Mcknight v. Way
| Court | Alabama Court of Civil Appeals |
| Writing for the Court | BRYAN, Judge. |
| Citation | Mcknight v. Way, 58 So.3d 810 (Ala. Civ. App. 2010) |
| Decision Date | 06 August 2010 |
| Docket Number | 2090508. |
| Parties | Helen McKNIGHT, as conservator of the estates of William Walker Way and Alexander Spiller Way and as executor of the estate of Linda McKnightv.Jack WAY et al. |
OPINION TEXT STARTS HERE
Alabama Supreme Court 1091585. J. Paul Whitehurst, Northport, for appellant.John T. Fisher, Jr., and Jaime Webb Conger of The Fisher Law Firm, P.C., Tuscaloosa, for appellee Tuscaloosa Memorial Chapel, Inc.; and Randolph M. Fowler of Phelps, Jenkins, Gibson & Fowler, LLP, Tuscaloosa, for appellee The Peoples Bank & Trust Co.BRYAN, Judge.
Linda McKnight (“Linda”), a resident of Pickens County, died testate on May 11, 2006. Item Two of Linda's will left all of her property to her three children, Drew Smithart (“Drew”), William Walker Way (“William”), and Alexander Spiller Way (“Alex”):
“ITEM TWO
(Capitalization in original.)
Item Five of Linda's will prohibited her former husbands, Bill Smithart and Jack Way (“Jack”), from having possession or control of any property belonging to Drew, William, or Alex that they had acquired through Linda, her sister, or her parents:
“ITEM FIVE
(Emphasis added.)
The Probate Court of Pickens County admitted Linda's will to probate and issued letters testamentary to Helen McKnight (“Helen”), Linda's mother. The probate court also appointed Helen conservator of the estates of William and Alex.
William, who was Jack's son, died on September 24, 2006, at the age of 15. The Probate Court of Tuscaloosa County opened a decedent's estate for William and issued letters of administration to Tuscaloosa Memorial Chapel, Inc. (“the Chapel”), William's largest creditor. Although the record before us is not complete, Jack apparently asserted that Helen, as William's conservator, was obligated to transfer the property in William's conservatorship estate to Jack on the ground that it had vested in Jack by virtue of the statute governing intestate succession. Although her petition is not in the record before us, Helen apparently petitioned the Probate Court of Pickens County to determine that the property in William's conservatorship estate should be transferred to Linda's estate so that it could be divided between Drew and Alex. Following a hearing, the Probate Court of Pickens County entered a judgment determining that Jack was entitled to the property in William's conservatorship estate by virtue of the law of intestate succession. That judgment stated:
“IT IS THEREFORE THE ORDER OF THE COURT that:
(Capitalization in original.) Helen, in her capacities as William's and Alex's conservator and as Linda's executor, then appealed from that judgment to the Pickens Circuit Court (“the circuit court”).
The Chapel appeared in Helen's appeal in the circuit court and moved the circuit court to compel Helen to file a final settlement of William's conservatorship estate and, upon approval of that final settlement, to order Helen to transfer William's property to the decedent's estate established for William by the Probate Court of Tuscaloosa County. The Peoples Bank & Trust Company (“the Bank”), a judgment creditor of Jack's, filed a motion seeking leave to intervene in Helen's appeal and requesting that the circuit court compel Helen to file a bond as required by an earlier order of the Probate Court of Pickens County. The record before us does not indicate whether the circuit court ruled on that motion.
Following a hearing, the circuit...
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
-
Smith v. Smith
...Kershaw v. Kershaw, 848 So.2d [942] at 951 [ (Ala.2002) ].’ “Scholl v. Stacy, 981 So.2d 1116, 1120 (Ala.2007).”McKnight v. Way, 58 So.3d 810, 815 (Ala.Civ.App.2010).III. Issues In their brief on appeal, Steven and Cyndi argue that the trial court disregarded the plain language of the will b......
-
Caplan v. Benator
...Kershaw v. Kershaw, 848 So.2d [942] at 951 [ (Ala. 2002) ]. ’" Scholl v. Stacy, 981 So.2d 1116, 1120 (Ala. 2007)." McKnight v. Way, 58 So.3d 810, 815 (Ala. Civ. App. 2010). As to the terms of Simon's will, we first note that, contrary to Caplan's contention, no language in the will gives Ca......