McKinnon v. State, 11949
| Decision Date | 03 November 1980 |
| Docket Number | No. 11949,11949 |
| Citation | 618 P.2d 1222,96 Nev. 821 |
| Parties | Richard Sumner McKINNON, Appellant, v. The STATE of Nevada, Respondent. |
| Court | Nevada Supreme Court |
McKinnon was charged with having committed the crime of attempted murder. He was convicted of the crime of resisting a public officer while using a dangerous weapon. The issue on appeal is whether the crime of resisting a public officer is a lesser included offense of the crime of attempted murder.
Statute declares that a defendant may be found guilty of an offense necessarily included within the offense charged. NRS 175.501. On the other hand, if the offense for which the defendant is found guilty is not necessarily included within the offense charged, the conviction is void and must be set aside. State v. Carter, 79 Nev. 146, 379 P.2d 945 (1963).
The crime of attempted murder is an attempt to unlawfully kill a human being with malice aforethought, either express or implied. NRS 208.070; NRS 200.010. The crime of resisting a public officer is complete when one willfully resists, delays or obstructs a public officer in discharging or attempting to discharge any legal duty of this office. NRS 199.280.
If the offense charged cannot be committed without necessarily committing another offense, the latter is a necessarily included offense. Lovell v. State, 92 Nev. 128, 546 P.2d 1301 (1976); Holland v. State, 82 Nev. 191, 414 P.2d 590 (1966); Lisby v. State, 82 Nev. 183, 414 P.2d 592 (1966). One need only read the mentioned statutes to know that a murder may be attempted without committing the offense of resisting a public officer. Consequently, we annul the conviction of McKinnon for the crime of resisting a public officer since it is not an offense necessarily included within the charge of attempted murder.
Reversed.
1 The Governor designated the Honorable Llewellyn A. Young, Judge of the Sixth Judicial District Court, to sit in the place of The Honorable Gordon Thompson, Justice.
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Barton v. State
...17. See, e.g., Kimball v. State, 100 Nev. 190, 678 P.2d 675 (1984); Dicus, 97 Nev. 273, 625 P.2d 1175. 18. See, e.g., McKinnon v. State, 96 Nev. 821, 618 P.2d 1222 (1980); State v. Carter, 79 Nev. 146, 379 P.2d 945 (1963). 19. See Hewitt v. State, 113 Nev. 387, 936 P.2d 330 (1997). 20. 82 N......
-
Peck v. State
...found guilty is not necessarily included within the offense charged, the conviction is void and must be set aside." McKinnon v. State, 96 Nev. 821-22, 618 P.2d 1222 (1980). See also State v. Carter, 79 Nev. 146, 379 P.2d 945 (1963) where this court held a jury verdict was a nullity and void......
-
Turner v. County of Washoe, CV-S-90-706-PMP (LRL).
...delays or obstructs a public officer in discharging or attempting to discharge any legal duty of his office." McKinnon v. State of Nevada, 96 Nev. 821, 618 P.2d 1222, 1222 (1980). See § 199.280, Nev.Rev.Stat. Thus, the offense was complete when Plaintiff disobeyed Deputy Pepper's order. See......
-
Amen v. State
...the latter does not. Additionally, the former requires notification of winning a prize and the latter does not. See McKinnon v. State, 96 Nev. 821, 618 P.2d 1222 (1980). False pretense is a "representation of some fact or circumstance which is not true and is calculated to mislead ... [and]......