McKinney v. Ryan, No. 09–99018.
| Court | United States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (9th Circuit) |
| Writing for the Court | KOZINSKI |
| Citation | 745 F.3d 963 |
| Parties | James Erin McKINNEY, Petitioner–Appellant, v. Charles L. RYAN, Respondent–Appellee. |
| Decision Date | 12 March 2014 |
| Docket Number | No. 09–99018. |
745 F.3d 963
James Erin McKINNEY, Petitioner–Appellant,
v.
Charles L. RYAN, Respondent–Appellee.
No. 09–99018.
United States Court of Appeals,
Ninth Circuit.
March 12, 2014.
Ivan K. Mathew, Susan T. Mathew, Esquire, Mathew and Associates, Phoenix, AZ, for Petitioner–Appellant.
Jon Anderson, Esquire, Assistant Attorney General, Arizona Attorney General's Office, Phoenix, AZ, for Respondent–Appellee.
KOZINSKI, Chief Judge:
Upon the vote of a majority of nonrecused active judges, it is ordered that this case be reheard en banc pursuant to Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 35(a) and Circuit Rule 35–3. The three judge panel opinion shall not be cited as precedent by or to any court of the Ninth Circuit.
Judges Silverman, Murguia and Hurwitz did not participate in the deliberations or vote in this case.
To continue reading
Request your trial
7 practice notes
-
Hedlund v. Ryan, No. 09–99019.
...omitted); see also McKinney v. Ryan, 730 F.3d 903, 921–22 (9th Cir.2013) (Wardlaw, J., dissenting), vacated and reh'g en banc granted,745 F.3d 963 (9th Cir.2014). The last reasoned state court decision addressing Hedlund's Eddings claim is the Arizona Supreme Court's decision on direct appe......
-
McKinney v. Ryan, No. 09–99018.
...McKinney v. Ryan, 730 F.3d 903 (9th Cir.2013). We granted rehearing en banc and withdrew our three-judge panel opinion. McKinney v. Ryan, 745 F.3d 963 (9th Cir.2014). In his federal habeas petition, McKinney challenges both his conviction and sentence. We agree with the decision of the thre......
-
Estate of Saunders v. Comm'r, No. 12–70323.
...in the amount of the Claim's settlement value.8CONCLUSION The Claim at issue in this case was disputed at the date of the decedent's [745 F.3d 963]death, and its estimated value as of that date was not ascertainable with reasonable certainty. Under these circumstances, the tax court properl......
-
Johnson v. Shinn, No. CV-18-02864-PHX-SHR (EJM)
...its discretion when it failed to review the complete psychological report for a mitigated sentence, in violation of McKinney v. Ryan, 745 F.3d 963 (9th Cir. 2014). Id. at 4. Petitioner also alleged that his trial counsel was ineffective and convinced Petitioner to sign a plea agreement that......
Request a trial to view additional results
7 cases
-
Hedlund v. Ryan, No. 09–99019.
...omitted); see also McKinney v. Ryan, 730 F.3d 903, 921–22 (9th Cir.2013) (Wardlaw, J., dissenting), vacated and reh'g en banc granted,745 F.3d 963 (9th Cir.2014). The last reasoned state court decision addressing Hedlund's Eddings claim is the Arizona Supreme Court's decision on direct appe......
-
McKinney v. Ryan, No. 09–99018.
...McKinney v. Ryan, 730 F.3d 903 (9th Cir.2013). We granted rehearing en banc and withdrew our three-judge panel opinion. McKinney v. Ryan, 745 F.3d 963 (9th Cir.2014). In his federal habeas petition, McKinney challenges both his conviction and sentence. We agree with the decision of the thre......
-
Estate of Saunders v. Comm'r, No. 12–70323.
...in the amount of the Claim's settlement value.8CONCLUSION The Claim at issue in this case was disputed at the date of the decedent's [745 F.3d 963]death, and its estimated value as of that date was not ascertainable with reasonable certainty. Under these circumstances, the tax court properl......
-
Johnson v. Shinn, No. CV-18-02864-PHX-SHR (EJM)
...its discretion when it failed to review the complete psychological report for a mitigated sentence, in violation of McKinney v. Ryan, 745 F.3d 963 (9th Cir. 2014). Id. at 4. Petitioner also alleged that his trial counsel was ineffective and convinced Petitioner to sign a plea agreement that......
Request a trial to view additional results