Your World of Legal Intelligence
 United States | 1-929-605-4013

McLaughlin v. BNSF Ry. Co.

Document Cited authorities 78 Cited in 14 Precedent Map Related
Decision Date07 June 2012
Citation300 P.3d 925
Docket Number11CA0751
PartiesThomas F. McLAUGHLIN, Plaintiff–Appellee, v. BNSF RAILWAY COMPANY, a Delaware corporation, Defendant–Appellant.
CourtColorado Court of Appeals
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
13 cases
  • Scholle v. Ehrichs
    • United States
    • Colorado Court of Appeals
    • July 28, 2022
    ...might have returned a different verdict had the court not given the improper instruction." McLaughlin v. BNSF Ry. Co. , 2012 COA 92, ¶ 32, 300 P.3d 925 (citations omitted). ¶ 68 Here, the court's error in making "physical impairment and disfigurement" damages a separate category of damages,......
  • People v. Miranda
    • United States
    • Colorado Court of Appeals
    • August 14, 2014
    ...what constitutes general impeachment is vested in the trial court's discretion. See McLaughlin v. BNSF Ry. Co., 2012 COA 92, ¶ 14, 300 P.3d 925 (no abuse of discretion in admitting transcript of witness's interview where "counsel challenged [the witness's] testimony" and "more generally cha......
  • Dep't of Human Servs. v. State Pers. Bd.
    • United States
    • Colorado Court of Appeals
    • March 10, 2016
    ...276 P.3d 562 ; Van Waters & Rogers, Inc. v. Keelan, 840 P.2d 1070, 1074–80 (Colo.1992) ; McLaughlin v. BNSF Ry. Co., 2012 COA 92, ¶ 54, 300 P.3d 925 (citing Green v. Denver & Rio Grande W. R.R. Co., 59 F.3d 1029, 1032 (10th Cir. 1995) ); Tech. Comput. Servs., Inc. v. Buckley, 844 P.2d 1249,......
  • Gold Hill Dev. Co., L.P. v. TSG Ski & Golf, LLC
    • United States
    • Colorado Court of Appeals
    • December 17, 2015
    ...or harm the party seeking a new trial, or where the trial resulted in substantial justice.” McLaughlin v. BNSF Ry. Co., 2012 COA 92, ¶ 17, 300 P.3d 925 (citation omitted). “The moving party has the burden of establishing the grounds for relief under C.R.C.P. 60(b) by clear, strong, and sati......
    • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT