McGuire v. Gem City Motors, Inc.

Citation296 F. Supp. 541
Decision Date13 February 1969
Docket NumberCiv. A. No. 11485.
PartiesDon H. McGUIRE, Frances E. McGuire, Michael McGuire and Randall McGuire v. GEM CITY MOTORS, INC., and Emmett Julius Davis.
CourtU.S. District Court — Northern District of Georgia

Morgan & Garner, Chattanooga, Tenn., Cook & Palmour, Summerville, Ga., for plaintiffs.

Shoob, McLain & Jessee, Atlanta, Ga., for defendants.

ORDER

HENDERSON, District Judge.

This is a diversity suit for damages for injuries suffered in an automobile accident by individual members of the Don H. McGuire family, Tennessee residents, against Gem City Motors, Inc., a now defunct Georgia automobile sales agency, and Emmett Julius Davis, one of its salesmen. Defendant, Gem City Motors, Inc., (hereinafter referred to as Gem City) seeks summary judgment as to it, contending that, because at the time of the accident defendant Davis was either driving home or on an errand of his own which had no business value to Gem City, it can not be liable for the torts of Davis, under the doctrine of respondeat superior. The court agrees, and grants the motion for summary judgment as to the defendant, Gem City Motors, Inc.

Davis was employed by Gem City on or shortly before November 23, 1966, as an automobile salesman. He worked on a commission basis, and was furnished with a demonstrator automobile, a 1966 Mercury Parklane, four door hardtop, which he could use as a demonstrator for prospective customers and for his own use. This included transportation between the company's place of business and his home. The only limitation placed on his use was that he was to have prior permission of Gem City before taking the vehicle out of town or on a long trip, but he was free to use the vehicle in Marietta and Cobb County and in the Atlanta metropolitan area without specific permission from the company. He furnished the gas.

There is no evidence that there was any control exerted by Gem City over Davis, other than as to result, to-wit, the sale of automobiles. It was Gem City policy for its salesmen to remain sober on the job, and not to entertain prospective customers socially or in any other way by the use of alcoholic beverages.

On the date of the accident, November 23, 1966, Davis worked "on the floor", selling automobiles at the business location of Gem City, from 8:30 A.M. to 1:00 P.M., and was to return from 6:00 P.M. to 9:00 P.M. When he left work at 1:00 P.M., he proceeded to the Busy Bee Cafe in Marietta, Georgia, which is on U.S. 41, a four-lane highway, where he met a friend and proceeded to eat hamburgers and to drink beer and whiskey, the whiskey being provided by the friend. Davis no longer remembers the name of the friend, but he does remember that he made no attempt at the meeting to sell or demonstrate any automobile. He does not recall how much beer was consumed but does remember having four or five drinks of whiskey. Shortly after 3:00 P.M. on that date, Davis left the Busy Bee Cafe in the Mercury to pick his wife up at work and take her home. She was not to get off from work until 4:30 P.M., but he was going to wait for her at her place of employment. While turning from the extreme right northbound lane of U.S. 41 onto Allgood Road, Davis lost control of his vehicle and collided with the vehicle driven by one of the plaintiffs, Mrs. Frances E. McGuire.

The controlling statute is Georgia Code Ann. Section 105-108 (rev.1968).

Every person shall be liable for torts committed by his wife, his child, or his servant, by his command or in the prosecution and within the scope of his business, whether the same shall be by negligence or voluntary.

Thus, the controlling question in this case is whether an employee driving home in the afternoon in a car owned by his employer, upon which there are virtually no restrictions as to its use, is within the course and scope of his employer's business.1

The entire evidence in the case, as to the issue of liability, consists of a deposition and affidavit of Davis and an affidavit of A. D. McGaughey, Jr., the president of Gem City Motors, Inc. All of this evidence is uncontradicted, as plaintiffs have not responded by affidavits or otherwise, as provided by Fed. R.Civ.P. 56(e), in order to set forth specific facts showing that there is no genuine issue for trial. And, even stated most favorably to the plaintiffs, there is no evidence in the case to show that Davis was engaged in any way within the scope of his employment at the time of the accident.

The leading Georgia case on this subject is Stenger v. Mitchell, 70 Ga.App. 563, 566, 28 S.E.2d 885, 887 (1944), in which, on similar facts, defendant automobile sales agency was granted a summary judgment:

As a general rule, a servant in going to and from his work in an automobile acts only for his own purposes and not for those of his employer, and consequently the employer is not to be held liable
...

To continue reading

Request your trial
5 cases
  • Harper v. Brown
    • United States
    • Georgia Court of Appeals
    • June 24, 1970
    ...the rule of respondeat superior does not apply where the use was purely personal to Harper. See also Code § 105-108; McGuire v. Gem City Motors, D.C., 296 F.Supp. 541; Fulton Bag & Cotton Mills, v. Eudaly, 95 Ga.App. 644, 98 S.E.2d 235; Fielder v. Davison, 139 Ga. 509, 77 S.E. 618. Since th......
  • Johnston v. United States, Civ. A. No. 11247.
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Northern District of Georgia
    • February 20, 1970
    ...is not to be held liable for an injury occasioned while the servant is en route to or from his work. See McGuire v. Gem City Motors, Inc., 296 F.Supp. 541, 543 (N.D.Ga.1969) (and cases therein cited). Thus, in the absence of distinguishing factors, the court would be forced to grant summary......
  • McIntosh v. Neal-Blun Co.
    • United States
    • Georgia Court of Appeals
    • May 21, 1971
    ...the rule of respondeat superior does not apply where the use was purely personal to Harper. See also Code §§ 105-108; McGuire v. Gem City Motors, D.C., 296 F.Supp. 541; Fulton Bag, etc., Mills v. Eudaly, 95 Ga.App. 644, 98 S.E.2d 235; Fielder v. Davison, 139 Ga. 509, 77 S.E. 618. Since the ......
  • United States v. American Oil Company
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — District of New Jersey
    • February 18, 1969
    ... ... Haring, Newark, N. J., Hughes, Hubbard & Reed, New York City, of counsel, for Atlantic Richfield Co ...         Milton, Keane ... Kipp, Newark, N. J., Wickes, Riddell, Bloomer, Jacobi & McGuire, New York City, of counsel, for Sinclair Refining Co ... ...
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT