McGowan v. State, 26215
| Decision Date | 04 March 1953 |
| Docket Number | No. 26215,26215 |
| Citation | McGowan v. State, 255 S.W.2d 512, 158 Tex.Crim. 319 (Tex. Crim. App. 1953) |
| Parties | McGOWAN v. STATE. |
| Court | Texas Court of Criminal Appeals |
Joe H. Jones, Dallas, for appellant.
George P. Blackburn, State's Atty., of Austin for the State.
The offense is the unlawful transportation of wine in a dry area; the punishment, a fine of $500.
In view of our disposition of the case, a recitation of the facts is not deemed necessary.
The trial court permitted the State to introduce before the jury the search warrant and the affidavit therefor, together with evidence that the accused was known to be a bootlegger. None of such evidence was admissible before the jury. The jury should have been retired when the evidence was heard by the court on the issues of the legality of the search warrant and the existence of probable cause authorizing the search of the automobile.
At the conclusion of the testimony, the appellant moved the court to withdraw the same from the jury. The motion was overruled, and the appellant excepted.
In refusing to grant the motion, the court fell into error, which calls for a reversal of this...
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
-
Lacy v. State, 40821
...question of the accused's intent in possessing liquor was error. Evans v. State, 169 Tex.Cr.R. 295, 333 S.W.2d 387; McGowan v. State, 158 Tex.Cr.R. 319, 255 S.W.2d 512; Walker v. State, 146 Tex.Cr.R. 321, 174 S.W.2d 974; Balleu v. State, supra, and Lanham v. State, 99 Tex.Cr.R. 410, 269 S.W......
-
Doggett v. State
...51 Tex.Jur.2d, Searches and Seizures, Sec. 45, p. 729. Their admission into evidence over objection was error. McGowan v. State, 158 Tex.Cr.R. 319, 255 S.W.2d 512 (1953); Arnold v. State, 157 Tex.Cr.R. 313, 248 S.W.2d 738 (1952); Byars v. State, 154 Tex.Cr.R. 515, 229 S.W.2d 169 (1950). How......
-
Tucker v. State, 32181
...125 S.W.2d 293; Byars v. State, 154 Tex.Cr.R. 515, 229 S.W.2d 169; Hebert v. State, 157 Tex.Cr.R. 504, 249 S.W.2d 925; McGowan v. State, 158 Tex.Cr.R. 319, 255 S.W.2d 512; Hicks v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 318 S.W.2d 652; and Zorn v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 321 S.W.2d The record further shows that S......
-
Zorn v. State, 30479
...125 S.W.2d 293; Byars v. State, 154 Tex.Cr.R. 515, 229 S.W.2d 169; Hebert v. State, 157 Tex.Cr.R. 504, 249 S.W.2d 925; McGowan v. State, 158 Tex.Cr.R. 319, 255 S.W.2d 512. The judgment is reversed and the cause Opinion approved by the Court. ...