McGhee v. International Paper Co., No. 2971185.

CourtAlabama Court of Civil Appeals
Writing for the CourtTHOMPSON.
Citation729 So.2d 880
Decision Date26 February 1999
Docket NumberNo. 2971185.
PartiesAndrew McGHEE v. INTERNATIONAL PAPER COMPANY d/b/a Maplesville Mill.

729 So.2d 880

Andrew McGHEE
v.
INTERNATIONAL PAPER COMPANY d/b/a Maplesville Mill

No. 2971185.

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama.

February 26, 1999.


Tom L. Larkin of Tipler Law Offices, Birmingham, for appellant.

Roy W. Scholl III, Birmingham, for appellee.

THOMPSON, Judge.

In April 1995, Andrew McGhee, an employee of International Paper Company, suffered an injury to his left hand while feeding lumber into a feeder machine. He ultimately underwent surgery to that hand on September 14, 1995, to repair the damage caused by the accident. He sued for workers' compensation benefits that he claimed the company owed him as a result of that accident. During a bench trial, the parties made a number of stipulations, which the court incorporated into its final judgment. The sole issue that remained for the trial court to decide was the amount of temporary total disability benefits owed to McGhee.

Following a hearing during which the trial court heard oral arguments from the attorneys and considered stipulations, depositions and exhibits, but took no testimony, the trial court entered a judgment that provided in pertinent part:

"The court finds that [McGhee] was released to work as tolerated by his treating physician, on October 17, 1995, and that subsequently [McGhee] sought treatment from Dr. Victoria Masear on November 16, 1995. The Court finds that Dr. Victoria Masear removed the plaintiff from work on November 16, 1995 until May 2, 1996, when she released [McGhee] to work without restrictions. The Court also finds that [McGhee] was due to receive 24 weeks of back temporary total disability benefits for the period of November 16, 1995, through May 2, 1996...."

McGhee appealed, challenging the trial court's award of temporary total disability benefits. He contends that the trial court erred in determining that his temporary total disability benefits terminated as of the date

729 So.2d 881
on which Dr. Masear approved his return to work with no restrictions. He argues that he should have been awarded temporary total disability benefits through the date on which he reached maximum medical improvement. We agree

The evidence presented to the trial court consisted of stipulations, depositions, and exhibits. The trial court heard no oral testimony; therefore, the ore tenus principle does not apply. Whitehead v. Hester, 512 So.2d 1297, 1299 (Ala.1987). Accordingly, this court must review this issue de novo, by applying established legal principles to the evidence contained in the record on appeal. Id. Further, appellate review of pure legal issues in a workers' compensation case is without a presumption of correctness. Ala. Code 1975, § 25-5-81; Flesher v. Saginaw Div., General Motors Corp., 689 So.2d 113 (Ala.Civ.App.1996).

"Temporary total disability refers to `the healing period during which an employee is recovering and unable to work.'" Ex parte Moncrief, 627 So.2d 385, 387 (Ala.1993)(quoting Haywood v. Russell Corp., 611 So.2d 365, 367 (Ala.Civ.App.1992)). "A determination of when maximum medical improvement is reached depends on the circumstances of each case." Pemco Aeroplex, Inc. v. Johnson, 634 So.2d 1018, 1020 (Ala.Civ. App.1994).

The medical records submitted to the trial court reflect that Dr. Andrew Hilliard performed surgery on McGhee's hand on September 14, 1995, and released him to work "as tolerated" on October 17, 1995. McGhee testified in his deposition that he returned to work on October 18, 1995, and was assigned to his former job, operating the drop sorter. McGhee explained in his deposition that this job involved shifting heavy metal levers to stop the assembly line in the event of an obstruction. McGhee explained in his deposition that he performed this job for approximately four hours, until he realized that his hand was extremely swollen; that when he showed his swollen hand to his supervisors, they...

To continue reading

Request your trial
7 practice notes
  • State v. Green, CR-06-1871.
    • United States
    • Alabama Court of Criminal Appeals
    • April 4, 2008
    ...not apply." Holy Family Catholic School v. Boley, 847 So.2d 371, 374 (Ala.Civ.App.2002)(citing McGhee v. International Paper Co., 729 So.2d 880 (Ala. Civ.App.1999)). Therefore, no presumption of correctness attaches to the trial court's judgment, and this Court's review of the trial co......
  • Saad's Healthcare Services v. Meinhardt, 2060302.
    • United States
    • Alabama Court of Civil Appeals
    • September 28, 2007
    ...not apply." Holy Family Catholic School v. Boley, 847 So.2d 371, 374 (Ala.Civ.App.2002)(citing McGhee v. International Paper Co., 729 So.2d 880 (Ala. Civ.App.1999)). Therefore, no presumption of correctness attaches to the trial 19 So.3d 853 court's judgment, and our review of the tria......
  • Poulin v. Norwood, 2120041.
    • United States
    • Alabama Court of Civil Appeals
    • December 31, 2013
    ...does not apply.’ Holy Family Catholic School v. Boley, 847 So.2d 371, 374 (Ala.Civ.App.2002) (citing McGhee v. International Paper Co., 729 So.2d 880 (Ala.Civ.App.1999)). Therefore, no presumption of correctness attaches to the trial court's judgment, and our review of the trial court's jud......
  • International Paper Co. v. Melton
    • United States
    • Alabama Court of Civil Appeals
    • June 27, 2003
    ...testimony presented by either the worker or the employer that supports the trial court's judgment. See McGhee v. International Paper Co., 729 So.2d 880, 881 (Ala.Civ. 866 So.2d 1175 App.1999)("The evidence presented to the trial court consisted of stipulations, depositions, and exhibit......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
7 cases
  • State v. Green, CR-06-1871.
    • United States
    • Alabama Court of Criminal Appeals
    • April 4, 2008
    ...not apply." Holy Family Catholic School v. Boley, 847 So.2d 371, 374 (Ala.Civ.App.2002)(citing McGhee v. International Paper Co., 729 So.2d 880 (Ala. Civ.App.1999)). Therefore, no presumption of correctness attaches to the trial court's judgment, and this Court's review of the trial co......
  • Saad's Healthcare Services v. Meinhardt, 2060302.
    • United States
    • Alabama Court of Civil Appeals
    • September 28, 2007
    ...not apply." Holy Family Catholic School v. Boley, 847 So.2d 371, 374 (Ala.Civ.App.2002)(citing McGhee v. International Paper Co., 729 So.2d 880 (Ala. Civ.App.1999)). Therefore, no presumption of correctness attaches to the trial 19 So.3d 853 court's judgment, and our review of the tria......
  • Poulin v. Norwood, 2120041.
    • United States
    • Alabama Court of Civil Appeals
    • December 31, 2013
    ...does not apply.’ Holy Family Catholic School v. Boley, 847 So.2d 371, 374 (Ala.Civ.App.2002) (citing McGhee v. International Paper Co., 729 So.2d 880 (Ala.Civ.App.1999)). Therefore, no presumption of correctness attaches to the trial court's judgment, and our review of the trial court's jud......
  • International Paper Co. v. Melton
    • United States
    • Alabama Court of Civil Appeals
    • June 27, 2003
    ...testimony presented by either the worker or the employer that supports the trial court's judgment. See McGhee v. International Paper Co., 729 So.2d 880, 881 (Ala.Civ. 866 So.2d 1175 App.1999)("The evidence presented to the trial court consisted of stipulations, depositions, and exhibit......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT