McDonald v. Dykes, 9390.

Decision Date09 October 1947
Docket NumberNo. 9390.,9390.
Citation163 F.2d 828
PartiesCatherine McDONALD, Appellee, v. Carroll G. DYKES and Victor-Lynn Lines, Inc., Defendants and Third-Party Plaintiffs, Appellants (William J. O'Brien, Third-Party Defendant, Appellee).
CourtU.S. Court of Appeals — Third Circuit

Raymond A. White, Jr., of Philadelphia, Pa., for appellants.

Harold S. Baile, of Philadelphia, Pa. (Pepper, Bodine & Stokes, of Philadelphia, Pa., on the brief), for appellee O'Brien.

William P. Desmond, of Chester, Pa., for appellee McDonald.

Before BIGGS, ALBERT LEE STEPHENS, and MARIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

The judgment of the court below will be affirmed on the opinion of Judge McGranery, 6 F.R.D. 569.

To continue reading

Request your trial
8 cases
  • Patton v. Baltimore & OR Co.
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Third Circuit
    • 23 June 1952
    ...of the State of Pennsylvania the plaintiff could not maintain an action against it. See the decision of this court in McDonald v. Dykes, 3 Cir., 163 F.2d 828, affirming D.C., 6 F.R.D. 569. It is hornbook law that the jurisdiction of a District Court of the United States must appear affirmat......
  • Smith v. Philadelphia Transp. Co., 9720
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Third Circuit
    • 25 February 1949
    ... ... See McDonald v. Dykes, D.C.E.D.Pa.1947, 6 F.R.D. 569, affirmed 3 Cir., 1947, 163 F.2d 828; Federal Rules of ... ...
  • Mickelic v. United States Postal Service
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Eastern District of Pennsylvania
    • 11 July 1973
    ... ... Md. 1967); Armstrong v. United States, 171 F.Supp. 835, 840 f.n. 4 (E.D.Pa. 1959); McDonald v. Dykes, 6 F.R.D. 569 (E.D.Pa. 1947); aff'd per curiam 163 F.2d 828 (3d Cir. 1947); 3 Moore's ... ...
  • Sheppard v. Atlantic States Gas Co.
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Third Circuit
    • 19 April 1948
    ... ... Pennsylvania R. Co., 3 Cir., 162 F.2d 524, 528, nor McDonald v. Dykes, E.D.Pa., 6 F.R.D. 569, affirmed per curiam 3 Cir., 163 F.2d 828, are contrary to this ... ...
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT