McClintic v. United States

Decision Date11 September 1922
Docket Number5858.
Citation283 F. 781
PartiesMcCLINTIC v. UNITED STATES.
CourtU.S. Court of Appeals — Eighth Circuit

Pruiett Sniggs, Patterson & Morris, of Oklahoma City, Okl., for plaintiff in error.

W. A Maurer, U.S. Atty., and J. W. Scothorn and Roy St. Lewis Asst. U.S. Attys., all of Oklahoma City, Okl.

Before LEWIS and KENYON, Circuit Judges, and JOHNSON, District Judge.

LEWIS Circuit Judge.

McClintic was convicted on a charge in an indictment of unlawfully having in his possession in November 1920, twelve gallons of corn whisky in and upon Indian country, to wit, in Osage County, Oklahoma. Concededly, the indictment was bottomed on the Act of July 23, 1892, as amended (27 Stat. 260, 29 Stat. 506, 40 Stat. 563; U.S. Comp. Stat. Secs. 4136a, 4137, and 4137aa), which declared the possession by a person of intoxicating liquors in the Indian country a criminal offense, and subjected the offender to punishment. The Act of March 2, 1917 (39 Stat. 983; U.S. Comp. Stat. Sec. 4137a), declares all of Osage County, Oklahoma, to be Indian country within the meaning of the amended Act. After sentence in accordance with the special act he brings the case here on two assigned errors, which counsel have argued: (1) That the National Prohibition Act of October 28, 1919 (41 Stat. 305), repealed the Act of July 23, 1892, as amended; and (2) that the trial court erred in admitting evidence given by the arresting officers, which was obtained without a search warrant, in violation of the Fourth and Fifth Amendments. A statement of the facts will show, we think, that the second proposition is wholly without merit. The first is a question of law.

These facts were proven and to no extent contradicted: McClintic resided on a farm in Osage County. Special officers of the Government took up secreted positions one evening on the hillside overlooking McClintic's place. About ten o'clock next morning a wagon was driven to the premises by two men. It went through McClintic's hog lot and out into his woods pasture, about three hundred yards from the house, where it was stopped. McClintic followed it. The three watchers immediately went to the wagon. When they got there McClintic was standing by it with a measuring cup in one hand and a funnel in the other, which he had carried from the house. He had just poured out of a fireless cooker about two gallons of white corn whisky into a jug. The wagon had three empty barrels in it, fourteen sacks of meal, and a sack of sugar. One of the officers said to McClintic: 'Mac, I have had lots of information about whisky at your place, and I come up to see what was going on. ' McClintic replied: 'Here it is.' The officers found a keg or small barrel covered over with rock and brush, about fifteen feet from the wagon, containing about ten gallons of white corn whisky. When McClintic had poured the whisky into the jug he set it upon the wagon. He said to the officers that there was no use taking the other boys (arresting them), for the whisky was all his.

The Act of July 23, 1892, is a special act passed for a special purpose, covering certain localities, and all of the amendments to it were made prior to the passage of the general Act of October 28, 1919; and the question presented to us is, whether the later Act,...

To continue reading

Request your trial
9 cases
  • United States v. Hess
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Eighth Circuit
    • May 21, 1934
    ...v. U. S. (C. C. A. 10) 38 F. (2d) 584; U. S. v. Lapp (C. C. A. 6) 244 F. 377; Stoneberg v. Morgan (C. C. A. 8) 246 F. 98; McClintic v. U. S. (C. C. A. 8) 283 F. 781; Murphy Oil Co. v. Burnet (C. C. A. 9) 55 F.(2d) 17; Simon v. Simon, 58 App. D. C. 158, 26 F.(2d) 530; U. S. v. Mammoth Oil Co......
  • Browning v. United States
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Eighth Circuit
    • May 9, 1925
    ...by the National Prohibition Act. This question has been heretofore answered in the negative by this court, in the case of McClintic v. U. S., 283 F. 781, and later by the Supreme Court in Kennedy v. U. S., 265 U. S. 344, 44 S. Ct. 501, 68 L. Ed. 1045. The question is at The third assignment......
  • Morrison v. United States
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Eighth Circuit
    • May 9, 1925
    ...Comp. St. Ann. Supp. 1923, § 10138 ¼ et seq.)? This question has been answered in the negative by this court in the case of McClintic v. United States, 283 F. 781, and later by the Supreme Court in the case of Kennedy v. United States, 265 U. S. 344, 44 S. Ct. 501, 68 L. Ed. 2. Was the verd......
  • Elam v. United States
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Eighth Circuit
    • August 13, 1925
    ...by the Supreme Court in the case of Kennedy v. United States, 265 U. S. 344, 44 S. Ct. 501, 68 L. Ed. 1045. See, also, McClintic v. United States (C. C. A.) 283 F. 781; Browning v. United States, 6 F.(2d) (2) Whether Congress had power to enact the portion of Act March 2, 1917 (39 Stat. 983......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT