McDonald v. Howe

CourtNorth Carolina Supreme Court
Writing for the CourtCLARK, C.J.
CitationMcDonald v. Howe, 178 N.C. 257, 100 S.E. 427 (N.C. 1919)
Decision Date15 October 1919
Docket Number286.
PartiesMCDONALD ET AL. v. HOWE ET AL.

Appeal from Superior Court, New Hanover County; Calvert, Judge.

Action by Nada R. McDonald and another against Alfred G. Howe and others. From judgment dismissing the action, plaintiffs appeal. Reversed.

Under a will devising property to a sister, to use until her two daughters became of age, when it should become theirs, and providing that, should they die leaving sisters or brothers of their mother's children, the sisters or brothers should inherit, but, should they die, the property was to be sold and the proceeds divided between the children of testatrix's brothers the two daughters acquired a fee simple absolute on their arriving at 21.

Mary Washington Howe, the aunt of the plaintiffs, provided in her will as follows:

"The remainder of my property I give to my sister, Rebecca Jane McDonald, for her use until her daughters, Nada Roberta and Alfreda Eloise, become of age, when it becomes theirs. Should Nada and Alfreda die, leaving sister or sisters brother or brothers, of their mother's children, the sister or sisters, brother or brothers, shall inherit the property here mentioned. Should they die, the property is to be sold and proceeds divided between the children of my brothers, John T. Howe and A. P. Howe."

This proceeding is to have the adverse claims of the defendants set aside and to have the plaintiff declared the owner in fee of the land described in the will. The plaintiffs, Nada Roberta and Alfreda Eloise McDonald, are both of age. The defendants are their minor sisters, who through their guardian ad litem demurred to the complaint upon the ground that it does not state a cause of action, because it appears from the will under which the plaintiffs claim the land that they--

"were only given a life estate in said property and not the fee and at most they only own a determinable fee, and that in the event they should die leaving a brother or sister of their mother's children that the fee simple estate would be given to such brother or sister; and this being true, the plaintiffs are not entitled to have the court adjudge that these defendants have no interest in said property and that the plaintiffs own the same in fee simple."

The other defendants are the sons of John T. and A. P. Howe. The case coming before Stacy, Judge, at Fall term, 1918, he sustained the demurrer and held that the plaintiffs were not the owners in fee of the land described in the complaint, but the court adjourned before the judgment sustaining the demurrer was signed.

The case was brought before Calvert, J., at April term, 1919, of the same court, who ruled that "plaintiffs are not the owners in fee of the land, but only have a life estate therein, or at most a determinable fee, and therefore are not entitled to the relief prayed for," and dismissed the action. Appeal by plaintiffs.

A. S. Williams, of Wilmington, for appellants.

CLARK C.J.

There was no irregularity upon the face of the proceedings. This court has repeatedly held that the requirement that a judgment should be signed by the judge is "only directory, and a judgment passed in open court and filed with the papers as a part of the judgment roll is a valid judgment, though not signed by the judge." Range Co. v. Carver, 118 N.C. 328, 24 S.E. 352, citing Rollins v. Henry, 78 N.C. 342; Matthews v. Joyce, 85 N.C. 258; Keener v. Goodson, 89 N.C. 273; Spencer v. Credle, 102 N.C. 68, 8 S.E. 901; Bond v. Wool, 113 N.C. 20, 18 S.E. 77.

Even if the judgment should have been signed, the record could be completed by entering judgment nunc pro tunc at a succeeding term of the court. Ferrell v. Hales, 119 N.C. 212 25 S.E. 821, and cases there cited, which has been approved in Taylor v. Ervin, 119 N.C. 274...

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
8 cases
  • Elmore v. Austin
    • United States
    • North Carolina Supreme Court
    • May 3, 1950
    ...possible moment that the testator's language will permit. Priddy & Co., v. Sanderford, 221 N.C. 422, 20 S.E.2d 341; McDonald v. Howe, 178 N.C. 257, 100 S.E. 427. As an incident of this rule, courts prefer to construe doubtful conditions as subsequent rather than precedent because such const......
  • Westfeldt v. Reynolds
    • United States
    • North Carolina Supreme Court
    • May 27, 1926
    ... ... Daughtridge, 188 N.C. 193, 124 S.E. 148; Goode v ... Hearne, 180 N.C. 475, 105 S.E. 5; McDonald v ... Howe, 178 N.C. 257, 100 S.E. 427; Bell v ... Keesler, 175 N.C. 525, 95 S.E. 881; Bank v ... Murray, 175 N.C. 62, 94 S.E. 665; Whitfield ... ...
  • Chas. W. Priddy & Co. v. Sanderford
    • United States
    • North Carolina Supreme Court
    • June 5, 1942
    ... ... that a devise should take effect at the earliest possible ... moment that the language will permit. McDonald v ... Howe, 178 N.C. 257, 100 S.E. 427. The law favors the ... early vesting of estates--it hastens the time when the ... ulterior limitation ... ...
  • Wachovia Bank & Trust Co. v. Taylor, 667
    • United States
    • North Carolina Supreme Court
    • June 16, 1961
    ...of twenty-five years.' '* * * (A) devise should take effect at the earliest moment that the language will permit.' McDonald v. Howe, 178 N.C. 257, 259, 100 S.E. 427, 428. Had the language of the will been such as to show that the testator intended that the remainder go to such of the grandc......
  • Get Started for Free