McKee v. Harris-Seybold Co., Division of Harris-Intertype Corp.
| Decision Date | 08 March 1972 |
| Docket Number | HARRIS-INTERTYPE,HARRIS-SEYBOLD |
| Citation | 288 A.2d 585,118 N.J.Super. 480 |
| Parties | Edward B. McKEE and Barbara McKEE, Plaintiffs-Respondents, v.COMPANY, DIVISION OFCORP., Seybold Machine Co., Carl W. Hagman, Defendants, Miehle-Goss-Dexter, Inc., Defendant-Appellant. |
| Court | New Jersey Superior Court — Appellate Division |
Norman S. Costanza, Hackensack, for appellant, Miehle-Goss-Dexter, inc.
Joseph J. MacDonald, Ridgewood, for respondents, Edward B. McKee, and Barbara McKee (Harrison, Hartman & MacDonald, Ridgewood, attorneys).
Before Judges LEWIS, HALPERN and LORA.
The trial judge's rulings from which defendant appeals not having been shown to be prejudicial and a review of the record disclosing neither prejudice nor error as alleged by appellant in the court's comments during the trial, the judgment in favor of plaintiffs is affirmed.
Plaintiffs also urge that under the recently adopted R. 4:42--1(b) (effective January 31, 1972) interest should be allowed on the amounts of the judgment from February 5, 1969, the date of the institution of the action. We hold this rule does not apply retroactively to judgments entered prior to its effective date.
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Turner v. Bituminous Cas. Co.
...Citing McKee v. Harris-Seybold Co., Div. of Harris-Intertype Corp., 109 N.J.Super. 555, 264 A.2d 98, 103--105 (1970), Aff'd 118 N.J.Super. 480, 288 A.2d 585 (1972). (Emphasis The defendant herein contends that where there is a cash transfer, as opposed to the stock transaction described in ......
-
Ramirez v. Amsted Industries, Inc.
...of successor corporations. See McKee v. Harris-Seybold Co., 109 N.J.Super. 555, 264 A.2d 98 (Law Div.1970), aff'd 118 N.J.Super. 480, 288 A.2d 585 (App.Div.1972). On their appeal to the Appellate Division plaintiffs argued that a corporation that purchases the assets of a manufacturer and c......
-
TRACEY BY TRACEY v. Winchester Repeating Arms Co.
...McKee v. Harris-Seybold Co., Div. of Harris-Int. Corp., 109 N.J.Super. 555, 264 A.2d 98, 103-105 (Law Div.1970), aff'd, 118 N.J.Super. 480, 288 A.2d 585 (App.Div.1972)), aff'd, 762 F.2d 303 (3rd One of these elements is not present in this case: a continuity of shareholders resulting from t......
-
Cargo Partner Ag v. Albatrans Inc.
...834, 839 (S.D.N.Y.1977), and McKee v. Harris-Seybold Company, 109 N.J.Super. 555, 264 A.2d 98 (Law Div.1970), aff'd., 118 N.J.Super. 480, 288 A.2d 585 (App.Div. 1972). In Ladjevardian, Judge Lasker For this exception to come into operation "the purchasing corporation must represent merely a......