McClarnon v. McClarnon

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals
Writing for the CourtSHANGLER
CitationMcClarnon v. McClarnon, 528 S.W.2d 795 (Mo. App. 1975)
Decision Date06 October 1975
Docket NumberNo. KCD,KCD
PartiesPaulette Sue McCLARNON, Respondent, v. Billy Ray McCLARNON, Appellant. 27544.

David A. Welte, Thomas J. McGrath, Olsen, Talpers & Welte, Kansas City, for appellant.

Ted V. McGuire, Tierney, Mushkin & McGuire, Kansas City, for respondent.

Before WASSERSTROM, P.J., and SHANGLER and DIXON, JJ.

SHANGLER, Judge.

The appellant father appeals from a judgment which denied change of custody of the infant Mitchell from the respondent mother. The original award of custody was entered upon the dissolution of the marriage in July of 1970 at which time the child was four years of age.

After this domestic rupture, the respondent entered into an admitted adultery with a male who shared living quarters with her and the boy. After a year, the respondent repented of this liaison and brought it to an end. Thereafter, she removed with the boy to Parkville where, for about a month, she shared a house with a Pat McAvoy and his two children. The appellant testified that she had slept with McAvoy, but the respondent denies an improper relationship with him. A few months later the respondent married one Jimmy Rusco, but was prompted by his abuse to divorce him.

The boy Mitchell has been beset by a tendency (seemingly an inheritance from the mother) to adiposity, so that at the time of the hearing for change of custody, he weighed 115 pounds--50 pounds over normal--although then only eight years of age. Since her divorce from the appellant, the respondent has worked steadily, so that Mitchell has spent much time with sitters.

At the trial (and on this appeal) the appellant has complained that the respondent has been neglectful of the child so that he has become slovenly of appearance, habit and manner. The appellant complains also that the mother has done nothing, as by way of diet, to abate the child's weight, although Mitchell had always responded well to such controls during his periods of visitation custody. This evidence, as well as the admitted episode of promiscuity and the inference of other impropriety, the appellant asserts, shows the unfitness of the respondent mother as the custodian of the boy.

We need only say that a review of the record of this hearing discloses that the judgment which confirmed custody in the respondent mother comports with the exercise of a wise discretion and took fully into account those statutory elements required for consideration by §...

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
4 cases
  • Musselman v. Acuff
    • United States
    • Tennessee Court of Appeals
    • November 1, 1991
    ...v. Ehr, 77 Ill.App.3d 540, 33 Ill.Dec. 11, 396 N.E.2d 87, (1979); Fletcher v. Fletcher, 170 So.2d 144 (La.App.1964); McClarnon v. McClarnon, 528 S.W.2d 795 (Mo.App.1975). More important, whether the mother marries, in virtually all cases that have considered similar circumstances the courts......
  • Marriage of Cook, In re, s. 36477
    • United States
    • Missouri Court of Appeals
    • December 16, 1975
    ...custodian, without a showing that the children are adversely affected. Klaus v. Klaus, 509 S.W.2d 479 (Mo.App.1974); McClarnon v. McClarnon, 528 S.W.2d 795 (Mo.App.1975); Yount v. Yount, 366 S.W.2d 744 (Mo.App.1963). Respondent has set forth no proof that the children were adversely affecte......
  • Marriage of B------ A------ S------, In re
    • United States
    • Missouri Court of Appeals
    • September 21, 1976
    ...such activity is its effect if any upon the child. In re Marriage of Cook, 532 S.W.2d 833, 837(9) (Mo.App.1975); McClarnon v. McClarnon, 528 S.W.2d 795, 796(2) (Mo.App.1975); Klaus v. Klaus, 509 S.W.2d 479, 481(9) (Mo.App.1974). As previously discussed, there is no evidence the children wer......
  • Fastnacht v. Fastnacht, WD
    • United States
    • Missouri Court of Appeals
    • May 4, 1981
    ...590 S.W.2d 405, 408 (Mo.App. 1979); In re Marriage of B____ A____ S____, 541 S.W.2d 762, 768 (Mo.App. 1976); McClarnon v. McClarnon, 528 S.W.2d 795, 796 (Mo.App. 1975). The issue is not condemnation or approval of a moral standard but whether the conduct in question is a detriment to the ch......