McDaniel v. State, 2 Div. 932
Decision Date | 14 May 1957 |
Docket Number | 2 Div. 932 |
Citation | 96 So.2d 319,39 Ala.App. 157 |
Parties | Hezekiah McDANIEL v. STATE. |
Court | Alabama Court of Appeals |
Peter A. Hall and Orzell Billingsley, Jr., Birmingham, for appellant.
John Patterson, Atty. Gen., and Geo. Young, Asst. Atty. Gen., for the State.
The appellant was convicted in the court below of assault with intent to murder.
The Attorney General has filed a motion to strike the transcript of evidence from the record on the grounds that the same was not timely filed in accordance with the requirements of Section 827(4),Title 7,Code of Alabama 1940, ActNo. 97, Special Session of the Alabama Legislature of 1956, which act was approved 9 February 1956.
In their answer to the Attorney General's motion, counsel for appellant assert:
'The record in this cause affirmatively shows that the appeal was perfected on towit, the 10th day of August 1956 and that the transcript of evidence was established in the trial court on the 8th day of September, 1956, which was within the time required by law.'
The record shows that on 15 May 1956 a verdict of guilty was returned, and on that day the court sentenced the appellant.The judgment further recites: 'The defendant having applied for and obtained an appeal to the Court of Appeals of Alabama, and the defendant having waived benefit of suspended sentence pending said appeal, and the bond of the Defendant is fixed at $300.00 by the Court.'
Thereafter, on 12 June 1956 a motion for a new trial was filed, and by the court set down for hearing on 19 June 1956, on which day the motion was denied.
On 10 August 1956 an appeal bond in the amount of $300 was filed by the appellant, which bond was on that day approved by the Clerk below.
Section 368,Title 15, Code of Alabama, provides:
'* * * (a) An entry of record that defendant appeals from the judgment with or without suspension of judgment, as he may elect, to be taken at the time of judgment rendered; or, (b) The filing of a written statement signed by the defendant or his attorney that defendant appeals from the judgment, the statement to be filed within six months * * *.'
An appeal is deemed perfected if the defendant, upon the rendition of a judgment, expresses a desire to appeal.Campbell v. State, 182 Ala. 18, 62 So. 57;Sherman v. State, 15 Ala.App. 175, 72 So. 755;Ex parte State ex rel. Coburn, 20 Ala.App. 595, 104 So. 346.
The appeal in this case must therefore be deemed to have been taken on 15 May 1956, as recited in the judgment, and not on 10 August 1956, the date of filing of the appeal bond.
By virtue of Sections 827(1)and827(4),Title 7,Code of Alabama 1940, Act No. 97, supra, a transcript of the evidence must be filed with the circuit court within sixty...
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

Start Your 7-day Trial
-
Lloyd's of London v. Fidelity Securities Corp.
...was no motion in the circuit court for a new trial. This being a civil case, the statute as to taking appeals quoted in McDaniel v. State, Ala.App., 96 So.2d 319, does not apply. The corresponding statute for civil cases is in Code 1940, T. 7, § 766, which reads in pertinent 'Any appeal tak......
-
Johnsey-Reed Bros. Coal Co. v. Sanders
...The motion to strike the transcript of the evidence must be granted. Watkins v. Kelley, 262 Ala. 524, 80 So.2d 247; McDaniel v. State, Ala.App. , 96 So.2d 319.' (Brackets added to show corresponding dates in case before Amended Rule 37 of the Revised Rules of Practice in the Supreme Court (......
-
Relf v. State, 5 Div. 671
...appeal is deemed perfected if the defendant, upon the rendition of a judgment, expresses a desire to appeal. McDaniel v. State, Ala.App., 96 So.2d 319. Act No. 886, Acts of Alabama 1951, p. 1527, listed in the Pocket Part of the Code as Tit. 7, §§ 827(1)-827(6), as amended by Act No. 97, Ac......
-
White v. City of Birmingham
...the granting of the motion to strike the transcript of evidence. Aaron v. State, 39 Ala.App. 84, 94 So.2d 415; McDaniel v. State, 39 Ala.App. 157, 96 So.2d 319; Clark v. State, 38 Ala.App. 305, 82 So.2d 805; Eidson v. State, 38 Ala.App. 321, 82 So.2d 814; Relf v. State, 267 Ala. 3, 99 So.2d......