McCulloch v. State

CourtMississippi Supreme Court
CitationMcCulloch v. State, 194 Miss. 851, 13 So. 2d 829 (Miss. 1943)
Decision Date07 June 1943
Docket Number35233.
PartiesMcCULLOCH v. STATE.

J. D Guyton, of Kosciusko, for appellant.

Greek L. Rice, Atty. Gen., and R. O. Arrington, Asst. Atty. Gen and J. P. Coleman, of Ackerman, for appellee.

ANDERSON Presiding Justice.

Appellant was indicted and convicted in the Circuit Court of Attala County of the crime of uttering a forged instrument and sentenced to the penitentiary for a term of ten years. From that judgment he prosecutes this appeal.

The evidence in this case not only showed the guilt of the appellant beyond a reasonable doubt and to the exclusion of every other reasonable hypothesis, but went further and was so overwhelming against the appellant that a verdict of not guilty would have indicated bias on the part of the jury in favor of the appellant. In such cases all errors are harmless unless they go to the extent of amounting to a denial of some constitutional right of the defendant. There is no such contention in this case. The fundamentals of a criminal prosecution were complied with. The errors complained of, if well founded, were harmless. The violation of a constitutional right can not be harmless error. Jones v State, 97 Miss. 269, 52 So. 791. But other errors, if harmless, are not...

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
5 cases
  • Smith v. State
    • United States
    • Mississippi Supreme Court
    • June 26, 2008
    ...beyond a reasonable doubt. Fulminante, 499 U.S. at 296, 111 S.Ct. 1246. ¶ 32. Although this Court did hold in McCulloch v. State, 194 Miss. 851, 855, 13 So.2d 829 (Miss.1943), that "[t]he violation of a constitutional right can not be harmless error," the United States Supreme Court later e......
  • Stokes v. State, 41694
    • United States
    • Mississippi Supreme Court
    • March 6, 1961
    ...been violated. The Court will look to the whole record in viewing this matter. Tillotson v. State, Miss., 1 So.2d 497; McCullock v. State, 194 Miss. 851, 13 So.2d 829; Parker v. State, 212 Miss. 579, 29 So.2d 910; Grace v. State, 212 Miss. 784, 55 So.2d 495; Jones v. State, 104 Miss. 871, 6......
  • Kendall v. State
    • United States
    • Mississippi Supreme Court
    • June 18, 1971
    ...have been violated. The Court will look to the whole record in viewing this matter. Tillotson v. State, 1 So.2d 497; McCulloch v. State, 194 Miss. 851, 13 So.2d 829; Parker v. State, 201 Miss. 579, 29 So.2d 910; Grace v. State, 212 Miss. 784, 55 So.2d 495; Jones v. State, 104 Miss. 871, 61 ......
  • Myers v. State, 46404
    • United States
    • Mississippi Supreme Court
    • November 29, 1971
    ...to a denial of some constitutional right of the defendant. Grace v. State, 212 Miss. 784, 55 So.2d 495 (1951); McCulloch v. State, 194 Miss. 851, 13 So.2d 829 (1943). The question of permitting an attorney to withdraw, who has once accepted a case, rests within the sound discretion of the c......
  • Get Started for Free