. 205, 160 L.Ed.2d 110 (2004); Makinson v. Lampert, 199 Or.App. 418, 112 P.3d 365, rev. den., 339 Or. 230, 119 P.3d 790 (2005). The same holds true with respect to the principles set out in Blakely. McClanahan v. Hill, 200 Or.App. 9, 10, 112 P.3d 456, rev. den., 339 Or. 450 (2005) ...         Second, petitioner argues that his criminal trial counsel's failure to object to the departure sentence on Apprendi and Blakely grounds amounted to constitutionally inadequate assistance. To prevail on such ... ...
  • Ward v. DEHAAN
    • United States
    • Oregon Court of Appeals
    • May 25, 2005
  • McClanahan v. Hill, S522501.
    • United States
    • Oregon Supreme Court
    • October 20, 2005

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT