McLaughlin v. State
| Court | Texas Court of Criminal Appeals |
| Writing for the Court | BELCHER |
| Citation | McLaughlin v. State, 426 S.W.2d 244 (Tex. Crim. App. 1968) |
| Decision Date | 20 March 1968 |
| Docket Number | No. 41117,41117 |
| Parties | Victor McLAUGHLIN, Appellant, v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee. |
Fred D. Moore, Dallas, for appellant.
Henry Wade, Dist. Atty., Joe K. Hendley, Myron Garner and Kerry P. Fitz-Gerald, Asst. Dist. Attys., Dallas, and Leon B. Douglas, State's Atty., Austin, for the State.
The conviction is for robbery with firearms; the punishment, fifty years.
The appellant challenges the sufficiency of the evidence to support the conviction.
The testimony of the state reveals that about 2:05 a.m., January 4, 1967, Thelma Brown, night manager of a 40 lane bowling alley, sold two cigars to a colored man who appeared 'like he was looking in the cash register.' This man was wearing a red, maroon-colored shirt, gray hat, gray coat and gloves. About 2:15 a.m., Thelma again saw this man holding a pistol in the back of the porter, Harold Gooch, as they approached her at the cash register. The robber made Gooch lie on the floor and demanded of Thelma to get the 'big money' which was kept in a drawer beneath the cash register or he would shoot her and when she opened the drawer he took the big brown envelope and placed it under his coat. The robber took the money out of the cash register and placed it in a stocking cap. The man pulled the telephone from the wall and then forced Thelma and Gooch into a back storeroom where he told them to stay ten minutes or he would start shooting.
Thelma and Gooch left the storeroom after about five minutes and notified the police. About 3 a.m., January 4, 1967, Thelma identified the appellant in a four-man lineup as having previously worked at the bowling alley and she further testified that it had been a week since he had worked there. Thelma stated that while working there the appellant had gone near the cash register, and that the 'big money' was kept in a drawer under the cash register. Thelma also identified a man in the lineup as the man who held the pistol on her during the robbery. The robber took about $600 in money from Thelma without her consent as she was in fear of her life and bodily injury. While testifying, Thelma identified State's Exhibits Nos. 1 through 4 and No. 6 which included the pistol, the hat, gloves, and sweater worn by the man with the pistol; and she identified State's Exhibit No. 5 as the brown envelope kept under the cash register which the robber took from her.
Officer Smith testified that while with Officer Bryant about 2:25 a.m., January 4, 1967, they observed an automobile travelling at an excessive rate of speed which they pursued and after seeing it 'run a blinking light,' they turned on the red light and pursued it until it stopped. Officer Smith asked the appellant, who was driving the car, for his driver's license, and after telling him that he had been stopped 'for going too fast,' the appellant replied that, 'I don't have a driver's license, but it's all right, it's not my car.' Smith had to walk around the appellant twice in going to the car where he saw a colored man lying down in the back seat, and when Smith asked, the appellant told him the car belonged to the other occupant of the car. Officer Smith testified that as he walked around the car,...
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
-
Hill v. State
...sustain the jury's verdict. Gerzin v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 447 S.W.2d 925; Jones v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 436 S.W.2d 151; McLaughlin v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 426 S.W.2d 244. Appellant's first and second grounds of error are Next appellant urges that the court erred when it failed to charge the j......
-
Ansley v. State
...as those taken in the burglary. Since no timely objections to the search or fruits thereof were made, no error is shown. McLaughlin v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 426 S.W.2d 244; Anderson v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 406 S.W.2d 433; Gonzales v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 379 S.W.2d 352; Cert. den. 380 U.S. 981,......
-
Cavett v. State, 47769
...Smith v. State, 167 Tex.Cr.R. 217, 320 S.W.2d 12 (1959); Roberts v. State, 360 S.W.2d 883 (Tex.Cr.App.1961); McLaughlin v. State, 426 S.W.2d 244 (Tex.Cr.App.1968); and Jones v. State, 436 S.W.2d 151 We have considered all grounds of error and all are overruled. The judgment of the trial cou......
-
Hughes v. State
...to sustain the jury's verdict. Hill v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 466 S.W.2d 791; Gerzin v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 447 S.W.2d 925; McLaughlin v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 426 S.W.2d 244. Appellant's second contention that a variance exists between the allegation of the indictment alleging that Scott was ro......