McDonald v. Royal Indem. Ins. Co.

Decision Date17 October 1932
Docket NumberNo. 92.,92.
Citation162 A. 620
PartiesMcDONALD v. ROYAL INDEMNITY INS. CO.
CourtNew Jersey Supreme Court

Syllabus by the Court.

1. The provisions of an insurance policy examined and found not to include any obligation to settle ail action at law brought against its assured.

2. The case is barren of evidence of negligent management by defendant of an action brought against its assured.

Appeal from Supreme Court.

Suit by Henry B. McDonald against the Royal Indemnity Insurance Company. From a judgment of nonsuit, the plaintiff appeals. Affirmed.

Bain & Fowler, of Boonton (Alfred Brenner, of Bayonne, of counsel), for appellant.

King & Vogt, of Morristown (Harold A. Price, of Morristown, of counsel), for appellee.

BODINE, J.

This is an appeal from a Judgment of nonsuit. The plaintiff procured from the defendant a policy of indemnity insurance. He became involved in an automobile accident, and a judgment was recovered against him. He sought in this action to recover damages against the indemnity company, alleging that it had failed and neglected to properly protect and represent him as required by the terms of its policy. It appears that the defendant company could have settled the action against the plaintiff for $2,000. A verdict for $7,500, however, was recovered. This judgment was set aside. Subsequently the action could have been settled for $3,500, but a judgment was recovered for $20,000.

The policy is in the usual form. The pertinent portions are as follows: "The Royal Indemnity Company * * * hereby agrees with the insured * * * that if during the term (of the policy) any person or persons should sustain bodily injuries by accident whether resulting fatally or otherwise * * * by reason of the ownership, maintenance or use * * * of the automobiles described * * * at any location within the United States of America or the Dominion of Canada for which bodily injuries * * * the insured * * * as hereinafter provided, are liable for damages, Then the Company shall indemnify against loss arising out of such liability, subject to the limits of liability set forth in Statement 12, * * * And will in addition, in the name and on behalf of the name insured * * * 1. Defend all claims or suits for such bodily injuries; 2. (a) Pay all costs and expenses incurred with the company's written consent. (b) Pay all taxed costs. (c) Indemnify for all interest accruing upon any judgment. 3. Repay the expense incurred in providing such immediate...

To continue reading

Request your trial
14 cases
  • White v. North Bergen Tp.
    • United States
    • New Jersey Supreme Court
    • 14 Septiembre 1978
    ...between insured and insurer, overruling the precedent unanimously endorsed by our then highest court in McDonald v. Royal Indem. Ins. Co., 109 N.J.L. 308, 162 A. 620 (E. & A. 1932). In In re Quinlan, 70 N.J. 10, 355 A.2d 647, Cert. den., 429 U.S. 922, 97 S.Ct. 319, 50 L.Ed.2d 289 (1976), we......
  • Rova Farms Resort, Inc. v. Investors Ins. Co. of America
    • United States
    • New Jersey Supreme Court
    • 7 Agosto 1974
    ...into the bare contractual relationship sometimes mentioned as existing between insured and insurer. Cf. McDonald v. Royal Indemnity Ins. Co., 109 N.J.L. 308, 162 A. 620 (E. & A. 1932); Auerbach v. Maryland Cas. Co., 236 N.Y. 247, 140 N.E. 577 There was always, in fact and in law, a conflict......
  • Pickett v. Lloyd's
    • United States
    • New Jersey Supreme Court
    • 15 Marzo 1993
    ...sometimes mentioned as existing between insured and insurer." 65 N.J. at 491, 323 A.2d 495 (citing McDonald v. Royal Indem. Ins. Co., 109 N.J.L. 308, 162 A. 620 (E. & A.1932)). Agents of an insurance company are obligated to "exercise good faith and reasonable skill in advising insureds." W......
  • McCombs v. Fidelity & Cas. Co. of New York
    • United States
    • Missouri Court of Appeals
    • 5 Noviembre 1935
    ... ... Mann, 46 S.W.2d 777 (Ky.); Streat Coal Co. v ... Frankfort Genl. Ins. Co., 142 N.E. 352 (N. Y.); ... Lander et al. v. Jordan, 59 S.W.2d 959 ... Breen, 271 N.Y.S. 744, l. c. 747 (1934); McDonald v ... Royal Ind. Ins. Co., 162 A. 620 (N.J.); City of ... Wakefield ... ...
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT