McGovern v. United States

Decision Date25 March 1921
Docket Number2924.
PartiesMcGOVERN et al. v. UNITED STATES.
CourtU.S. Court of Appeals — Seventh Circuit

Charles H. Soelke, of Chicago, Ill., for the motion.

Charles F. Clyne and Meyer Linker, both of Chicago, Ill., for the United States.

Before BAKER, ALSCHULER, and EVANS, Circuit Judges.

BAKER Circuit Judge.

Plaintiff in error, McGovern, deposited Liberty Bonds with the clerk of this court in lieu of personal sureties. His executrix showing that plaintiff in error has departed this life, moves that the bonds be returned to her free from the clerk's charge of 1 per cent. on the amount thereof.

Under rule 23 of this court (150 F. cxxxix, 79 C.C.A. cxxxix) the fees of the clerk for receiving, keeping, and paying money in pursuance of any statute or order of court shall be 1 per cent. on the amount so received, kept, and paid. This rule is in conformity to section 828, Rev. St. U.S. (Comp. St. Sec 1383), and in pursuance of the Act of February 19, 1897, c 263 (Comp. St. Sec. 1376).

Section 1320, Revenue Act of 1919 (40 Statutes at Large, p. 1148 (Comp. St. Ann. Supp. 1919, Sec. 3301a)), is as follows:

'Sec. 1320. That wherever by the laws of the United States or regulations made pursuant thereto, any person is required to furnish any recognizance, stipulation, bond, guaranty, or undertaking, hereinafter called 'penal bond,' with surety or sureties, such person may, in lieu of such surety or sureties, deposit as security with the official having authority to approve such penal bond, United States Liberty Bonds or other bonds of the United States in a sum equal at their par value to the amount of such penal bond required to be furnished, together with an agreement authorizing such official to collect or sell such bonds so deposited in case of any default in the performance of any of the conditions or stipulations of such penal bond. The acceptance of such United States bonds in lieu of surety or sureties required by law shall have the same force and effect as individual or corporate sureties, or certified checks, bank drafts, post office money orders, or cash, for the penalty or amount of such penal bond.'

It is to be observed that rule 23 does not limit the fee to the handling of 'cash,' meaning thereby the coinage of the government and the issues of notes which the government by law ranks with its coins. 'Money' is a broader and more generic term and may include not only...

To continue reading

Request your trial
9 cases
  • United States v. Pennsylvania R. Co.
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Fourth Circuit
    • July 5, 1922
    ... ... raised also a question as to the right, or duty, of the clerk ... to charge the 1 per cent. clerk's commission on some ... $19,000 face value of Liberty Bonds, which had been deposited ... by Vincenti with the clerk in lieu of cash bail. The decision ... of the court below (following McGovern v. U.S ... (C.C.A.) 272 F. 262) in respect to the commission on the ... bonds was in favor of the government. It was stipulated by ... counsel for all the parties above mentioned that the decision ... of this court in the present case should be binding in the ... other cases. However, this ... ...
  • Phelps v. Citizens Union Nat. Bank
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Western District of Kentucky
    • February 13, 1936
    ...for safekeeping the government obligations deposited by the defendant in lieu of corporate or individual sureties. McGovern v. United States (C.C.A.) 272 F. 262, 263; The Lord Ormonde (D.C.) 276 F. 846, 848; United States v. Williams (D.C.) 282 F. 324, 326; Anderson v. United States (C.C.A.......
  • United States v. Payne
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Western District of Washington
    • February 15, 1929
    ...centum of the value on bonds deposited as bail, leaving the law for collecting, keeping, etc., money undisturbed. See McGovern et al. v. United States (C. C. A.) 272 F. 262; United States v. Williams, supra, and cases The phrase, "except when on behalf of the United States," was significant......
  • United States v. Williams
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Western District of Washington
    • June 3, 1922
    ... ... has been satisfied, and the defendant has demanded a return ... of the bonds. The clerk, pursuant to section 828 R.S ... (section 1383, C.S.), demanded as a condition to the return ... the payment of 1 per centum of the face value of the bonds ... The court's attention is called to McGovern et al. v ... United States (C.C.A.) 272 F. 262, in which it is held ... that, under section 1320 of the Revenue Act of 1919 (Comp ... St. Ann. Supp. 1919, Sec. 3301a), United States bonds are put ... in the same category as cash, and the clerk is entitled to 1 ... per centum of the face of ... ...
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT