McDonald v. Wilson
Decision Date | 11 July 1911 |
Docket Number | Case Number: 901 |
Citation | 1911 OK 274,116 P. 920,29 Okla. 309 |
Parties | McDONALD et al. v. WILSON. |
Court | Oklahoma Supreme Court |
¶0 APPEAL AND ERROR--Review--Assignments of Error. Where the plaintiff in error fails to assign as error the overruling of the motion for a new trial in the petition in error, no question is properly presented in this court to review errors alleged to have occurred in the progress of the trial in the lower court.
Error from District Court, Wagoner County; J. H. King, Judge.
Action between Hugh McDonald and others and Charles Wilson. From the judgment, McDonald and others bring error. Affirmed.
W. T. Hunt, for plaintiffs in error.
Enloe V. Vernor, for defendant in error.
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Nat'l Sur. Co. v. First Bank of Texola
......Barrett, 44 Okla. 101, 143 P. 673; Turner v. First Nat. Bank, 40 Okla. 498, 139 P. 703; Nichols v. Dexter, 52 Okla. 152, 152 P. 817; McDonald v. Wilson, 29 Okla. 309, 116 P. 920; St. L., I. M. & S. Ry. Co. v. Dyer, 36 Okla. 112, 128 P. 265; Butler v. Okla. St. Bank, 36 Okla. 611, 129 P. ......
-
Turner v. First Nat. Bank
......865; Kimbriel v. Montgomery, 28 Okla. 743, 115 P. 1013; Meyer v. James, 29 Okla. 7, 115 P. 1016; Cox v. Lavine, 29 Okla. 312, 116 P. 920; McDonald v. Wilson, 29 Okla. 309, 116 P. 920; Burroughs v. Funk, 29 Okla. 677, 119 P. 976; George v. Moore, 32 Okla. 842, 124 P. 36. The ninth assignment is ......
-
Bice v. Myers
......See McDonald et al. v. Wilson, 29 Okla. 309, 116 P. 920; Cox v. Lavine, 29 Okla. 312, 116 P. 920; Kimbriel v. Montgomery, 28 Okla. 743, 115 P. 1013; Whiteacre v. ......
-
George v. Moore
......McDonald et al. v. Wilson, 29 Okla. 309, 116 P. 920; Cox v. Lavine, 29 Okla. 312, 116 P. 920; Kimbriel v. Montgomery, 28 Okla. 743, 115 P. 1013; Whiteacre v. ......