McCoy on Behalf of McCoy v. Preferred Risk Ins. Co., No. 54796
Court | United States State Supreme Court of Mississippi |
Writing for the Court | HAWKINS; PATTERSON |
Citation | 471 So.2d 396 |
Parties | General Lee McCOY, on Behalf of David J. McCOY, a Minor v. PREFERRED RISK INSURANCE COMPANY and Singing River Hospital System. |
Decision Date | 05 June 1985 |
Docket Number | No. 54796 |
Page 396
v.
PREFERRED RISK INSURANCE COMPANY and Singing River Hospital
System.
Rehearing Denied July 10, 1985.
E. Foley Ranson, Sadler & Ranson, Ocean Springs, for appellant.
Roy C. Williams, Linda D. Baggett, Robert Wilkinson, Megehee, Brown, Williams & Mestayer, Pascagoula, for appellees.
Before ROY NOBLE LEE, P.J., and HAWKINS and SULLIVAN, JJ.
HAWKINS, Justice, for the Court:
General Lee McCoy, legal guardian of his minor son David James McCoy, appeals from a judgment of the Chancery Court of Jackson County awarding interpleaded insurance proceeds to Singing River Hospital System (Singing River), a Jackson County hospital. These funds were interpleaded by Preferred Risk Insurance Company.
Page 397
The issue we address on this appeal is the authority of McCoy and his wife as individuals to assign over unto Singing River the uninsured motorist benefits under two liability insurance policies held in the name of McCoy for injuries received by their son David.
Finding the McCoys had no such authority, we reverse as to such assignment of the uninsured motorist benefits. This decision does not affect the right of Singing River to receive all medical benefits for services rendered, as provided in the two policies.
Preferred Risk Insurance Company (Preferred) on October 31, 1981, had in effect two liability insurance policies with its named insured General Lee McCoy. McCoy's minor son, David James McCoy, was critically injured that date in an automobile accident with an uninsured motorist.
Each of these policies provided for $2,000 maximum medical pay caused by a motor vehicle accident, and $10,000 maximum insured motorist liability.
David was hospitalized in the Singing River Hospital in Jackson County, and on November 3, 1981, his parents executed an assignment of all benefits due them by Preferred, acknowledging that on November 3 there was due Singing River the sum of $47,271.02.
On November 30 McCoy was appointed legal guardian of his son by decree of the Chancery Court of Jackson County.
Preferred recognized its liability under its policies to pay $4,000 in medical benefits, plus $20,000 in uninsured motorist benefits, and following a dispute as to the lawful recipient, filed a complaint for interpleader on January 7, 1982, making McCoy, David and Singing River parties defendant.
Singing River answered, alleging propriety and necessity of the medical and hospital services rendered David, and attaching an itemized account plus a copy of the assignment.
McCoy answered February 25, 1982, affirmatively alleging inter alia he had no authority individually to assign the benefits due under the policies, that he was later appointed legal guardian, and that the insurance proceeds should be paid to him as legal guardian.
The chancellor ruled that under the insurance policies the son had no interest in the proceeds and the father, as the named insured, had a right to assign the proceeds. A decree was accordingly entered directing release of the funds by the Chancery Clerk over unto Singing River.
The McCoys have appealed.
The chancellor was correct in that portion of his ruling dealing with medical benefits under the policy. The Medical Expense Benefits under the policy...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Bauhaus Usa, Inc. v. Copeland, No. 01-60343.
...960 F.2d 19, 21 (5th Cir.1992)). 4. Id. 5. The Mississippi Supreme Court articulated this rule in McCoy v. Preferred Risk Ins. Co., 471 So.2d 396, 397-99 (Miss. 1985) and Methodist Hospitals v. Marsh, 518 So.2d 1227, 1228 (Miss. 1988). 6. There is no independent ground for federal question ......
-
Clardy v. ATS, Inc. Employee Welfare Benefit Plan, No. 1:95CV135-D-D.
...right to insurance proceeds. Methodist Hospitals of Memphis v. Marsh, 518 So.2d 1227, 1228 (Miss.1988); McCoy v. Preferred Risk Ins. Co., 471 So.2d 396, 398 (Miss.1985). Using this rationale, the plaintiffs argue that a Chancellor must likewise approve any assignment of litigation proceeds.......
-
Clardy v. ATS, Inc., Civil Action No. 1:95cv135-D-D (N.D. Miss. 3/__/1996), Civil Action No. 1:95cv135-D-D.
...right to insurance proceeds. Methodist Hosps. of Memphis v. Marsh, 518 So.2d 1227, 1228 (Miss. 1988); McCoy v. Preferred Risk Ins. Co., 471 So.2d 396, 398 (Miss. 1985). Using this rationale, the plaintiffs argue that a Chancellor must likewise approve any assignment Page 4 litigation procee......
-
In re Guardianship of Holmes, No. 2006-CA-00465-SCT.
...court approval, to execute any document granting a lien against the estate of an injured minor); and McCoy v. Preferred Risk Ins. Co., 471 So.2d 396 (1985) (parents had no authority to assign uninsured motorist benefits to ¶ 8. The United States District Court for the Northern District of M......
-
Bauhaus Usa, Inc. v. Copeland, No. 01-60343.
...960 F.2d 19, 21 (5th Cir.1992)). 4. Id. 5. The Mississippi Supreme Court articulated this rule in McCoy v. Preferred Risk Ins. Co., 471 So.2d 396, 397-99 (Miss. 1985) and Methodist Hospitals v. Marsh, 518 So.2d 1227, 1228 (Miss. 1988). 6. There is no independent ground for federal question ......
-
Clardy v. ATS, Inc. Employee Welfare Benefit Plan, No. 1:95CV135-D-D.
...right to insurance proceeds. Methodist Hospitals of Memphis v. Marsh, 518 So.2d 1227, 1228 (Miss.1988); McCoy v. Preferred Risk Ins. Co., 471 So.2d 396, 398 (Miss.1985). Using this rationale, the plaintiffs argue that a Chancellor must likewise approve any assignment of litigation proceeds.......
-
Clardy v. ATS, Inc., Civil Action No. 1:95cv135-D-D (N.D. Miss. 3/__/1996), Civil Action No. 1:95cv135-D-D.
...right to insurance proceeds. Methodist Hosps. of Memphis v. Marsh, 518 So.2d 1227, 1228 (Miss. 1988); McCoy v. Preferred Risk Ins. Co., 471 So.2d 396, 398 (Miss. 1985). Using this rationale, the plaintiffs argue that a Chancellor must likewise approve any assignment Page 4 litigation procee......
-
In re Guardianship of Holmes, No. 2006-CA-00465-SCT.
...court approval, to execute any document granting a lien against the estate of an injured minor); and McCoy v. Preferred Risk Ins. Co., 471 So.2d 396 (1985) (parents had no authority to assign uninsured motorist benefits to ¶ 8. The United States District Court for the Northern District of M......