McDevitt v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.

Decision Date29 May 2013
Docket NumberCivil Action No. 12–1297 (GK).
Citation946 F.Supp.2d 160
PartiesRobert M. McDEVITT, Plaintiff, v. WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A., Defendant.
CourtU.S. District Court — District of Columbia

OPINION TEXT STARTS HERE

Michael A. Hass, Washington, DC, for Plaintiff.

Douglas B. Riley, Treanor Pope & Hughes, Towson, MD, for Defendant.

MEMORANDUM OPINION

GLADYS KESSLER, District Judge.

Plaintiff Robert M. McDevitt (“McDevitt” or Plaintiff) brings this diversity action against Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. (Wells Fargo or Defendant) for wrongful foreclosure, breach of contract, and negligent infliction of emotional distress.

This matter is before the Court for reconsideration of Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment [Dkt. No. 19] and Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment on Liability and Partial Summary Judgment on Damages [Dkt. No. 20]. Upon consideration of the parties' Amended Joint Statement of Stipulated Facts [Dkt. No. 31] and reconsideration of the Motions, Oppositions, Replies, and the entire record herein, and for the reasons stated below, the Court grants Wells Fargo's Motion and denies Plaintiff's Motion.

I. BACKGROUNDA. Factual Background1

1. The Note and Deed of Trust

On July 18, 2003, McDevitt executed a 30–year Adjustable Rate Mortgage Note (“Note”) and Deed of Trust with World Savings Bank for a $520,000 loan to purchase a private residence at 211 C St. NE in Washington D.C. (the “Property”). The loan had an indexed interest rate that changed monthly and a monthly payment that changed annually on September 1 of each year. See Affidavit of Robert M. McDevitt, Ex. A (Note) ¶ 2 [Dkt. No. 1–2].

At Paragraph 3 of the Note, McDevitt agreed that:

I will pay Principal and interest by making payments every month.

I will make my monthly payments on the 1st day of each month beginning on September 01, 2003. I will make these payments every month until I have paid (i) all the Principal and interest, and (ii) any other charges described below that I may owe under this Note, and (iii) any charges that may be due under the Security Instrument[.]

The Note provided that McDevitt would be obligated to pay a late charge if he did not pay his monthly payment within 15 calendar days of the date it was due, and also that any failure to pay the monthly payment on the due date constituted a default, permitting the lender to accelerate the loan. Note ¶ 7(A)-(C).

McDevitt had the right to make advance payments on his mortgage, subject to certain restrictions. Paragraph 5 of the Note stated:

I HAVE THE RIGHT TO MAKE PAYMENTS OF PRINCIPAL AT ANY

TIME BEFORE THEY ARE DUE. A PAYMENT OF PRINCIPAL BEFORE IT IS DUE IS CALLED A “PREPAYMENT.” WHEN I MAKE A PREPAYMENT, I WILL TELL THE LENDER IN WRITING THAT I AM DOING SO. THE LENDER MAY REQUIRE THAT ANY PARTIAL PREPAYMENT BE MADE ON THE SAME DATE THAT A PAYMENT IS DUE.... IF I MAKE A PARTIAL PREPAYMENT, THERE WILL BE NO CHANGES IN THE DUE DATES OR AMOUNTS OF MY PAYMENTS UNLESS THE LENDER AGREES IN WRITING TO THOSE CHANGES[.]

Note ¶ 5 (emphasis in original).

2. The April 14, 2008 Payment at Wachovia Bank

World Savings Bank (the holder of McDevitt's Note) was subsequently acquired by Wachovia Corporation and, in late 2007, changed its name to Wachovia Mortgage, FSB (“Wachovia Mortgage”). Wachovia Corporation also owned Wachovia Bank, N.A. (“Wachovia Bank”). Wachovia Bank and Wachovia Mortgage were separate legal entities, but had a servicing agreement, which enabled a Wachovia Mortgage customer to submit mortgage payments; at Wachovia Bank.

On April 14, 2008, McDevitt went to a Wachovia Bank branch on Pennsylvania Avenue in Washington D.C. to make two mortgage payments: one in the amount of $4,400; the other in the amount of $25,000. On the subject line of his $4,400 check, McDevitt wrote 4/01/08 payment.” On the subject line of his $25,000 check, McDevitt wrote “Deferred interest + pay off one year principal payments.” McDevitt orally instructed employees at Wachovia Bank that he wanted the $25,000 check to be applied to future monthly payments as they would come due.2

Along with the two checks, McDevitt also submitted a payment coupon of the kind he normally used to mail his payments to Wachovia Mortgage. The payment coupon contained preprinted text reciting four payment options: (1) a “Minimum Payment” of $2,647; (2) an “Interest Only” payment of $3807.61; (3) a “Sched. Principal and Interest” payment of $4317.33; and (4) a “15–Year Pmt. Plan” payment of $6,499.93. See Affidavit of Robert M. McDevitt, Ex. C (photocopy of checks and payment coupon) [Dkt. No. 1–2].

Next to these four options, the payment coupon included lines for McDevitt to specify: (1) the amount of his payment, (2) any “Additional Amount to go to Principal/Deferred Interest,” and (3) the “Total Amount Enclosed.” On the first line, McDevitt wrote “4,400” to indicate his payment amount. On the second line, McDevitt crossed out the words “Deferred Interest,” left unchanged the word “Principal,” and added the words “one year payments,” such that (construed in the light most favorable to McDevitt) the text read “Additional Amount to go to Principal/ one year payments: $25,000” On the third line, he entered [$]29,400 for the total payment enclosed with his payment coupon.

McDevitt asked the Wachovia Bank personnel with whom he dealt for a receipt of his payment, and he received a single page photocopy of the two checks along with his payment coupon. The photocopy was date-stamped by Wachovia Bank and initialed by the branch manager.

3. Wachovia's Application of the April 14 Payment

Wachovia Mortgage subsequently applied the $4,400 check to McDevitt's regular monthly payment and the $25,000 check to reduce his principal balance. When McDevitt received his monthly mortgage statement in June 2008, he learned that his $25,000 payment had not been held for future monthly payments, as he requested, but applied to reduce his principal balance. He then contacted Wachovia Mortgage to correct the application of his payment, and was advised to “continue making payments until we've resolved this.” There is no evidence that McDevitt made a record of the date on which this conversation took place or the name of the individual with whom he spoke.

McDevitt continued to make his monthly mortgage payments throughout all of 2008, 2009, and January 2010. During this time, McDevitt made multiple telephone calls to Wachovia Mortgage and Wells Fargo 3 and was given the same advice each time: continue making his monthly payments until the application of his $25,000 payment was resolved. Again, McDevitt did not present evidence of the dates on which these conversations took place, the names of the individuals with whom he spoke, or whether such individuals worked for Wachovia Mortgage or Wells Fargo.

In or around January 2010, McDevitt spoke by telephone with a customer service representative who told him “Don't worry, its handled” and implied that [his] problem had been resolved.” This conversation left McDevitt with the impression that he was not required to make any more loan payments for approximately 12 months starting in early 2010, although Wells Fargo Bank did not send him anything in writing to confirm that his payment scheduled had been modified. As with the other telephone calls, McDevitt does not appear to have made any record of the date on which this conversation took place or the name of the individual with whom he spoke.

In February 2010, McDevitt stopped making his monthly mortgage payments.

4. The Notice of Default

On February 22, 2010, Wachovia Mortgage wrote to McDevitt to advise him that his mortgage payment due February 1, 2010 had not been received. On March 18, 2010, Wachovia Mortgage again wrote to McDevitt, expressing concern that his loan was then two months in arrears, and proposing solutions to avoid foreclosure. On April 5, 2010, Wachovia Mortgage sent McDevitt notice that “Your loan has been approved for commencement of foreclosure action which may cause you to lose your property and any owner's equity.” On June 4, 2010, Wachovia Mortgage sent McDevitt another letter advising him of his loan's delinquent status and providing information about the federal government's Home Affordable Modification Program. Wells Fargo, as successor to Wachovia Mortgage, then retained the law firm of Rosenberg & Associates (“Rosenberg”) to commence foreclosure proceedings.

5. The Foreclosure Proceedings

Rosenberg's first contact with McDevitt appears to have been through a “fair debt letter.” The parties do not agree on when the fair debt letter was mailed, but stipulated that the letter was dated July 26, 2010, and that Michael Amos (“Amos”), the individual in charge of McDevitt's foreclosure file at Rosenberg, testified that the letter was drafted and mailed on July 26, 2010. The parties further stipulated that McDevitt did not receive the fair debt letter until September 2 or 3, 2010, only a few days before the foreclosure sale, which was scheduled for September 7.4

The fair debt letter advised McDevitt of his default and the amount then due on the Note. It also stated that if, “within thirty (30) days of receipt of this letter,” McDevitt disputed all or a portion of the debt in writing, or requested the name and address of the original creditor, Rosenberg would cease collection of the debt until it obtained verification of the debt and ascertained the name and address of the original creditor.

On August 4, 2010, Rosenberg also sent McDevitt, by certified mail, a Notice of Foreclosure Sale of Real Property (“foreclosure notice”). In fact, Rosenberg sent McDevitt two such notices, one addressed to “Occupant” and the other addressed to Robert M. McDevitt.” The foreclosure notice advised McDevitt that, to satisfy his debt to Wells Fargo, his Property was to be sold at a foreclosure sale on September 7, 2010 at 10:13 a.m. See Ex. C to McDevitt's Mot. (Foreclosure Notice) [Dkt. No. 20–4]. However, McDevitt never received either of the foreclosure...

To continue reading

Request your trial
8 cases
  • Conant v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., Civil Action No. 13–572 CKK
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — District of Columbia
    • February 14, 2014
    ... ... WELLS FARGO BANK, NA entered into a contract in WASHINGTON, DC and did business in Washington, DC when they entered into the Consent Decree discussed above. WELLS FARGO ... McDevitt v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A ., 946 F.Supp.2d 160, 168 (D.D.C.2013) ; see also Dubois v. Washington Mut. Bank, No. 09cv2176, 2010 WL 3463368, at *5 ... ...
  • Conant v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — District of Columbia
    • February 14, 2014
    ... ... WELLS FARGO BANK, NA entered into a contract in WASHINGTON, DC and did business in Washington, DC when they entered into the Consent Decree discussed above. WELLS FARGO ... and it not subject to the FDCPA unless it acquire[d] [the] debt in default solely for the purpose of facilitating collection of such debt." McDevitt v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., 946 F.Supp.2d 160, 168 (D.D.C. 2013); see also Dubois v. Washington Mut. Bank, No. 09-cv-2176, 2010 WL 3463368, at *5 ... ...
  • Packard v. Mariner Fin., LLC
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Western District of Kentucky
    • May 26, 2020
    ... ... Whittiker v ... Deutsche Bank Nat'l Tr ... Co ., 605 F. Supp. 2d 914, 939 (N.D. Ohio 2009) ... suggests that a wholly unrelated third partyWells Fargo Bank, N.A.acquired ownership of the Note prior to the ... See Conant v ... Wells Fargo Bank , 24 F. Supp. 3d 1, 17 (D.D.C. 2014) ... , then this claim should also be dismissed."); McDevitt v ... Wells Fargo Bank , 946 F. Supp. 2d 160, 168 (D.D.C ... ...
  • Smith v. Mariner Fin., LLC
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Western District of Kentucky
    • May 26, 2020
    ... ... Whittiker v ... Deutsche Bank Nat'l Tr ... Co ., 605 F. Supp. 2d 914, 939 (N.D. Ohio 2009) ... See Conant v ... Wells Fargo Bank , 24 F. Supp. 3d 1, 17 (D.D.C. 2014) ... , then this claim should also be dismissed."); McDevitt v ... Wells Fargo Bank , 946 F. Supp. 2d 160, 168 (D.D.C ... ...
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT