Mcguire v. State Of Ohio
Decision Date | 31 August 2010 |
Docket Number | No. 07-3991.,07-3991. |
Citation | 619 F.3d 623 |
Parties | Dennis B. McGUIRE, Petitioner-Appellant, v. State of OHIO; Betty Mitchell, Warden, Respondents-Appellees. |
Court | U.S. Court of Appeals — Sixth Circuit |
OPINION TEXT STARTS HERE
ARGUED: Gary W. Crim, Dayton, Ohio, for Appellant. Seth P. Kestner, Office of the Ohio Attorney General, Columbus, Ohio, for Appellee. ON BRIEF: Gary W. Crim, Dayton, Ohio, Linda E. Prucha, Office of the Ohio Public Defender, Columbus, Ohio, for Appellant. Seth P. Kestner, Office of the Ohio Attorney General, Columbus, Ohio, for Appellee.
Before: SILER, ROGERS, and SUTTON, Circuit Judges.
Capital habeas petitioner Dennis B. McGuire challenges the Supreme Court of Ohio's conclusions that (1) the trial court properly excluded certain hearsay by the victim's husband, (2) appellate counsel was not ineffective in failing to challenge the omission of a catch-all mitigation factor from the jury instructions, and (3) sufficient evidence supports the jury's guilty verdict for rape. The district court properly rejected each of these arguments and denied habeas relief.
McGuire was convicted of the kidnapping, rape and aggravated murder of Joy Stewart, and he was sentenced to death. State v. McGuire, 80 Ohio St.3d 390, 686 N.E.2d 1112, 1114 (1997). On the last day she was seen alive, Joy Stewart visited Juanita Deaton, whose son had hired McGuire to clean the gutters of the Deatons' house. Id. Mrs. Deaton saw Joy Stewart talking to two men outside the house, and testified that McGuire and Joy Stewart left the home at about the same time. Id. McGuire's brother-in-law, Jerry Richardson, testified that while McGuire was at Richardson's house later that afternoon, Joy Stewart arrived and requested marijuana. Id. at 1114-15. McGuire agreed to get marijuana for her, and she left with him in his car. Id. at 1115. Hikers found Joy Stewart's body the next day. Id. The Supreme Court of Ohio described the physical evidence and related testimony:
When McGuire was later imprisoned on an unrelated offense, he discussed the killing with law enforcement officials:
Id. McGuire told a friend that he and Richardson had committed a murder and he was planning to blame Richardson for the crime. Id. at 1116. Two of McGuire's fellow inmates also testified at trial:
The coroner's office tested DNA samples collected from the swabs of Joy Stewart's body:
In June 1992, the Montgomery County Coroner's Office sent the vaginal, anal, and oral swabs collected from [Joy Stewart's] body, along with a cutting from her underpants, to Forensic Science Associates, a private laboratory, for DNA testing using the PCR technique. A forensic scientist there compared DNA extracted from the samples with blood samples taken from Dennis McGuire, Jerry Richardson, Joy Stewart, and Joy's husband, Kenny Stewart. The scientist determined that McGuire could not be eliminated as a source of the sperm. Kenny Stewart and Richardson, however, could be eliminated, unless there were two sperm sources, e.g., multiple assailants. This was because
the sperm analyzed contained a DQ Alpha type 3, 4, with a trace amount of DQ Alpha type 1.1, 2. McGuire's DNA was the DQ Alpha type 3, 4, whereas Richardson, Stewart, and the victim's DNA was the DQ Alpha type 1.1, 2. The forensic scientist testified that the trace amount of 1.1, 2 could have resulted either from [Joy Stewart's] epithelial cells taken in the swab, or from a secondary sperm source. The sperm DNA analyzed had characteristics that appear in about one in one hundred nineteen males in the white population.
Id. (footnote omitted). Over McGuire's objection, the trial court excluded from trial a statement by Kenny Stewart, Joy Stewart's husband, to law enforcement officials that he had engaged in anal intercourse with Joy Stewart three or four days before the murder. Id. at 1120. Kenny Stewart committed suicide before the trial began, 4 J.A. 1462, 1477, and the trial court held that his statement was inadmissible hearsay, 686 N.E.2d at 1120. The jury found McGuire guilty of rape, kidnapping, and aggravated murder with the rape specification. Id. at 1114.
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Lang v. Bobby
...its sentencing opinion. See, e.g., Sheppard, 657 F.3d at 347; Hoffner v. Bradshaw, 622 F.3d 487, 498 (6th Cir. 2010); McGuire v. Ohio, 619 F.3d 623, 630 (6th Cir. 2010).Sixth Ground for ReliefSufficiency of the Evidence Lang argues in his sixth ground for relief that the State failed to pro......
-
Hendrix v. Palmer, s. 16-2279/2310
...61 L.Ed.2d 560 (1979) (emphasis in original). Another layer of deference applies, moreover, in the habeas context. McGuire v. Ohio , 619 F.3d 623, 631 (6th Cir. 2010). After assessing whether any rational factfinder could have found the crime’s essential elements beyond a reasonable doubt, ......
-
Redmond v. Worthinton
...57 F.3d 472, 475 (6th Cir.1995). “Two layers of deference apply to habeas claims challenging evidentiary sufficiency.” McGuire v. Ohio, 619 F.3d 623, 631 (6th Cir.2010) (citing Brown v. Konteh, 567 F.3d 191, 204–05 (6th Cir.2009)). First, the Court “must determine whether, viewing the trial......
-
Moreland v. Bradshaw
...L.Ed.2d 389 (2000). We apply two layers of deference in reviewing habeas claims challenging evidentiary sufficiency. McGuire v. Ohio, 619 F.3d 623, 631 (6th Cir.2010) (citing Brown v. Konteh, 567 F.3d 191, 204–05 (6th Cir.2009)). “First ... we must determine whether, viewing the trial testi......
-
Trials
...of expert testimony about false confessions and interrogations because not direct evidence of defendant’s innocence); McGuire v. Ohio, 619 F.3d 623, 629-30 (6th Cir. 2010) (defendant not denied fair trial by exclusion of favorable hearsay because testimony not corroborated); Johnson v. Jaim......