McDonald v. City of Chicago, Ill., No. 08-1521.
| Court | United States Supreme Court |
| Citation | 177 L. Ed. 2d 894,130 S.Ct. 3020 |
| Docket Number | No. 08-1521. |
| Parties | Otis McDONALD, et al., Petitioners, v. CITY OF CHICAGO, ILLINOIS, et al. |
| Decision Date | 28 June 2010 |
130 S.Ct. 3020
561 US __
177 L. Ed. 2d 894
Otis McDONALD, et al., Petitioners,
v.
CITY OF CHICAGO, ILLINOIS, et al.
No. 08-1521.
Supreme Court of United States.
Argued March 2, 2010.
Decided June 28, 2010.
COPYRIGHT MATERIAL OMITTED.
COPYRIGHT MATERIAL OMITTED.
COPYRIGHT MATERIAL OMITTED.
COPYRIGHT MATERIAL OMITTED.
Alan Gura for the petitioners.
Paul D. Clement for the respondents Nat. Rifle Association, Inc., et al. in support of the petitioners.
James A. Feldman for the respondents City of Chicago, Ill.
Stephen P. Halbrook, Fairfax, VA, Counsel for the National Rifle Association of America, Inc., Robert Klein Engler, Dr. Gene Reisinger, Dr. Kathryn Tyler, Van F. Welton, and Brett Benson. Stephen D. Poss, Counsel of Record, Kevin P. Martin, Joshua S. Lipshutz, Goodwin Procter LLP, Boston, MA, Paul D. Clement, King & Spalding, Washington, DC, Counsel for the National Rifle Association of America, Inc.
David G. Sigale, Law Firm of David G. Sigale, P.C., Lisle, Illinois, Alan Gura, Counsel of Record, Alexandria, Virginia for the Seventh Circuit.
Charles M. Dyke, Counsel of Record, Yi-Yi Chang, Nixon Peabody LLP, San Francisco, CA, for the Board of Education of the City of Chicago, Institute of Medicine of Chicago, Wayman African Methodist Episcopal Church of Chicago, Illinois Council Against Handgun Violence, Legal Community Against Violence, Violence Policy Center, States United to Prevent Gun Violence, Freedom States Alliance, Connecticut Against Gun Violence, Maine Citizens Against Gun Violence, Citizens for a Safer Minnesota, Ohio Coalition Against Gun Violence, Wisconsin Anti-Violence Effort Educational Fund, and Gunfreekids.org in Support of Respondents City of Chicago and Village of Oak Park.
James A. Feldman, Special Assistant, Corporation Counsel, Washington, D.C., Mara S. Georges, Corporation Counsel of the City of Chicago, Benna Ruth Solomon, Counsel of Record, Deputy Corporation Counsel, Myriam Zreczny Kasper, Chief Assistant Corporation Counsel, Suzanne M. Loose, Assistant Corporation Counsel, Andrew W. Worseck, Assistant Corporation Counsel, Chicago, Illinois, Counsel for the City of Chicago; Raymond L. Heise, Village Attorney of Oak Park, Oak Park, Illinois, Counsel for the Village of Oak Park, Hans Germann, Ranjit Hakim, Alexandra Shea, Mayer Brown LLP, Chicago, Illinois, for Respondents City of Chicago and Village of Oak Park.
Justice...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Donahoe v. Arpaio, No. CV10-2756-PHX-NVW
...claims alleging deprivation of privileges and immunities are not tenable here. See, e.g., McDonald v. City of Chicago, --- U.S. ---, 130 S. Ct. 3020 (2010). Any potential claims on legal theories not specifically addressed in this order have not been adequately raised, challenged, or defend......
-
State v. Jorgenson, No. 87448–4.
...ownership varies radically between localities, as does the incidence of firearm violence. McDonald v. City of Chicago, ––– U.S. ––––, 130 S.Ct. 3020, 3128–29, 177 L.Ed.2d 894 (2010) (Breyer, J., dissenting). Furthermore, federalism and comity place the state courts in the role of the “prima......
-
Cencich v. Miller-Stout, No. 10-5164 BHS/KLS
...Second Amendment protects only the personal right to keep and bear arms for lawful purposes." McDonald v. City of Chicago, ––– U.S. ––––, 130 S.Ct. 3020, 3044, 177 L.Ed.2d 894 (2010) (plurality) (emphasis added).H. Claim 9 - Right to File Pro Se Statement of Additional Grounds In his final ......
-
People v. Mitchell, No. D059254.
...of confrontation. ( Heller, supra, 554 U.S. at pp. 592–595, 128 S.Ct. 2783; see also McDonald v. City of Chicago (2010) ––– U.S. ––––, 130 S.Ct. 3020, 177 L.Ed.2d 894 [Second Amendment applies to the states].) Based on this constitutional right, the Heller court struck down statutes that to......
-
Donahoe v. Arpaio, No. CV10-2756-PHX-NVW
...claims alleging deprivation of privileges and immunities are not tenable here. See, e.g., McDonald v. City of Chicago, --- U.S. ---, 130 S. Ct. 3020 (2010). Any potential claims on legal theories not specifically addressed in this order have not been adequately raised, challenged, or defend......
-
State v. Jorgenson, No. 87448–4.
...ownership varies radically between localities, as does the incidence of firearm violence. McDonald v. City of Chicago, ––– U.S. ––––, 130 S.Ct. 3020, 3128–29, 177 L.Ed.2d 894 (2010) (Breyer, J., dissenting). Furthermore, federalism and comity place the state courts in the role of the “prima......
-
Cencich v. Miller-Stout, No. 10-5164 BHS/KLS
...Second Amendment protects only the personal right to keep and bear arms for lawful purposes." McDonald v. City of Chicago, ––– U.S. ––––, 130 S.Ct. 3020, 3044, 177 L.Ed.2d 894 (2010) (plurality) (emphasis added).H. Claim 9 - Right to File Pro Se Statement of Additional Grounds In his final ......
-
People v. Mitchell, No. D059254.
...of confrontation. ( Heller, supra, 554 U.S. at pp. 592–595, 128 S.Ct. 2783; see also McDonald v. City of Chicago (2010) ––– U.S. ––––, 130 S.Ct. 3020, 177 L.Ed.2d 894 [Second Amendment applies to the states].) Based on this constitutional right, the Heller court struck down statutes that to......