McGrath v. Cities Service Co.
Decision Date | 24 October 1950 |
Citation | 93 F. Supp. 408 |
Parties | McGRATH, Atty. Gen., v. CITIES SERVICE CO. et al. |
Court | U.S. District Court — Southern District of New York |
Irving H. Saypol, United States Attorney for Southern District of New York, New York City, James A. Devlin, Assistant United States Attorney, New York City, George B. Searls, Edward J. Friedlander, Attorneys, Office of Alien Property, Department of Justice, Washington, D. C., for plaintiff.
Milbank, Tweed, Hope & Hadley, New York City, Timothy N. Pfeiffer, New York City, for Chase Nat. Bank of City of New York.
Frueauff, Burns, Ruch & Farrell, New York City, for Cities Service Co.
Each party moves either for judgment on the pleadings or for summary judgment. There appears to be no issue between the parties as to any material fact.
On January 5, 1950, after some previous correspondence, the Office of Alien Property authorized and directed defendant Cities Service Company to cancel bonds M 23293 and M 23318 and to issue to the Attorney General in lieu thereof its check representing the proceeds of redemption with accrued interest. These two bonds had been called for redemption prior to the issuance of the Vesting Order. Cities Service Company was also authorized and directed to cancel bond M 7029 and to issue to the Attorney General a new bond of the same series for the same face value and having affixed thereto the number of coupons corresponding to the unredeemed coupons affixed to M 7029, or, alternatively, to issue a check for the redemption price and accrued interest. This bond matures in 1969.
This action was brought January 30, 1950, to enforce the above demands. Defendant Chase National Bank is the present trustee under the indentures under which the bonds were issued.
The parties have stipulated that no claim is to be made with regard to M 23293 because it was paid prior to the issuance of the Vesting Order. M 7029 was presented for redemption in New York by Fiduciary Trust Company of New York on behalf of Globe & Rutgers Fire Insurance Company on January 5, 1950. It was not redeemed. A notation of the issuance of the Vesting Order was made on the debenture and it was then returned to Fiduciary Trust Company. It is now apparently in the possession of a New York brokerage firm. The parties have stipulated that
The Trading with the Enemy Act, § 5(b) (1), 50 U.S.C.A.Appendix, § 5(b)...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Cities Service Co v. Grath
...the Attorney General, in issuing the vesting order in question, had exceeded his authority to vest property 'within the United States'.6 93 F.Supp. 408. The Court felt that the obligations represented by the debentures were inseparable from the certificates themselves, which, insofar as is ......