McDonald v. City of Chicago, Ill., No. 08-1521.

CourtUnited States Supreme Court
Citation177 L. Ed. 2d 894,130 S.Ct. 3020
Docket NumberNo. 08-1521.
PartiesOtis McDONALD, et al., Petitioners, v. CITY OF CHICAGO, ILLINOIS, et al.
Decision Date28 June 2010

130 S.Ct. 3020
561 US __
177 L. Ed.
2d 894

Otis McDONALD, et al., Petitioners,
v.
CITY OF CHICAGO, ILLINOIS, et al.

No. 08-1521.

Supreme Court of United States.

Argued March 2, 2010.
Decided June 28, 2010.


130 S.Ct. 3021

COPYRIGHT MATERIAL OMITTED.

130 S.Ct. 3022

COPYRIGHT MATERIAL OMITTED.

130 S.Ct. 3023

COPYRIGHT MATERIAL OMITTED.

130 S.Ct. 3024

COPYRIGHT MATERIAL OMITTED.

130 S.Ct. 3025

Alan Gura for the petitioners.

Paul D. Clement for the respondents Nat. Rifle Association, Inc., et al. in support of the petitioners.

James A. Feldman for the respondents City of Chicago, Ill.

Stephen P. Halbrook, Fairfax, VA, Counsel for the National Rifle Association of America, Inc., Robert Klein Engler, Dr. Gene Reisinger, Dr. Kathryn Tyler, Van F. Welton, and Brett Benson. Stephen D. Poss, Counsel of Record, Kevin P. Martin, Joshua S. Lipshutz, Goodwin Procter LLP, Boston, MA, Paul D. Clement, King & Spalding, Washington, DC, Counsel for the National Rifle Association of America, Inc.

David G. Sigale, Law Firm of David G. Sigale, P.C., Lisle, Illinois, Alan Gura, Counsel of Record, Alexandria, Virginia for the Seventh Circuit.

Charles M. Dyke, Counsel of Record, Yi-Yi Chang, Nixon Peabody LLP, San Francisco, CA, for the Board of Education of the City of Chicago, Institute of Medicine of Chicago, Wayman African Methodist Episcopal Church of Chicago, Illinois Council Against Handgun Violence, Legal Community Against Violence, Violence Policy Center, States United to Prevent Gun Violence, Freedom States Alliance, Connecticut Against Gun Violence, Maine Citizens Against Gun Violence, Citizens for a Safer Minnesota, Ohio Coalition Against Gun Violence, Wisconsin Anti-Violence Effort Educational Fund, and Gunfreekids.org in Support of Respondents City of Chicago and Village of Oak Park.

James A. Feldman, Special Assistant, Corporation Counsel, Washington, D.C., Mara S. Georges, Corporation Counsel of the City of Chicago, Benna Ruth Solomon, Counsel of Record, Deputy Corporation Counsel, Myriam Zreczny Kasper, Chief Assistant Corporation Counsel, Suzanne M. Loose, Assistant Corporation Counsel, Andrew W. Worseck, Assistant Corporation Counsel, Chicago, Illinois, Counsel for the City of Chicago; Raymond L. Heise, Village Attorney of Oak Park, Oak Park, Illinois, Counsel for the Village of Oak Park, Hans Germann, Ranjit Hakim, Alexandra Shea, Mayer Brown LLP, Chicago, Illinois, for Respondents City of Chicago and Village of Oak Park.

130 S.Ct. 3026

Justice...

To continue reading

Request your trial
508 practice notes
  • Donahoe v. Arpaio, No. CV10-2756-PHX-NVW
    • United States
    • United States District Courts. 9th Circuit. United States District Courts. 9th Circuit. District of Arizona
    • April 9, 2012
    ...claims alleging deprivation of privileges and immunities are not tenable here. See, e.g., McDonald v. City of Chicago, --- U.S. ---, 130 S. Ct. 3020 (2010). Any potential claims on legal theories not specifically addressed in this order have not been adequately raised, challenged, or defend......
  • State v. Jorgenson, No. 87448–4.
    • United States
    • United States State Supreme Court of Washington
    • November 21, 2013
    ...ownership varies radically between localities, as does the incidence of firearm violence. McDonald v. City of Chicago, ––– U.S. ––––, 130 S.Ct. 3020, 3128–29, 177 L.Ed.2d 894 (2010) (Breyer, J., dissenting). Furthermore, federalism and comity place the state courts in the role of the “prima......
  • Cencich v. Miller-Stout, No. 10-5164 BHS/KLS
    • United States
    • United States District Courts. 9th Circuit. United States District Court (Western District of Washington)
    • September 6, 2012
    ...Second Amendment protects only the personal right to keep and bear arms for lawful purposes." McDonald v. City of Chicago, ––– U.S. ––––, 130 S.Ct. 3020, 3044, 177 L.Ed.2d 894 (2010) (plurality) (emphasis added).H. Claim 9 - Right to File Pro Se Statement of Additional Grounds In his final ......
  • People v. Mitchell, No. D059254.
    • United States
    • California Court of Appeals
    • August 28, 2012
    ...of confrontation. ( Heller, supra, 554 U.S. at pp. 592–595, 128 S.Ct. 2783; see also McDonald v. City of Chicago (2010) ––– U.S. ––––, 130 S.Ct. 3020, 177 L.Ed.2d 894 [Second Amendment applies to the states].) Based on this constitutional right, the Heller court struck down statutes that to......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
508 cases
  • Donahoe v. Arpaio, No. CV10-2756-PHX-NVW
    • United States
    • United States District Courts. 9th Circuit. United States District Courts. 9th Circuit. District of Arizona
    • April 9, 2012
    ...claims alleging deprivation of privileges and immunities are not tenable here. See, e.g., McDonald v. City of Chicago, --- U.S. ---, 130 S. Ct. 3020 (2010). Any potential claims on legal theories not specifically addressed in this order have not been adequately raised, challenged, or defend......
  • State v. Jorgenson, No. 87448–4.
    • United States
    • United States State Supreme Court of Washington
    • November 21, 2013
    ...ownership varies radically between localities, as does the incidence of firearm violence. McDonald v. City of Chicago, ––– U.S. ––––, 130 S.Ct. 3020, 3128–29, 177 L.Ed.2d 894 (2010) (Breyer, J., dissenting). Furthermore, federalism and comity place the state courts in the role of the “prima......
  • Cencich v. Miller-Stout, No. 10-5164 BHS/KLS
    • United States
    • United States District Courts. 9th Circuit. United States District Court (Western District of Washington)
    • September 6, 2012
    ...Second Amendment protects only the personal right to keep and bear arms for lawful purposes." McDonald v. City of Chicago, ––– U.S. ––––, 130 S.Ct. 3020, 3044, 177 L.Ed.2d 894 (2010) (plurality) (emphasis added).H. Claim 9 - Right to File Pro Se Statement of Additional Grounds In his final ......
  • People v. Mitchell, No. D059254.
    • United States
    • California Court of Appeals
    • August 28, 2012
    ...of confrontation. ( Heller, supra, 554 U.S. at pp. 592–595, 128 S.Ct. 2783; see also McDonald v. City of Chicago (2010) ––– U.S. ––––, 130 S.Ct. 3020, 177 L.Ed.2d 894 [Second Amendment applies to the states].) Based on this constitutional right, the Heller court struck down statutes that to......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT